Categorızıng hıstorıography: Turkısh-armenıan relatıons throughout hıstory1

Türkler ve Ermeniler arasında tarih sağlam başlayıp sorunlu hale gelmiştir. Antik çağlarda sıkı bir ticarî bağı ile başlayan Ermeni-Türk ilişkisi, Selçuklular’ın Anadolu’ya yerleşmesiyle ortaklaşır ve böyle gelişmeye devam eder. Selçuklu döneminden sonra, Ermeniler Ortaçağı’ndan sonra Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun himayesine girerler. İmparatorluğun sonu geldiğinde, tıpkı Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun diğer azınlıklarında olduğu gibi, bazı kışkırtıcı milliyetçilik akımları, sürtüşmelere yol açar. Bu sürtüşme milliyetçi Ermeniler ve sadık Osmanlılar arasında ortaya çıkan gerginliğe yol açmıştır. Söz konusu gerginlik döneminde birçok olaylar gerçekleşmiştir. Bu makalenin amacı, Osmanlı’nın son dönemlerinde ortaya çıkan Türk-Ermeni çatışması ve günümüzde bu çatışma ile ilgili olarak yapılan bilimsel tartışmalara ışık tutmaktır. Yazının ilk bölümü Osmanlı dönemi öncesi Ermeniler ve Türkler arasındaki uzun geçmişe ışık tutmayı amaçlamaktadır. Ardından bu konuda çalışma yürüten farklı bilim adamlarının görüşleri ve yazarları incelenmektedir. Ayrıca bu tarihi olaylarda tartışma konusu olan bir kaç noktaya vurgu yapılmaktadır. Önem verilmesi gereken iki temel tartışma noktası vardır. Birincisi Osmanlı hükümetinin belli bir etnik grubun imhası için düzenleme yapıp soykırım çalışmaları başlatmış olması için herhangi bir kanıtın bulunmadığıdır. İkinci olarak ölü sayısı büyük bir muamma olarak geçmektedir ve o yüzden tartışılan önemli bir konudur. Takip eden bölümde, Türk-Ermeni olaylarında sınırlar ötesi etnik boyutların etkisi ele alınmaktadır. Bu sorun sadece Osmanlı İmparatorluğu veya sadece Rus İmparatorluğu içerisinde gerçekleşen bir sorun olmamıştır. O yüzden bu konuya bakarken tüm arşivleri ele almak gerekmektedir. Buna odaklanmadan 1885 yılından 1916 yılına kadar olanları sıralayıp o dönemin çerçevesini oluşturmak gerekiyor. Makale 1915 yılında büyük tartışma noktası olan tehcir kararını yakından incelemekte, son bölümde ise, daha önce bahsettiğimiz farklı ülkelerin arşivlerine bakılarak, birincil kaynaklardan bahsedilmektedir Bu kaynaklar bazen doğru kullanılmamıştır, bazen de çarptırılmıştır. Bu nedenden dolayı birincil kaynaklardan sonra, tartışmalı olan ikincil kaynaklar incelenmektedir.

Historiografinin kategorileştirilmesi: Tarih boyunca Türk-Ermeni ilişkileri

The history between Turks and Armenians has been a sturdy one. Although it begins with a steady trade relation in ancient times, it develops into a joint history after the Seldjuks settle in Anatolia. After the Seldjuk period, Armenians became subjects of the Ottoman Empire from the Middle Ages onwards. At the end of the Ottoman Empire, friction between the various inhabitants of the Ottoman Empire led to friction between nationalist Armenians and Ottomans. It eventually led to a violent outbreak of attacks from Armenian guerrilla groups on various Ottoman targets. In current times, these historical facts have been misinterpreted or even misused. This article tries to categorize the scholars that have occupied themselves with the study of the Armenians in the late Ottoman period, especially the controversy surrounding the alleged genocide during the Armenian Relocation of 1915 and the Armenian Revolt in prior years beginning in the end of the nineteenth century. This article aims to shed light on the long history of controversy between Armenians and Turks in the late Ottoman period. The article starts with the analyses of scholars and categorizing them accordingly. Furthermore, the various disputes on the issue are examined. The most heard disputes are related to the following points. For one, there is the statement that – so far – there is no proof that the Ottoman government was in any way involved in an organized system of annihilation of a particular ethnic group. Secondly, the number of deaths is also a major subject of discussion. Following these discussions, the trans-ethnic aspect is taking into account during this article. Another important aspect is off course the context of that specific time period. A short overview of the events that occurred during the years 1885 until 1916,are also provided in this article. The relocation itself is also touched upon in detail. The feedback of primary sources, and the highly disputed second-hand sources wrap up this article.

___

  • AKÇAM Taner, A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and the question of Turkish responsibility (New York 2006)
  • AKÇAM, Taner, De Armeense Genocide: een reconstructie [The Armenian Genocide: a reconstruction] (Amsterdam 2007)
  • AKTAN, Gündüz, ‘Devletler Hukukuna Göre Ermeni Sorunu’ [The Armenian Question according to international law], in: Lütem, Ömer Engin (ed.), Ermeni Sorunu: Temel Bilgiler ve Belgeler [The Armenian Question: Basic Knowledge and Documentation] (Ankara 2009), p. 149- 187
  • AURON, Yair, The Banality of Denial: Israel and the Armenian Genocide (Transaction 2004)
  • BAKKER, René; Gailly, Antoon & Vervloet, Luc, Geschiedenis van Turkije [The history of Turkey] (Amsterdam 1997)
  • BOEKESTIJN, Arend-Jan, “Turkey, the World and the Armenian Question”, in: Turkish Policy Quarterly, Winter 2005, Vol. 4, No. 4
  • CLEVELAND, William L., A History Of The Modern Middle East (Westview 1994)
  • CONROY, Mary Schaeffer, “Review of Vahakn N. Dadrian, Warrant for Genocide: Key Elements of Turko-Armenian Conflict”, in: The Social Science Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, p. 481-483
  • DADRIAN, Vahakn N., The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus (Oxford 1995)
  • DETREZ, Raymond, “Tussen betrokkenheid en distantie: De Armeense genocide” [Between involvement and distance: The Armenian genocide], in: de leeswolf, No. 7, October 2007
  • DUMONT, Paul, “The Death of an Empire (1908-1923)”, in Robert Mantran (ed.), Histoire de l’Empire Ottoman [The history of the Ottoman Empire] (Paris 1989)
  • DUNÉR, Bertil, “What Can Be Done About Historical Atrocities? The Armenian Case”, in: The International Journal of Human Rights, Summer 2004, Vol. 8, No. 2
  • DYER, Gwynne, Armenia: The End of the Debate? (London 2009)
  • ERICKSON, Edward J., “Armenian Massacres: New Records Undercut Old Blame”, in: The Middle East Quarterly, Summer 2006, Vol. 13, No. 3
  • ERICKSON, Edward J., Ordered to Die: A History of the Ottoman Army in the First World War (Greenwood 2001)
  • FARGUES, Phillip & Courbage, Youssef, Christians and Jews under Islam (Tauris 1998)
  • GAILLY, Antoon (see: Bakker, René)
  • GUENTER, Lewy, The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey: A Disputed Genocide (Utah 2005)
  • GUNTER, Michael M., Pursuing the Just Cause of Their People: A Study of Contemporary Armenian Terrorism (Greenwoord 1986)
  • GÜRUN, Kamuran, Ermeni Dosyası [The Armenian File] (Ankara 1983)
  • GÜRUN, Kamuran, The Armenian File (İstanbul 2007)
  • HENZE, Paul, “The Roots of Armenian Violence. How Far Back Do they Extend?”, in: International Terrorism and the Drug Connection (Ankara 1984), p. 179-202
  • JÄCKEL, Eberhard,” Genozid oder nicht? Hunderttausende Armenier kamen 1915/16 wohl ohne Absicht um” [Genocide or not? Hundred thousands of Armenians died in 1915/16 without any intent], in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, March 23, 2006
  • KARENTZ, Varoujan, Mitchnapert the Citadel: A History of Armenians in Rhode Island (iUniverse 2004)
  • KARPAT, Kemal, “Bir milyon Ermeni 1917’de kuzeye göç etti” [One million Armenians migrated to the north in 1917], in: IKTAM, June 1, 2009
  • KAZEMZADEH, Firuz, The Struggle for Transcaucasia (Oxford 1952)
  • KEREM, Yitzchak, “Online Interview by Luke Ford”, on: lukeford.net (March 16th, 2009)
  • LANGER, William L., The Diplomacy of Imperialism (New York 1935)
  • LEWIS, Bernard, “There Was No Genocide: Interview with Professor Bernard Lewis”, in: Ha’aretz Weekly, January 23, 1998
  • LEWIS, Bernard, Het Midden-Oosten: 2000 jaar culture en politieke geschiedenis [The Middle East: 2000 years of cultural and political history] (Amsterdam 2002)
  • LOWRY, Heath W., “The U.S. Congress and Adolf Hitler on the Armenians”, in: Political Communication and Persuasion, 1985, Vol. 3, No. 2
  • LOWRY, Heath W., The Story Behind Ambassador Morghentau’s Story (Isis Press 1990)
  • MANGO, Andrew, Atatürk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey (Cambridge 1999)
  • MANSFIELD, Peter, A History Of The Middle East (Londen 1991)
  • MANTRAN, Robert, Histoire de la Turquie [The History of Turkey] (PUF 1952)
  • MCCARTHY, Justin, The Armenian Rebellion at Van (Utah 2006)
  • MESROBIAN, Arpena S., Like One Family: The Armenians of Syracuse (Gomidas Institute 2000)
  • MIHRAN Kurdoghlian, Badmoutioun Hayots, C. hador [Armenian History, volume III] (Athens 1996)
  • MUNOZ, Antonio J. & Valentinovich, Oleg, The East Came West: Muslim, Hindu and Buddhist Volunteers in the German Armed Forces 1941-1945 - A Study of East European Middle Eastern Collaboration with the German Armed Forces In World War II (New York 2001)
  • ÖZGER, Yunus, 1895 Bayburt Ermeni Ayaklanmaları [The 1895 Armenian Uprisings in Bayburt] (İstanbul 2007)
  • ÖZGÖNÜL, Cem, Der Mythos eines Völkermordes: eine kritische Betrachtung der Lepsiusdokumente sowie der deutschen Rolle in Geschichte und Gegenwart der armenischen Frage [The myth of a Genocide: a critical examination of the Lepsius documents and the German role in history as well as present within the Armenian Question] (Köln 2006)
  • ÖZKAN, Zafer, The Armenian Question from terror to policy (Istanbul 2001)
  • ÖZTUNA, Yılmaz, “The Political Milieu of the Armenian Question”, in: Ataöv, Türkkaya, Armenians in the Late Ottoman Period (Ankara 2002), p. 43-64
  • PERİNÇEK, Mehmet (ed.), Rus Kafkas Ordusu Kurmay Başkanı Tuğgeneral L. M. Bolhovitinov – 11 Aralık 1915 Tarihli Resmi Ermeni Raporu [Chairman of the Russian Caucasus Division, Brigadier General L. M. Bolhovitinov – The Official Armenian Report, dated December 11th 1915] (İstanbul 2009)
  • PICON, Leon, “Armenian “Hitler Quote” Proven To Be Fabrication”, in: ATA-USA, Fall 1985/Winter 1986
  • POPE, Stephen & Wheal, Elizabeth-Anne, Dictionary of the First World War (New York 1996)
  • RADU, Michael S., The Dangers of the Armenian Genocide Resolution (Foreign Policy Research Institute, 2007)
  • SACHAR, Howard M., The Emergence of the Middle East: 1914-1924 (New York 1969)
  • SALT, Jeremy, “Forging the past: OUP and the ‘Armenian question”, in: Eurasia Critic (January 2010)
  • SALT, Jeremy, The Unmaking of the Middle East: A History of Western Disorder in Arab Lands (California 2008)
  • SEGEV, Tom, “Mozart and the Armenian genocide”, in: Haaretz Daily News, October 18, 2007
  • SHAW, Stanford J., History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, Vol. 2/2 (Cambridge 1977)
  • STEWART-SMITH, Geoffrey, The defeat of communism (Ludgate 1964)
  • STONE, Norman, “What has this genocide to do with Congress?”, in: The Spectator, London 2007
  • STRACHAN, Hew, First World War, (New York 2004)
  • ŞAHİN, Erman, “A Scrutiny of Akçam’s Version of History”, in: Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, August 2008, Vol. 28, No. 2
  • ŞİMŞİR, Bilal, The Deportees of Malta and The Armenian Allegations (Ankara 2003)
  • T.C. Genelkurmay Başkanlığı, Gördüklerim Yaşadıklarım [What I saw and lived through] (Ankara 2007)
  • TASHJI, Edward, Armenian Allegations – The Truth Must be Told (reprint by Rose 2005)
  • TOYNBEE, Arnold, The Western Question in Greece and Turkey: A Study in the Contact of Civilizations (Constable 1922)
  • ÜNGÖR, Uğur Ümit, “Armeense Genocide en toetreding” [The Armenian Genocide and accession], in: Friesch Dagblad, December 28, 2006
  • ÜNGÖR, Uğur Ümit, “De Armeense genocide” [The Armenian Genocide], in: De Helling, 2007/2
  • ÜNGÖR, Uğur Ümit, Vervolging, Onteigening en Vernietiging: de deportatie van Ottomaanse Armeniërs tijdens de Eerste Wereldoorlog [Persecution, Expropriation and Destruction: the deportation of Ottoman Armenians during the First World War] (Soesterberg 2007)
  • VAN DER LINDE, Dirk, “The Armenian Genocide Question & Legal Responsibillity” in Review of Armenian Studies, No: 24, (2011)
  • VEINSTEIN, Gilles, Trois questions sur un massacre [Three questions concerning a massacre], in: L’Histoire, No. 187 (April 1995)
  • VERVLOET, Luc (see: Bakker, René)
  • WHEAL, Elizabeth-Anne (see: Pope, Stephen)
  • WILIAMS, Brain G., Letter to the Toronto District School Board (January 31, 2008)
  • YAPP, Malcolm E., The Making of the Modern Near East: 1792–1923 (New York 1987)
  • ZARCONE, Thierry, La Turquie: De l’Empire Ottoman à la République d’Atatürk [Turkije: Het Osmaanse Rijk en de Republiek van Atatürk] (Paris 2005)
  • ZEIDNER, Robert F., The Tricolor over the Taurus (Ankara 2005)
  • ZÜRCHER, Erik-Jan, Turkey: A Modern History (London 2004)
  • FO 371/6504/E.8515: Craigie, British Charge d’ Afaires at Washington, to lord Curzon, No.722 of 13.7.1921
  • BBC/Discovery Channel, First World War: Jihad 1914 - 1916 (part 4 of 10) (2003)
  • ‘Fact sheet: Armenian Genocide’, from the University of Michigan- Dearborn, April 3, 1996 BBC/Discovery
Review of Armenian Studies-Cover
  • ISSN: 1303-5304
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2002
  • Yayıncı: Terazi Yayıncılık Basım Dağıtım Danışmanlık Eğitim Organizasyon Matbaacılık Kırtasiye Tic. Ltd. Şti.