___

• Argyri, E. and Sorace, A. (2007). Crosslinguistic influence and language dominance in older bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 77–99.
• Belletti, A. (2001). Inversion as focalization. Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, 60–90.
• Belletti, A. (2004) Aspects of the low IP area. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 2 (pp. 16–51). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Bialystok, E. (1991). Metalinguistic dimensions of bilingual language proficiency. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children. 113–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language Literacy and Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Bialystok, E. (2007). Cognitive effects of bilingualism: How linguistic experience leads to cognitive change. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10 (3), 210–223
• Bini M. (1993). La adquisición del italiano: más allá de las propiedades sintácticas del parámetro prodrop. In J.M Liceras (Ed), La linguística y el análisis de los sistemas no nativos, 126–139. Ottawa: Dovehouse.
• Carminati, Maria Nella (2002). The Processing of Italian Subject Pronouns. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts
• Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2011). Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, tense morphology and morpho-syntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1 (3) 223–248
• Costa, A., Santesteban, M. (2004) Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language 50 (2004) 491–511
• Domínguez, L. (2013). Understanding Interfaces: Second language acquisition and first language attrition of Spanish subject realization and word order variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
• Donaldson, B. (2011b). Nativelike right-dislocations in near-native French. Second Language Research, 27, 361–390.
• Donaldson, B. (2012). Syntax and discourse in near-native French: Clefts and focus. Language Learning, 62, 902–930.
• Erguvanlı, E. 1984. The Function of Word Order in Turkish Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Geber, D., 2006. Processing subject pronouns in relation to non-canonical (Quirky) constructions. Ottawa Papers in Linguistics 34, 47–61.
• Howell, D. (2007). Statistical Methods for Psychology . Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Belmont: CA
• Hulk, A. & Müller, N. (2000). Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3 (3), 227–244.
• Isever, S. 2003. Information structure in Turkish: the word order-prosody interface. Lingua, 113, 1025– 1053.
• Ivanov, I. P. L2 acquisition of Bulgarian clitic doubling: A test Case for the Interface Hypothesis. Second Language Research.Vol. 28, No. 3 (July 2012): 345-368
• Iverson, M., Kempchinsky, P., & Rothman, J. (2008.) Interface vulnerability and knowledge of the subjunctive/indicative distinction with negated epistemic predicates in L2 Spanish. EUROSLA Yearbook, 8:135–163.
• Jackendoff, R. (2007). A Parallel Architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research, 1146, 2–22.
• Jaeggli, O. and Safir, K (1989): The Null Subject Parameter and Parametric Theory. In: O. Jaeggli & K. Safir, eds., The Null Subject Parameter. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
• Kornfilt, J. (1984). Case Marking, Agreement and Empty Categories in Turkish. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.
• Kraš, T. (2008). Anaphora resolution in near-native Italian grammars: Evidence from native speakers of Croatian. Eurosla Yearbook, 8 (1),107–134
• Kraš,T. (2016). Cross-linguistic influence at the discourse–syntax interface: Insights from anaphora resolution in child second language learners of Italian. International Journal of Bilingualism 20 (4), 369 – 385
• Lozano, C. (2006). Focus and split intransitivity: the acquisition of word order alternations in nonnative Spanish. Second Language Research, 22, 1–43.
• Lozano, C. (2006a). The development of the syntax-discourse interface: Greek learners of Spanish. In V. Torrens & L. Escobar (eds.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages, 371–399. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
• Malakoff, M. & K. Hakuta. (1991). Translation skill and metalinguistic awareness in bilinguals. In E. Bialystok (ed.), Language processing in bilingual children, 141–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Margaza, P., & Bel, A. (2006). Null Subjects at the Syntax-Pragmatics Interface: Evidence from Spanish Interlanguage of Greek Speakers. In M. Graham O’Brien, C. Shea, & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006),88–9). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
• Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
• Muller, N. & Hulk, A. (2001) Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as a recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 1–21.
• Pinto, M. (1997). Licensing and Interpretation of Inverted Subjects in Italia. Utrecht: Utrechts Instituut voor Linguistiek .
• Platzak, C. (1999). Multiple interfaces. In U. Nikanne & E.vad der Zee (Eds.), Conceptual structure and its interfaces with other modules of rappresentation. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Rizzi L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
• Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2008). Online Pronoun Resolution In L2 Discourse: L1 Influence and General Learner Effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30 (03), 333– 357.
• Rothman, J. & M. Inverson (2007). On L2 clustering and resetting the Null-Subject Parameter in L2 Spanish: Implications and Observations. Hispania 90 (2): 329-342.
• Serratrice, L., A. Sorace, & S. Paoli. (2004). “Subjects and objects in ItalianEnglish bilingual and monolingual acquisition”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7. 183–206.
• Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., Filiaci, F. and Baldo, M. (2009). Bilingual children's sensitivity to specificity and genericity: evidence from metalinguistic awareness. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12: 239–267.
• Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., Filiaci, F. And Baldo, M. (2012). Pronominal objects in English–Italian and Spanish–Italian bilingual children’, Applied Psycholinguistics, 33 (4), pp. 725–751
• Sorace, A. 2003. Near-nativeness. In M. Long and C. Doughty (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 130–152. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Sorace, A. 2016. Referring expressions and executive functions in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism,
• Sorace, A. and Serratrice, L. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13: 195–210.
• Sorace, A., Serratrice, L. Filiaci, F. and Baldo, M. 2009. Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: testing the linguistic intuitions of older bilingual children. Lingua 119: 460–477.
• Sorace, A.2005: Selective optionality in language development. In Cornips, L. and Corrigan, K., editors, Biolinguistic and sociolinguistic accounts of syntactic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamin, 55– 80.
• Tsimpli, I. (2007). First language attrition from a minimalist perspective: Interface vulnerability ad processing effects. In B. Köpke, M. Schmid, M. Keijzer & S. Dostert (Hgg.) (2007). Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 83–98.
• Tsimpli, I., A. Sorace, C. Heycock & F. Filaci (2004). First language attrition and syntactic subjects: a study of Greek and Italian near- native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism 8. 157–177.
• Tsimpli, T. Sorace, A., Heycock, C. and Filiaci, F. 2004. First language attrition and syntactic subjects: a study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism 8: 257–277. Underhill, R. (1972). ‘Turkish participles.’ Linguistic Inquiry 3, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 87–99 Unsworth, S. (2014): Assessing the role of amount and timing of exposure in simultaneous bilingual development and ultimate attainment Bilingualism: Language and Cognition: 181-201 Wilson, F., Sorace, A., & Keller, F. (2009). Antecedent preferences for anaphoric demonstratives in L2 German. In J. Chandlee, M. Franchini, S. Lord, & G-M. Rheiner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. pp.634–645. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Zobl, H., and Liceras, J. (1994). Functional categories and acquisition orders. Language Learning, 44, 159–180