Sakarya ili için olasılığa dayalı sismik tehlike analizi

Bu çalışmada, Sakarya ilini etkileyen en güncel aktif deprem kaynakları etkisinde, pik yer ivmesine ait yıllık aşılma oranları, sismik tehlike eğrisi aracılığıyla hesaplanmıştır. Ayrıklaştırma analizi yapılarak, şehir merkezinde en çok etki oluşturabilecek olası fay uzaklıkları ve deprem büyüklükleri bulunmuştur. Bununla birlikte, bölgeye ait pik yer ivmesi, periyodu 0.2s ve 1.0s olan spektrum ivmelerinin, 50 yılda %10 ve %2 aşılma ihtimaline göre sismik tehlike haritaları elde edilmiştir. Tepki ivme spektrumundaki ivme değerleri, yönetmelik ile kıyaslandığında ortalama her periyod için 1.5-2 katı daha yüksek ivme değerleri elde edildiği görülmüştür.

Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the city of Sakarya

In this study, the probability of exceedance of peak ground acceleration are calculated by seismic hazard curves after compiling active faults around Sakarya province. Possible fault distances and earthquake magnitudes that affect the city center most, are determined by deaggregation analysis. In addition seismic hazard maps are derived for PGA and spectral accelerations at 0.2 and 1 s in terms of exceedance of 10% and 2% in 50 years. Compered the design spectrum, calculated acceleration response spectrum gave 1.5 to 2 times higher in average for all periods

___

  • [1] E. Seyrek ve H. Tosun, “Tehlike Analiz Yöntemlerinin Ülkemizdeki Büyük Beton Barajların Toplam Riski Üzerindeki Etkisi,” Gazi Üniversitesi Müh. Mim. Fak. Dergisi, cilt 28, no. 1, 67-75, 2013.
  • [2] K. Atakan, A. Ojeda, M. Meghraoui, A. A. Barka, M. Erdik ve A. Bodare, “Seismic Hazard in Istanbul following the 17 August 1999 Izmit and 12 November 1999 Düzce Earthquakes,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, cilt 1, no. 92, 466-482, 2002.
  • [3] M. Erdik, K. Demircioğlu, K. Şeşetyan, E. Durukal ve B. Siyahi, “Earthquake hazard in Marmara region, Turkey,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., cilt 1, no. 24, 605-631, 2004.
  • [4] H. Crowley ve J. J. Bommer, “Modeling seismic hazard inearthquake loss models with spatially distributed exposure,” Bull. Eq. Eng., no. 4, 249- 273, 2006.
  • [5] E. Kalkan, P. Gülkan, N. Yılmaz ve M. Çelebi, “Reassessment of probabilistic seismic hazard in the Marmara Region,” Bull. Seismol. Soc., cilt 99, no. 4, 2127-2146, 2009.
  • [6] R. S. Ocak, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of Eastern Marmara an evaluation of Turkish Earthquake Code Requirments, Ankara: ODTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2011.
  • [7] D. A. D. Başkanlığı, Türkiye Deprem Bölgeleri Haritası, Ankara: T.C. Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı, 1996.
  • [8] A. M. Sengör, “The North Anatolian Transform Fault: its age, offset and tectonic significance,” J. Geol. Soc., cilt 136, no. 2, 69-82, 1979.
  • [9] D. P. McKenzie, “Active tectonics of the Mediterranean region,” Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., cilt 30, no. 1, 9-85, 1972.
  • [10] A. A. Barka, “The North Anatolian Fault Zone,” Ann. Tecton, cilt 6, no. 1, 64-95, 1992.
  • [11] A A. Barka ve K. Kandinsky-Cade, “Strike-slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity,” Tectonics, cilt 7, no. 6, 63-84, 1988.
  • [12] A. A. Barka, “Slip distribution along the North Anatolian fault associated with the large earthquakes of the period 1939 to 1967,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., cilt 86, 1238-1254, 1996.
  • [13] R. S. Stein, A. A. Barka ve J. H. Dieterich, “Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering,” Geophys. J. Int., cilt 128, 594-604, 1997.
  • [14] Reilinger R., McClusky S., Vernant P., Lawrence S., Ergintav S., Cakmak R., Ozener H., Kadirov F., Guliev I., Stepanyan R., Nadariya M.,Hahubia G., Mahmoud S., Sakr K., ArRajehi A., Paradissis D., Al- Aydrus A., Prilepin M., Guseva T., Evren E., Dmitrotsa A., Filikov S.V., Gomez F., Al-Ghazzi R., Karam G., “GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa–Arabia–Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions,” J. Geophys. Res.111, B05411., 2006.
  • [15] A. A. Barka, H. S. Akyüz., E. Altunel, G. Sunal ve Z. Çakır, “The surface rupture and slip distribution of the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake (M 7.4), North Anatolian Fault,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., cilt 92, 43-60, 2002.
  • [16] H. S. Akyüz, Hartleb R., Barka A., Altunel E. ve Sunal G., “Surface rupture and slip distribution of the 12 November 1999 Düzce earthquake (M 7.1), North Anatolian Fault, Bolu, Turkey,,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., cilt 92, 61-66, 2002.
  • [17] C. Straub, H. G. Kahle ve C. Schindler, “GPS and geologic estimates of the tectonic activity in the Marmara Sea region, NWAnatolia,” J. Geophys. Res., cilt 102, no. 27, 587-601, 1997.
  • [18] S. McClusky ve 2. coauthors, “Global Positioning System constraintson,” J. Geophys. Res., cilt 105, 5695-5719, 2000.
  • [19] X. Le Pichon, “The active main Marmara fault, Earth Planet,” Sci. Lett., cilt 192, 595-616, 2001.
  • [20] N. Sayıl ve İ. Osmanşahin, “Marmara bölgesinin depremselliğinin incelenmesi,” Uluslararasu Deprem Sempozyumu, Kocaeli, 2005.
  • [21] N. N. Ambraseys, “Comparison of frequency of occurrence of earthquakes with slip rates from long-term seismicity data: the cases of Gulf of Corinth, Marmara Sea and Dead Sea Fault Zone,” Geophys. J. Int., cilt 165, no. 2, 516-526, 2006.
  • [22] P. Gülkan ve E. Kalkan, “Attenuation modeling of recent earthquakes in Turkey,” Journal of Seismology, cilt 6, no. 3, 397-409, 2002.
  • [23] R. Armijo, Pondard N., Meyer B., Mercier de LepInay B., Ucarkus G., Malavıeılle J., Dominguez S., Gustcher M-A. Beck, Çagatay N., Cakir Z., Imren C., Kadir E. and Natalin and Marmarascreps cruise party, “Submarine fault scarps in the Marmara Sea pull-apart (North Anatolian Fault): implications for seismic hazard in Istanbul,” Geochem., Geophys., Geosyst.,, cilt 6, 1-29, 2005.
  • [24] F. Saroğlu, O. Emre ve İ. Kuşçu, Active fault map of Turkey, Ankara: MTA, 1992.
  • [25] Ö. Emre, Doğan A., Duman T.Y., Özalp T., 1:250.000 Türkiye Diri Fay Haritaları Serisi, Ankara: MTA, 2012.
  • [26] S. Cambazoğlu, Preparation of a Source Model for the Eastern Marmara Region Along the North Anatolian Fault Segments and Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of Düzce Province., Ankara: Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ODTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2012.
  • [27] E. Harman ve H. S. Küyük, “Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the city of Sakarya,” Second European Conferance on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, İstanbul, 2014.
  • [28] B. Gutenberg ve C. H. Richter, “Frequency of earthquakes in California,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, cilt 34, 185- 188, 1944.
  • [29] D. H. Weichert, “Estimation Of The Earthquake Recurrence Parameters For Unequal Observation Periods For Different Magnitudes,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., cilt 70, no. 4, 1337-1346, 1980.
  • [30] M. Utkucu, E. Budakoğlu ve H. Durmuş, “Marmara Bolgesinde (KB Turkiye) depremsellik ve deprem tehlikesi uzerine bir tartışma,” Hacettepe Universitesi, Yerbilimleri Dergisi, cilt 32, no. 3, 187-212, 2011.
  • [31] H. Yalçın, L. Gülen, M. Utkucu, Türkiye ve Yakın Çevresinin Aktif Fayları Veri Bankası ve Deprem Tehlikesinin Araştırılması, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yerbilimleri Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Bülteni, Yerbilimleri, 34 (3), 133-160, 2013.
  • [32] N. A. Abrahamson ve W.J. Silva, “Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes,” Seismological Research Letters, cilt 68, no. 1, 94-127, 1997.
  • [33] D. M. Boore, “Equations For Estimating Horizontal Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration From Western North American Earthquakes: A Summary of Recent Work,” Seismological Research Letters, cilt 68, no. 1, 128- 153, 1997.
  • [34] K. W. Campbell ve Y. Bozorognia, “NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 s,” Earthquake Spectra, cilt 24, no. 1, 139-171, 2008.
  • [35] I. M. Idriss, “An NGA Empirical Model for Estimating the Horizontal Spectral Values Generated By Shallow Crustal Earthquakes,” Earthquake Spectra, cilt 24, no. 1, 217-242, 2008.
  • [36] L. Reiter, Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights, New York: Colombia University Press, 1990.
  • [37] E.-A. CAPRA, “Comprehensive Approach for Probabilistic Risk Assessment,” http://www. ecapra.org/.
  • [38] EZFRISK ®. 7.25, “Software for earthquake ground-motion estimation,,” Developed by Risk Engineering Inc., http://www.ezfrisk.com/index.html.
  • [39] J. P. Wang, D.R. Huang, C.T. Cheng , K.S. Shao, Y.C. Wu, C.W.Chang, “Seismic hazard analyses for Taipei city including deaggregation, design spectra, and time history with excel applications,” Computers & Geosciences, cilt 52, 146-154, 2013.
  • [40] J. P. Wang, D.R. Huang, Z.J. Yang, “Deterministic seismic hazard map for Taiwan developed using an in-house Excel-based program,” Computers & Geosciences, cilt 48, 111-116, 2012.
  • [41] C. A. Cornell, “Engineering seismic risk analysis,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, cilt 58, no. 5, 1583-1606, 1968.
  • [42] C. A. Cornell, H.Banon, A.F. Shakal, “Seismic motion and response prediction alternatives,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, cilt 7, 295-315, 1979.
  • [43] M. Erdik, K. Şeşetyan, M. B. Demircioğlu ve E. Durukal, Ulaştırma Bakanlığı Demiryolları, Limalar ve Havameydanları İnşaatı Genel Müdürlüğü Kıyı Yapıları, Demiryolları ve Hava meydanları İnşaatları Deprem Teknik Yönetmeliği için Deprem Tehlikesi Belirlemesi, İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Kandilli Rasathanesi ve Deprem Araştırma Enstitüsü, 2006.