MAKSİLLER MOLAR DİŞLERDEKİ KÖK KANAL SAYISI İNSİDANSININ OPERASYON MİKROSKOBU İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: İN VİVO

Bu çalışmanın amacı, operasyon mikroskobu (OM) kullanılarak maksiller molar dişlerde bulunan kanalların sayısının yüzdesel oranının ve kanal anatomisinin incelenmesi, Türk toplumunda cinsiyete ve yaşa göre farklılıkların belirlenmesidir. Çalışmada Erciyes Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Diş Hastalıkları ve Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı kliniğine başvuran hastalardan maksiller molar dişlerine kök kanal tedavisi endikasyonu konulanlar yer aldı. Çalışma kapsamına 85 kadın, 113 erkek toplam 198 hasta dahil edildi. Kanallar OM kullanılarak belirlendi. Dördüncü kanal görülme oranı % 35.3 idi. Yaş gruplarının istatistiksel olarak karşılaştırılması sonucunda anlamlı farklılıkların olduğu tespit edildi. Tüm gruplar değerlendirildiğinde kanal sayısındaki değişikliğin cinsiyetler arasında farklılık göstermediği belirlendi. Sonuç olarak, maksiller molar dişler içinde dördüncü kanal görülme oranının yüksek olduğu bu nedenle bu dişlerin endodontik tedavileri sırasında mevcut olandan bir fazla kanalın araştırılması gerektiği kanısına varıldı. Ayrıca yaşla birlikte dentin depozisyonun artması nedeniyle dördüncü kanal görülme oranında bir azalma meydana geldiği belirlendi

The Evaluation of the Incidence of Root Canal in Maxillary Molar Teeth Using Dental Operating Microscope: In vivo

The aim of this study is to determine the percentage of root canals to study the root canal anatomy of maxillary molar teeth and identify the differences in sex and age, in Turkish population using operating microscope (OM). In this study the patients who applied to Erciyes University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics to racaive root canal treatment to maxillary molar teeth are included. Eighty five female, 113 male, a total of 198 patients were included in the study. The canals were detected using OM. The incidence of forth canal in molar teeth is % 35.3. Statistically significant differences were found between the age groups. However, there was no statistically significant difference between two genders in terms of the root canal numbers. As a result, it was concluded that the incidence of the fourth canal in maxillary molar teeth is very high and therefore one more canal than the existing one should always be searched during their endodontic treatments. Also due to the dentin deposition with age, it is determined that the incidence of the fourth canal decreases

___

  • Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, Wenckus CS. Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod 2002, 28: 324-327.
  • Thomas RP, Moule AJ, Bryant R. Root canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molar teeth at various ages. Int Endod J 1993, 26: 257-267.
  • Alavi AM, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Root and canal morphology of Thai maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2002, 35: 478-485.
  • Weine FS, Hayami S, Hata G, Toda T. Canal configuration of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar of a Japanese sub- population. Int Endod J 1999, 32: 79-87.
  • al Shalabi RM, Omer OE, Glennon J, Jennings M, Claffey NM. Root canal anatomy of maxillary first and second permanent molars. Int Endod J 2000, 33: 405-414.
  • Gorduysus MO, Gorduysus M, Friedman S. Operating microscope improves negotiation of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars. J Endod 2001, 27: 683-686.
  • Yoshioka T, Kikuchi I, Fukumoto Y, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Detection of the second mesiobuccal canal in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molar teeth ex vivo. Int Endod J 2005, 38: 124-128.
  • Baldassari- Cruz LA, Lily JP, Rivera EM. The influence of dental operating microscope in locating the mesiolingual canal orifice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002, 93: 190-194.
  • Kulild JC, Peters DD. Incidence and configuration of canal systems in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first and second molars J Endod 1990, 16: 311-317.
  • Gilles J, Reader A. An SEM investigation of the mesiolingual canal in human maxillary first and second molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1990, 70: 638-643.
  • Ting PC, Nga L. Clinical detection of the minor mesiobuccal canal of maxillary first molars. Int Endod J 1992, 25: 304-306.
  • Fogel HM, Peikoff MD, Christie WH. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar: a clinical study. J Endod 1994, 20: 135-137.
  • Henry BM. The forth canal: its incidence in maxillary first molars. J Can Dent Assoc 1993, 59: 995-996.
  • Neaverth EJ, Kotler LM, Kaltenbach RF. Clinical investigation (in vivo) of endodontically treated maxillary first molars. J Endod 1987, 13: 506-512.
  • Barbizam JV, Ribeiro RG, Tanomaru Filho M. Unusual anatomy of permanent maxillary molars. J Endod 2004, 30: 668-671.
  • Caliskan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetcioglu F, Turkun M, Tuncer SS. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod 1995, 21: 200-204.
  • Imura N, Hata GI, Toda T, Otani SM, Fagundes MI. Two canals in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars. Int Endod J 1998, 31: 410-414.
  • Pecora JD, Woelfel JB, Sousa Neto MD. Morphologic study of the maxillary molars. Braz Dent J 1992, 3: 53-57.
  • Sert S, Bayırlı GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod 2004, 30: 391- 398.
  • Yang ZP, Yang SF, Lee G. The root and root canal anatomy of maxillary molars in a Chinese population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988, 4: 215-218.
  • Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984, 58: 589-599.
  • Zürcher E. The anatomy of the root-canals of the teeth of the deciduous dentition and of the first permanent molars, part 2. New York: William Wood and Co, 1925.
  • Okamura T. Anatomy of the root canals. J Am Dent Assoc 1927, 14: 632-636.
  • Kulid J, Peters D. Incidence and configuration of canal systems in the mesio-buccal root of maxillary first and second molars. J Endod 1990, 16: 311-317.
  • Nosonowitz DM, Brenner MR. The major canals of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary 1st and 2nd molars. N Y J Dent 1973, 43: 12- 15.
  • Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review. J Endod 2006, 32: 813-821.
  • Sempira HN, Hartwell GR. Frequency of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars as determined by use of an operating microscope: a clinical study. J Endod 2000, 26: 673-674.
  • Stropko JJ. Canal morphology of maxillary molars: clinical observations of canal configurations. J Endod 1999, 25: 446-450.
  • Christie WH, Peikoff MD, Fogel HM. Maxillary molars with two palatal roots: a retrospective clinical study. J Endod 1991, 17: 80-84.
  • Hartwell G, Bellizzi R. Clinical investigation of in vivo endodontically treated mandibular and maxillary molars. J Endod 1982, 8: 555- 557.
  • Slowey RR. Radiographic aids in the detection of extra root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974, 37: 762-772.
  • Zaatar El, al-Kandari AM, Alhomaidah S, al- Yasin IM. Frequency of endodontic treatment in Kuwait: radiographic evaluation of 846 endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1997, 23: 453-456.
  • Ross IF, Evanchik PA. Root fusion in molars: incidence and sex linkage. 1981, 62: 663-667.
  • Sert S, Bayırlı GS. Taurodontism in six molars: a case report. J Endod 2004, 30: 601- 602.
  • Weller RN, Hartwell GR. The impact of improved Access and searching techniques on detection of the mesiolingual canal in maxillary molars. J Endod 1989, 15: 82-83.
  • Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Detection rate of root canal orifices with a microscope. J Endod 2002, 28: 452-453.
  • Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S. Clinical investigation of second mesiobuccal canals in endodontically treated and retreated maxillary molars. J Endod 2002, 28: 477-479.
  • Lane AJ. The course and incidence of multiple canals in the mesio- buccal root of the maxillary molar. J Br Endod Soc 1974, 7: 9- 11.