Özellikler bağlamında girişimcinin beş faktör kişilik örüntüsü

Yeni bir firma kurmak veya çeşitli fırsatların farkına varma ve bunları kullanma kararlarında kişilik özelliklerinin bir rolünün olup olmadığı girişimcilik literatüründe tartışmalı bir konu olmuştur. Teorik açıdan ele alınan bu çalışma, girişimcilik faaliyetlerinde kişisel özelliklerin rolünü ortaya çıkararak, girişimcinin kişilik örüntüsünün nasıl olabileceğine odaklanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda özellikle günümüzde iş tatmini, liderlik ve iş performansı gibi örgütsel davranış alanlarında psikometrik geçerliliğini kanıtlamış olan beş faktör kişilik özellikleri irdelenmiştir. Bu doğrultuda literatürde kişilik özellikleriyle yapılan çalışmalarda elde edilen sonuçlar ışığında, girişimci kişinin dışa dönük, uyumluluğu düşük, özdisiplini yüksek, nevrotikliği düşük ve gelişime açık bir kişilik profili sergileyebileceği varsayılmıştır. Böylelikle mevcut çalışmanın, gelecekte yapılacak görgül araştırmalara ışık tutması yanında, özellik yaklaşımının girişimcilik literatüründe tekrar gözden geçirilmesi anlamında katkılar sağlayabileceği değerlendirilmiştir.

___

  • Ashford, S.J., ve Tsui, A.S., 1991. Self-regulation for Managerial Effectiveness: The role of Active Feedback Seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2): 251-280.
  • Bandura, A., 1982. Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37: 122-147.
  • Barrick, M.R. ve Mount, M.K., 1991. The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 41(1): 1-26.
  • Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., ve Judge, T.A., 2001. Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
  • Baum, J.R., ve Locke, E.A., 2004. The Relation of Entrepreneurial Traits, Skill, and Motivation to Subsequent Venture Growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4): 587-598.
  • Bausch, A., ve Rosenbusch, N., 2005. Does Innovation Really Matter? A meta-Analysis on the Relationship between Innovation and Business Performance,Babson College Kaufman Foundation Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Babson MA.
  • Borgatta, E.F., 1964. The Structure of Personality Characteristics Behavioral Science, 9: 8-17.
  • Caspi, A., Roberts B.W. ve Shiner R.L., 2005. Personality Development Stability and Change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56: 453-484. Cattell, R.B., 1956. Validation and Intensification of The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12(3): 205- 214.
  • Chen, C.C., Greene, P.G., ve Crick, A., 1998. Does Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy Distinguish Entrepreneurs from Managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13: 295-316.
  • Ciavarelia, M.A., Bucholtz, A.K., Riordan, CM., Gatewood, R.D., ve Stokes, G.S., 2004. The Big Five and Venture Success: Is there a Linkage? Journal of Business Venturing, 19: 465-483.
  • Collins, C.J., Hanges, P.J., Locke, E.E., 2004. The Relationship of Achievement Motivation to Entrepreneurial Behavior: A rneta-analysis, Humman Perform an ce, 17(1): 95-117.
  • Costa, P.T. ve McCrae, R.R., 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.
  • Cromie, S., 2000. Assessing Entrepreneurial intentions: Some Approaches and Empirical Evidence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(1): 7-30.
  • Dyer, W.G., 1994. Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Careers, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3): 7-21.
  • Eysenck, H.J., 1951. The Organization of Personality, Journal of Personality, 20(1): 101-107.
  • Frese, M., ve Fay, D., 2001. Personal initiative (PI): A Concept for Work in the 21st Century, Research in Organizational Behavior, 23: 133- 188.
  • Gartner, W.B., 1988. Who is an Entrepreneur? is the Wrong Question. Enirepreneurship Theory and Practice, 12(2): 47-68.
  • Gartner, W.B., .1985. A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation, Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 696-706.
  • Goldberg, L.R., 1990. An Alternative Description of Personality: The Big-Five Factor Structure. Journal of- Personality anol Social Psychology, 59: 1216-1229.
  • Hattrup, K., ve Jackson, S.E., 1996. Learning About "individual Differences by Taking Situations Seriously. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Heckhausen, J., ve Schulz, R., 1995. A Life-span Theory of Control, : Psychological Review, 102: 284-304.
  • Hunter, J.E., ve Schmidt, F.L., 2004. Methods for Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newhury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Hies, R., ve Gerhardt, M.W. 2002a. Personality and Leadership: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 765-780.
  • Judge, T.A., Heller, D., ve Mount, M.K. 2002b. Personality and Job Satisfaction: A Meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 530-541.
  • Lahti, R:K., 1999. Identifying and Integrating Individual Level and Organizational Level Core Competencies, Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(1): 59-75.
  • Lewin, K., 1951. Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper.
  • Lorrain, J., ve Dussault, L, 1988. Relation Between Psychological Characteristics, Administrative Behaviours and Success of Founder Entrepreneurs at the Start-up Stage, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 150-164.
  • Low, M.B., ve MacMillan, B.C., 1988. Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2): 139-162.
  • Lumpkin, G.T. ve Dess, G.G., 1996. Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance, Academy of Management Review, 21: 135-172.
  • McClelland, D., 1961. The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
  • McClelland, D.C. ve Burnham, D.H., 1995. Power is the Great Motivator, Harvard Business Review, 1: 127-139.
  • McClelland, D.C, 1986. Characteristics of Successful Entrepreneurs, Proceedings of the Third Creativity,Innovation and Entrepreneurship Symposium. Framingham, Mass. Washington D.C: US Small Business Administration, 219-233.
  • McCrae, R.R., Jang K.L., Livesley W.J., Riemann R. ve Angleitner A., 2001. Sources of Structure: Genetic, Environmental and Artifactual Influences on the Covariations of Personality Traits. Journal of Personality, 69(4): 511-535.
  • Mill, J.S., 1954. Principle of Political Economy with Some of Their Application to Social Philosophy. In J. A. Schumpeter (Ed.), History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mischel, W., 1968. Personality and Assessment. New York: Wiley.
  • Mount, M.K., Barrick M.R., Scullen S.M. ve Rounds J., 2005. Higher-Order Dimensions of The Big Five Personality Traits and The Big Six Vocational Interest Types. Personal Psychology, 58: 447-478.
  • Norman, W.T., 1963. Toward an Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attributes: Replicated Factor Structure in Peer Nomination Personality Ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66: 574-583
  • Ones, D.S. ve Viswesvaran, C, 1996. Bandwidth-Fidelity Dilemma in Personality Measurement for Personnel Selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17: 609-626.
  • Rotter, J.B., 1966. Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1): 1-20.
  • Schumpeter, J., 1935. Theory of Economic Development. 4th edition Munich, Leipzig: Von Dunckerand Humblot.
  • Seibert, S.E., ve Kraimer; M.L., 2001. The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Career Success, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58: 1-21.
  • Shane, S. ve Venkataraman, S., 2000. The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Journal, 25(1): 217- 226.
  • Shane, S., 2003. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The individual-Opportunity Nexus. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Press.
  • Shook, C.L., Priem, R.L. ve McGee, J.E., 2003. Venture Creation and the Enterprising Individual: A Review and Synthesis, Journal of Management, 29(3): 379-399.
  • Simon, M., Houghton, S.M., ve Aquino, K. 1999. Cognitive Biases, Risk Perception, and Venture Formation: How individuals Decide to Start Companies, Journal of Business Venturing, 15: 113-134.
  • Speier, C., ve Frese, M., 1997. Generalized Self-efficacy as a Mediator and Moderator between Control and Complexity at Work and Personal initiative: A Longitudinal Field Study in East Germany, Human Performance, 10: 171-192.
  • Stewart, W.H. ve Roth, P.L., 2001. Risk Propensity Differences between Entrepreneurs and Managers: A Meta-Analytic Review, Journal oi Applied Psychology, 86( 1): 145-153.
  • Utsch, A., Rauch, A., Rothful, R., ve Frese, M., 1999. Who Becomes a Small Scale Entrepreneur in an Post-socialistic Environment: On the Differences between Entrepreneurs and Managers in East Germany, Journal of Small Business Management, 37(3): 31-42.
  • Vinchur, A.J., Schippmann, J.S., Switzer, F.S.I., ve Roth, P.L, 1998. A Meta-Analytic Review of Predictors of Job Performance for Salespeople, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 586-597.
Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1303-6831
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2002
  • Yayıncı: Milli Savunma Üniversitesi Alparslan Savunma Bilimleri ve Millî Güvenlik Enstitüsü
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ÖZELLİKLER BAĞLAMINDA GİRİŞİMCİNİN BEŞ FAKTÖR KİŞİLİK ÖRÜNTÜSÜ

Fatih ÇETİN, A.Kadir VAROĞLU

A General Purpose Simulator for Unstructured P2P Networks and a Sample Application

Murat KARAKAYA, Özgür ULUSOY, İbrahim KÖRPEOĞLU

Birleşmiş Milletler kalkınma programı beşeri kalkınma endeksi verilerini kullanarak diskriminant analizi ve lojistik regresyon sınıflandırma performanslarının karşılaştırılması

Erkan OKTAY, Üstün ÖZEN, Serhat BURMAOĞLU

Kavramsal ve yapısal düzeyde öğrenme stillerine uyarlanan bilgisayar destekli alıştırmaların akademik başarıya etkisi

Paşa.Murat UYSAL

Almanya ve Türkiye'deki yerel yönetimlere karşılaştırmalı bir bakış

Mehmet GÜNEŞ

AĞIRLAŞTIRILMIŞ KOŞULLARDA YÜRÜTÜLEN EĞİTİM GÖREVLERİNDE SÜRAT STANDARTLARI İÇİN KABUL EDİLEBİLİR PERFORMANS KAYIPLARININ ANALİTİK AĞ PROSESİ UYGULAMASI İLE BELİRLENMESİ

Yusuf Celalettin YILMAZ, Saip Eren YILMAZ

Comparison of Night Vision Googles and Flir Systems in Airborne Applications

Hasan KOÇER, Önder Haluk TEKBAŞ, Gürhan BULU

AİLE-İŞ ÇATIŞMASI, İŞ STRESİ VE ÖRGÜTSEL SADAKATİN İŞ PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ: SAVUNMA SEKTÖRÜNDE AMPİRİK BİR ÇALIŞMA

Mazlum ÇELİK, Ömer TURUNÇ

Aile-iş çatışması,iş stresi ve örgütsel sadakatin iş performansına etkisi: Savunma sektöründe ampirik bir çalışma

Ömer TURUNÇ, Mazlum ÇELİK

KAVRAMSAL VE YAPISAL DÜZEYDE ÖĞRENME STİLLERİNE UYARLANAN BİLGİSAYAR DESTEKLİ ALIŞTIRMALARIN AKADEMİK BAŞARIYA ETKİSİ

Murat Paşa UYSAL