Kadir KARAGÖZ, Murat KARAGÖZ

2513

Yolsuzluk, ekonomik büyüme ve kamu harcamaları: Türkiye için ampirik bir analiz

Yolsuzluk konusu, ekonomik büyüme ve kamu harcamaları üzerindeki etkilerinden dolayı özellikle son otuz yıldan beri iktisatçılar ve diğer kurumlar tarafından oldukça ilgi görmektedir. Yolsuzluk-ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi konusunda başlıca iki yaklaşım mevcuttur. Birinci yaklaşıma göre, yolsuzluklar ekonomik büyüme üzerinde olumlu etkide bulunmaktadır. İkinci yaklaşım ise yolsuzlukların ekonomik büyümeyi sekteye uğratacağını ileri sürmektedir. Diğer taraftan birçok çalışmada yolsuzluğun ekonomik büyümeyi kamu ve yabancı yatırım harcamaları yoluyla etkilediği ortaya konulmuştur. Bu nedenle yolsuzluk, ekonomik büyüme ve kamu harcamaları arasında çok-yönlü bir ilişki bulunması akla uygundur. Bu bağlamda anahtar kavram ise kurumsal kalitedir. Bu çalışmada, yukarıda bahsedilen etkileşim göz önünde bulundurularak Türkiye örneğinde yolsuzluk, ekonomik büyüme ve kamu harcamaları arasındaki ilişki ekonometrik yöntemler kullanılarak araştırılmaktadır. Analiz sonuçları ekonomik büyüme ile yolsuzluk arasında, büyümeden yolsuzluğa doğru bir nedensellik olduğunu, kamu harcamaları ile yolsuzluk arasında ise bir nedenselliğin bulunmadığını ortaya koymaktadır.

Corruption, economic growth and public expenditure: an empiric analysis for Turkey

Corruption has received significant attention among economists and other institutions during the last few decades, given its implications for economic growth and public spending. There are two main approaches about corruption-economic growth nexus. According to first approach corruption has positive effects on economic growth whereas the second approach maintains that corruption hinders economic growth. On the other hand, a number of studies have shown that corruption affects economic growth through both public and foreign investment spending. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that there may be a multidirectional interaction between corruption, economic growth and public spending. The key notion in this context is the quality of institutions. Considering above mentioned interrelation, this paper aims to investigate the corruption, economic growth and public spending nexus in Turkish case by employing econometric tools. The results of the analysis show that there exist a unidirectional causal relation between economic growth and corruption, which runs from economic growth to corruption, and no relationship between public spending and corruption.
PDF

___

  • Acemoglu, D. ve T. Verdier (1998), “Property Rights, Corruption and the Allocation of Talent: A General Equilibrium Approach”, Economic Journal, Vol. 108, No. 450, 1381-1403.
  • Akai, N., Y. Horiuchi, ve M. Sakata (2005), “Short-run and Long-run Effects of Corruption on Economic Growth: Evidence from State-level Cross-section Data for the United States”, CIRJE Discussion Paper Series.
  • Akai, N., Y. Horiuchi, ve M. Sakata (2006), “Corruption and economic Growth: A Methodological Note”, paper presented at the Bi-Annual Meeting of the Japanese Economic Association, Kyoto Sangyo University.
  • Anoruo, E. ve H. Braha (2005), “Corruption and Economic Growth: The African Experience”, Journal of Sustainable Economic Development in Africa, Vol. 7, No. 1, 43-55.
  • Baldemir, E., Ö. İşçi, ve H. Görgülü (2005), “MIMIC Model ve Yolsuzluk Üzerine Türkiye Uygulaması”, 5. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
  • Barro, R. (1991), “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, No. 2, 1320-1346.
  • Bayar, G. (2007), “Türkiye’de Yolsuzluğun Nedenleri: Ekonometrik Bir İnceleme”, TürkiyeEkonomi Kurumu, Tartışma Metni No. 2007/3, Ankara.
  • Cashin, P. (1995), “Government Spending, Taxes, and Economic Growth”, IMP Staff Papers, Vol. 42, No. 2, 237-269.
  • Devejaran, S., V. Swaroop ve H. Zo (1996), “The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth”, Journal of Monetary Economic, Vol. 37, 313-344.
  • Dowrick, S. (1996), “Estimating the Impact of Government Consumption on Growth: Growth Accounting and Endogenous Growth Models”, Empirical Economics, Vol. 21, 163-186.
  • Drury, A.C., J. Krieckhaus, ve M. Lusztig (2006), “Corruption, Democracy and Economic Growth”, International Political Science Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, 121-136.
  • Engen, E.M. ve J. Skinner (1992), “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth”, Research Working Paper No. 4223, NBER.
  • Everhart, S.S., J. Martinez-Vazquez, ve R.M. McNab (2007), “Corruption, Governance, Investment and Growth in Emerging Markets”, Applied Economics, 1-16.
  • Granger, C.W.J. ve P. Newbold (1974), “Spurious Regression in Econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 2, 199-211.
  • Grossman, P.J. (1988), “Government and Economic Growth: a Non-linear Relationship”, Public Choice, Vol. 56, 193-200.
  • Huntington, S.P. (1968), Political Order and Changing Societies, New Haven, Yale University Press.
  • Kelly, T. (1997), “Public Expenditures and Growth”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 34, No. 1, 60-84.
  • Khan, M.H. (2006), “Determinants of Corruption in Developing Countries: The Limits of Conventional Economic Analysis”, in International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, ed. by S. Rose-Ackerman, Edward Elgar Publishing, New York.
  • Kneller, R., M. Bleaney, ve N. Gemmell (1999), “Growth, Public Policy, and Government Budget Constraint: Evidence from OECD Countries”, Journal of Public Economies, Vol. 74, No. 2, 151-170.
  • Kormendi, R. ve P. Meguire (1985), “Macroeconomic Determinants of Growth: Cross-country Evidence”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 16, No. 2, 141-163.
  • Lambsdorff, J.G. (2006), The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform: Theory, Evidence and Policy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Landau, D. (1983), “Government Expenditure and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 49, No. 4, 783-792.
  • La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer ve R. Vishny (1999), “The quality of Government”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 15, No.1, 222-279.
  • LaPalombara, J. (1994), “Structural and Institutional Aspects of Corruption”, Social Research, Vol.61, No.2, 325-350.
  • Leff, N.H. (1964), “Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption”, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 8, No. 3, 8-14.
  • Leys, C. (1965), “What is the Problem About Corruption?”, Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, 215-230.
  • Mauro, P. (1995), “Corruption and Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, 681-712.
  • Mauro, P. (1998), “Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 69, 263-279.
  • Mo, P.H. (2001), “Corruption and Economic Growth”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 29, No. 1, 66-79.
  • Monte, A. Del ve E. Papagni (2001), “Public Expenditure, Corruption and Economic Growth: The Case of Italy”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1-16.
  • Murphy, K.M. et al. (1993), “Why is Rent-Seeking So Costly to Growth?”, American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, 409-414.
  • Nye, J. S. (1967) “Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 61, No. 2, 417-427.
  • Pellegrini, L. ve R. Gerlagh (2007), “Causes of Corruption: A Survey of Cross- country Analyses and Extended Results”, Economics of Governance, Vol. 9, No. 3, 245-263.
  • Ram, R. (1986), “Government size and Economic Growth: A New Framework and Some Empirical Evidence”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 1, 191-203.
  • Salisu, M. (2000), “Corruption in Nigeria”, Lancaster University, Management School, Working Paper, 2000/006, Lancaster, UK.
  • Sarkar, H. ve M.A. Hassan (2001), “Impact of Corruption on the Efficiency of Investment: Evidence from a Cross-country Analysis”, Asia-Pacific Development Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, 111-116.
  • Tanzi, V. (1998), “Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures”, IMF Working Paper No. WP/98/63.
  • Toatu, T. (2004), “Corruption, Public Investment and Economic Growth: evidence from Pacific Island Countries”, PIAS-DG Governance Program Working Paper, University of South Pacific.
  • Tosun, M.U. (2003), “Yolsuzluğun Nedenleri Üzerine Ampirik Bir Çalışma”, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, Cilt. 5, 125-146.
  • United Nations (1990), Corruption in Government, New York, United Nations.
Sayıştay Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1981
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1990
  • Yayıncı: T.C. Sayıştay Başkanlığı
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Mali hüküm içeren yönetmelikler ve Sayıştay istişari mütalaası

Erdal KULUÇLU, Engin HEPAKSAZ

Avrupa Birliği rekabet politikasında devlet yardımları ve Türkiye’nin uyumu

Buket İLHAN

Yolsuzluk, ekonomik büyüme ve kamu harcamaları: Türkiye için ampirik bir analiz

Kadir KARAGÖZ, Murat KARAGÖZ