___

• Bundesrechnungshof (2007), Peer Review Concerning the Macedonian State Audit Office, 3 August, Bonn.
• CAG (2008), Annual Report 2007-2008, Controller and Auditor General of New Zeland, www.oag.govt.nz/annual-report/2007-08/appendix3.htm
• CAG (2001), Peer Review of the New Zeland Audit Office, Report of the Australasian Council of Auditors, August.
• Ferguson, Andrew and Bill Rafuse (2004), Who Audits the Auditor? The International Peer Review of the Office of the Auditor General of Canada, International Journal of Auditing, October.
• Fraser, Sheila (2004), Opening Statement to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, 11 March, bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/osh_20040311_e_23408.html
• GAO (2007), Government Auditing Standards, July 2007 Revision, Comptrller General of the United States, Washington.
• GAO (2008), Independent Peer Review Teams Give GAO a “Clean Opinion,” Cite Best Practices, Press Release, 30 June. http://www.gao.gov/press/peerreview_cleanopinion.pdf
• GAO Peer Review Team (2005), International Peer Review of the Performance Audit Practice of the United States Government Accountability Office (Peer Review Report), April.
• GAO Peer Review Team (2008), International Peer Review of the Performance Audit Practice of the United States Government Accountability Office (Peer Review Report), May.
• Global Working Group (2008), New Age of Knowledge Sharing, http://www.agnet2.org/gwg/default.asp, Erişim: 11.08.2008
• INTOSAI (1992), INTOSAI Auditing Standards, Washington.
• INTOSAI (2005), INTOSAI Strategic Plan (2005-2010), http://www.intosai.org/blueline/upload/13estratplan.pdf
• INTOSAI CBC (2008a), Development of INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee, INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee Subcommittee 2 Meeting, Lima (Peru), 19-20 June.
• INTOSAI CBC (2008b), Promote Best Practices and Quality Assurance Through Voluntary Peer Reviews http://www.intosai.org/, Erişim Tarihi: 22.09.2008
• OAG (2008), Good Marks for Performance Auditing at the Office of the Auditor General, http://www.riksrevisjonen.no/en/WhatsNew /NewsArchive/News_Good_marks_for_performance_auditing+at_t he_Office_of_the_Auditor_General.htm. Erişim Tarihi: 12.09.2008
• International Peer Review of the Value for Money Audit Practice of the Office of the Auditor General of Canada, http://www.oag- bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/acc_rpt_e_10221.html#hd3a
• KPMG (2005), Peer Review Report, 29 April. http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/kpmgpeerreviewrpt2004.pdf
• KPMG (2008), Peer Review Report, 05 May. http://www.gao.gov/about/review.html.
• NAOD (2008), Peer Review of the National Audit Office of Denmark, http://www.riksrevisjonen.no/en/WhatsNew/NewsArchive/News_ Peer_review_of_the_National_Audit_Office_of_Denmark.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 23.09.2008
• Najwyzsza Izba Kontroli (2007), Peer Review Report, http://www.nik.gov.pl/docs/final_peer-review_report070118_en.pdf
• NCA (2007), Peer Review of the Netherlands Court of Audit, 29.03.2007, http://www.rekenkamer.nl/9282000/d/p408_peerreview_en.pdf?layout
• SAO (2008), Peer Review of the State Audit Office of Republic of Macedonia, www.dzr.gov.mk/en/ Erişim: 17.09.2008
• SIGMA (1999), Peer Review of the State Audit Office of Estonia, Paris, 24 July 1999. http://www.oecd.org/puma/sigmaweb.
• SIGMA (2002), Newsletter, March.
• SIGMA (2006), SIGMA Peer Assistance Review of the Lithuanian National Audit Office, SIGMA Summary Report, March, http://www.vkontrole.lt/en/docs/SIGMA_Summary_Report.pdf
• Treen, Nick (1999), Peer Review Identifies Ways to Strengthen External Audit, Public Management Forum, Vol. V, No: 5, September/October.
• Walker, David M. (2006), Enhancing Public Confidence: The GAO’s Peer Review Experience – Even auditors need to be audited, Journal of Accountancy, July.