EFFECTS OF GERMAN-TURKISH INDUSTRIAL POLICIES ON MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY COMPETITIVENESS

The main purpose of this study is to examine the effects of German-Turkish industry policies on manufacturing industry competitiveness. In accordance with this purpose, firstly, industrial policies of both countries will be discussed theoretically within the framework of Industry 4.0 basic approach. Secondly, the manufacturing industries of both countries will be compared in terms of selected indicators such as productivity, capacity utilization rates, value added, production index, R&D expenditures and employment. During the implemantation phase, the competitiveness of German-Turkish manufacturing industries in exports will be analyzed for the years 1996-2019, which covers the post-Customs Union period. SITC Rev.3, 3-digit product and / or product groups in the UN Commercial Statistics Database (UN Comtrade) are used as the data set for the analysis in question. Competitiveness values in exports for a total of 134 products and / or product groups with low, medium and high technology intensity according to technology levels are calculated separately for both countries and technology groups with Béla Balassa’s Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) Index. The answer of the question why German manufacturing industry exports between 1996 and 2018 is not strong or moderate and only weak compatitive in high technology density can be given with the shift of the production to Eastern countries especially to China due to the economic and geographical cost advantages. Turkey has moderate comparative advantage in exports by low technology intensity and weak competitive comparative advantage in exports in medium technology intensity.

EFFECTS OF GERMAN-TURKISH INDUSTRIAL POLICIES ON MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY COMPETITIVENESS

The main purpose of this study is to examine the effects of German-Turkish industry policies on manufacturing industry competitiveness. In accordance with this purpose, firstly, industrial policies of both countries will be discussed theoretically within the framework of Industry 4.0 basic approach. Secondly, the manufacturing industries of both countries will be compared in terms of selected indicators such as productivity, capacity utilization rates, value added, production index, R&D expenditures and employment. During the implemantation phase, the competitiveness of German-Turkish manufacturing industries in exports will be analyzed for the years 1996-2019, which covers the post-Customs Union period. SITC Rev.3, 3-digit product and / or product groups in the UN Commercial Statistics Database (UN Comtrade) are used as the data set for the analysis in question. Competitiveness values in exports for a total of 134 products and / or product groups with low, medium and high technology intensity according to technology levels are calculated separately for both countries and technology groups with Béla Balassa’s Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) Index. The answer of the question why German manufacturing industry exports between 1996 and 2018 is not strong or moderate and only weak compatitive in high technology density can be given with the shift of the production to Eastern countries especially to China due to the economic and geographical cost advantages. Turkey has moderate comparative advantage in exports by low technology intensity and weak competitive comparative advantage in exports in medium technology intensity.

___

  • AKKOYUNLU, A. & MIHCI, S. (2006): ‘‘Effects of Customs Union with European Union on the Market Structure and Pricing Behaviour of Turkish Manufacturing Industry’’, Applied Economics, Vol.: 38, Issue: 20.
  • ALTAY, B. & GURPINAR, K. (2008): ‘‘Açıklanmış Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlükler ve Bazı Rekabet Gücü Endeksleri: Türk Mobilya Sektörü Üzerine Bir Uygulama’’, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İ.İ.B.F Dergisi, Cilt:10, Sayı: 1, 2008, s. 257-274.
  • ATIYAS, İ. & BAKIS, O. (2015): ‘‘Structural Change and Industrial Policy in Turkey’’, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol.: 51, Issue: 6, pp. 1209-1229.
  • BALASSA, B. (1965): ‘‘Trade Liberalisation and ―Revealed‖ Comparative Advantage’’, The Manchester School, Vol.: 33, Issue:2, pp. 99-123.
  • BANGER, G. (2016): Endüstri 4.0 ve Akıllı İşletme, Ankara, Dorlion Yayınları.
  • BARTHOLOMAE, F. W. (2018): ‘‘Ökonomische Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung auf den internationalen Wettbewerb und die internationale Arbeitsteilung’’, Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge, Universität der Bundeswehr München.
  • BULUT, E. & AKCACI, T. (2017): ‘‘Endüstri 4.0 ve İnovasyon Göstergeleri Kapsamında Türkiye Analizi‘‘, ASSAM Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi, Sayı.:7, s. 50-72.
  • DOGRU, B.N. & MECIK, O. (2018): ‘‘Türkiye‘de Endüstri 4.0‘ın İşgücü Piyasasına Etkileri: Firma Beklentileri‘‘, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23, s. 1581- 1606.
  • EGILMEZ, M. (2018): Tarihsel Süreç İçerisinde Dünya Ekonomisi, İstanbul, Remzi Kitabevi, 2018.
  • ERBER, G. (2016): ‘‘Industrial Policy in Germany after the Global Financial and Economic Crisis’’, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1-38.
  • FERTÖ, I. & HUBBARD, L.G. (2003): ‘‘Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness in Hungarian Agri–Food Sectors’’, The World Economy, Vol.:26, Issue: 2, pp. 247-259.
  • HINLOOPEN, J. & MARREWIJK, C. (2001): ‘‘On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index’’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol.:137, Issue:1, pp.1-35.
  • ILO: ‘‘Annual growth rate of output per worker (GDP constant 2010 US $)’’, (Online) https://www.ilo.org/shinyapps/bulkexplorer1/?lang=en&segment=indicator&id=SDG_A821_NOC_RT_A, 15.07.2020.
  • INVESTOPEDIA: ‘‘Business: Business Essentials: Why You Should Invest in Research and Development (R&D)’’, (Çevrimiçi) https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/043015/what-arebenefits-research-and-development-company.asp, 10.08.2020.
  • KHATIBI, A. (2008): ‘‘Kazakhstan's revealed comparative advantage vis-à-vis the EU-27’’, ECIPE Working Paper, No. 03/2008, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE), Brussels, 2008.
  • KOC, E. & ET AL. (2018): ‘‘Dünyada ve Türkiye‘de Sanayileşme I - Strateji ve Temel Sanayileşme Sorunları’’, Mühendis ve Makina, Cilt: 59, Sayı: 690, s. 1-26.
  • KOC, E. & ET AL. (2017): ‘‘Türkiye‘de Ekonomik Göstergeler - İmalat Sanayi Kapasite Kullanım Oranı’’, Mühendis ve Makina, Cilt: 58, Sayı: 689, 2017, s. 1-22.
  • KOSE, A & ONCU A. (2000): ‘‘İşgücü piyasaları ve uluslararası işbölümünde uzmanlaşmanın mekânsal boyutları: 1980 sonrası dönemde Türkiye imalat sanayii’’, Toplum ve Bilim, Sayı: 86, s. 72-90.
  • KRZYWDZINSKI, M. (2016): ‘‘Technologie, Qualifikationen und internationale Arbeitsteilung: Anmerkungen zu der Diskussion über Industrie 4.0’’, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP III 2016-301, Berlin.
  • LALL, S. (2000): ‘‘The Technological Structure and Performance of Developing Country Manufactured Exports, 1985-1998’’, QEH Working Paper Series, Number:44..
  • LIPIETZ, A. (1998): Nach dem Ende des Goldenen Zeitalters: Regulation und Transformation kapitalistischer Gesellschaften, Ed., Hans Peter Krebs, Berlin-Hamburg, Argument Verlag.
  • MINISTRY OF DEVELOPMENT (2013): Onuncu Kalkınma Planı 2014-2018, Ankara.
  • NAYAK, S. & ET AL. (2013): ‘India‘s Manufacturing Exports Dynamics: An Analysis of Technology Intensity Transition’’, Working Paper, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade: Centre for WTO Studies (CWS), New Delhi, pp. 1-36.
  • OECD: ‘‘Business enterprise R&D expenditure by industry’’, (Online) https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=BERD_INDU, 03.06 2020
  • OECD: ‘‘Employment by Activity‘‘, (Online) https://data.oecd.org/emp/employment-by-activity.htm, 15.08.2020.
  • OECD: ‘‘GDP per hour worked’’, (Online) https://data.oecd.org/lprdty/gdp-per-hour-worked.htm, 10.06.2020 data.
  • OECD: ‘‘Industrial production: Manufacturing’’, (Online) https://data.oecd.org/industry/industrial-production.htm, 07.06.2020.
  • PORTER, M.E. (1990): Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York, The Free Press. SANDALCILAR, A.R. & YALMAN, İ.N. (2012): ‘‘Türkiye‘de Dış Ticaretteki Serbestleşmenin İşgücü Piyasaları Üzerindeki Etkileri’’, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 7, Sayı: 2.
  • SCHOBER, K.S. (2017): ‘‘Industry 4.0 – Challenge for the F&B industry in Turkey, advantage or competitive disadvantage?‘‘, Roland Berger –Siemens Digitalization in Food & Beverage Presentation, Istanbul, (Online) https://www.siemens.com.tr/i/Assets/gidagunu/170524_KS_Industrie40_Presentation_Siemens_Turkey.pdf
  • SHAHAB, S. & MAHMOOD, M.T. (2013): ‘‘Comparative Advantage of Leather Industry in Pakistan with Selected Asian Economies’’, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Vol.: 3, No: 1, pp. 133-139.
  • SOYAK, A. (2015): ‘‘Avrupa Birliği Sürecinde Türkiye Sanayi Politikası Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Yaklaşım’’, TMMOB Ölçü Dergisi, s. 61-69.
  • THE WORLD BANK:, ‘‘Manufactures exports (% of merchandise exports)”, (Online)https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.MANF.ZS.UN?locations=DE-TR, 10.07.2020
  • THE WORLD BANK: Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP) '' (Online) https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.IND.MANF.ZS?end=2018&locations=TR-DE&start= 1960 & view = chart, 05.04.2020.
  • TUNA, O. & YALCINTAS, N. (1999): Sosyal Siyaset, İstanbul, Filiz Kitabevi.
  • TUREK, J. (2016): ‘‘Industriepolitik‘‘, Jahrbuch der Europäischen Integration 2016, Ed., Werner Weidenfeld und Wolfgang Wessels, Baden-Baden, s. 259-262.
  • UN Comtrade Database: (Online) https://comtrade.un.org/data/, 10.07.2020 data.
  • URAS, G. (2017): Sanayileşecektik Büyüyecektik N’oldu Bize, İstanbul, Doğan Kitap.
  • VDA (2019): ‘‘Economic Policy and Infrastructure: Trade’’, (Online), https://www.vda.de/en/topics/economic-policy-andinfrastructure/trade/importance-of-trade-policy-for-industryand-for-germany-as-an-industrial-location.html, 20.06.2020..
  • WIEGAND, B. (2018): Der Weg aus der Digitalisierungsfalle: Mit Lean Management erfolgreich in die Industrie 4.0, Wiesbaden, SpringerGabler.
  • WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (2019): World Trade Statistical Review.
Sakarya İktisat Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0790
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Sakarya Üniversitesi