When the demand for educational research meet practice

Öz The objective in this article is to explore how this demand can emerge in an action research project as well as in school principals’ daily life. This is done in form of a case study were a group of principals enters a partnership with a researcher in their quest to apply a scientific approach in their own and, in their teachers’ professions. This study provide a pertinent example of how a this demand can emerge in practice. The theory of practice architectures (Kemmis & Grootenboer, 2008) is used as an analytical framing. The research questions are as follows: 1) How do the principals understand and realise the demand of an enhanced scientific foundation in their schools? 2) What happens when a group of principals and a researcher enters a partnership? 3) What practice architecture affect the partnership between the principals and the researcher? 4) What practice architecture affect the principals leadership actions in their schools?

Kaynakça

Anderson, G. L., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28 (5), 12-21

Alvesson, M. (2013). Organisation och ledning: ett något skeptiskt perspektiv. [Organization and leadership: a rather sceptical perspective] Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.

Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012) Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human relations, 65(3), 367-390

Biesta, G. (2019). Reclaiming teaching for teachers education: Towards a spiral curriculum. Beijing international review of education (1), 259-272

Bridges, D., & Jonathan, R. (2008). Education and the market. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education (pp. 126–145). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education knowledge and action research. London, UK: Falmer Press.

Carr, W. (2009). Practice without theory? A postmodern perspective on educational practice. In B. Green (red.), Understanding and researching professio0nal practice (pp. 55-64). Netherlands: Rotterdam: Sense Publisher

Crossouard, B., & Pryor, J. (2012). How theory matters: Formative assessment theory and practices and their different relations to education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(3), 251–263.

Flygare, E., Frånberg, G.-M., Gill, P., Johansson, B., Lindberg, O., Osbeck, C., & Söderström, Å. (2011). Utvärdering av metoder mot mobbning. [Evaluation of methods against bullying] Stockholm, Sweden: Skolverket.

Forssten Seiser, A., & Karlefjärd, A. (2014). Aktionsforskning som förhållningssätt i en föränderlig omvärld. KAPET, [Action research as an approach in a changing environment] 10, 58–73.

Forssten Seiser, A. (2017). Stärkt pedagogiskt ledarskap. Rektorer granskar sin egen praktik. Doctoral thesis. Karlstad: Karlstads University

Forssten Seiser, A. (2019). Exploring enhanced pedagogical leadership: an action research study involving Swedish principals. Educational Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.165666

Gunter, H., & Ribbins, P. (2003). Challenging orthodoxy in school leadership studies: Knowers, knowing and knowledge? School Leadership and Management, 23(2), 129–147.

Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. London, UK: Polity.

Hirsh, Å., & Lindberg, V. (2015). Delrapport från SKOLFORS-projektet. Formativ bedöming på 2000-talet - en översikt av svensk och internationell forskning. [Interim report from the SKOLFORS project. Formative assessment in the 21 st century – an overview of Swedish and international research]. Stockholm, Sweden: Vetenskapsrådet

Jankowski, N., & Provezis, S. (2012). Neoliberal ideologies, governmentality and the academy: An examination of accountability through assessment and transparency. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(5), 475–487.

Kaukko, M., and Wilkinson, J., (2018). 'Learning how to go on': refugee students and informal learning practices. International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1514080

Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. (2008). Enabling praxis. Challenges for education. . I S. Kemmis & T. J. Smith (Red.), Situating Praxis in Practice. (ss. 37-62). Amsterdam: SENSE Pub.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014a). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research: Singapore: Springer Singapore.

Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., & Grootenboer (2014b). Changing practice, changing education. Singapore: Springer, Singapore

Kvernbekk, T. (2013). Evidence-based practice: On the function of evidence in practical reasoning. Studier i pedagogisk filosofi, 2(2), 19–33.

Levinsson, M. (2013). Evidens och existens. Evidensbaserad undervisning i ljuset av lärares erfarenheter.[Evidence and existence. Evidence-based teaching in the light of teachers’ experiences]. (Doctoral dissertation). Gothenburg, Sweden: The University of Gothenburg.

Mahon, K., Kemmis, S., Fransisco, S., & Lloyd, A. (2017). Introduction: Practice theory and the theory of practice architectures. In K. Mahon, S. Fransisco, & S. Kemmis (Eds.), Exploring education and professional practice: Through the lens of practice architectures (pp. 1–30). Singapore, Singapore: SAGE.

Novak, J. (2019). Juridification of educational spheres: The case of Sweden. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1401464

Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London, UK: SAGE. SFS 2010:800. Skollag [Education Act of 2010.] Retrieved from http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800

Yin, R. K. (2013). Kvalitativ forskning från start till mål. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { real836749, journal = {Research in Educational Administration and Leadership}, issn = {}, eissn = {2564-7261}, address = {}, publisher = {Eğitim Yöneticileri ve Eğitim Denetçileri Derneği}, year = {2021}, volume = {6}, pages = {348 - 376}, doi = {10.30828/real/2021.2.1}, title = {When the demand for educational research meet practice}, key = {cite}, author = {Forssten Seiser, Anette} }
APA Forssten Seiser, A . (2021). When the demand for educational research meet practice . Research in Educational Administration and Leadership , 6 (2) , 348-376 . DOI: 10.30828/real/2021.2.1
MLA Forssten Seiser, A . "When the demand for educational research meet practice" . Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 6 (2021 ): 348-376 <
Chicago Forssten Seiser, A . "When the demand for educational research meet practice". Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 6 (2021 ): 348-376
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - When the demand for educational research meet practice AU - Anette Forssten Seiser Y1 - 2021 PY - 2021 N1 - doi: 10.30828/real/2021.2.1 DO - 10.30828/real/2021.2.1 T2 - Research in Educational Administration and Leadership JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 348 EP - 376 VL - 6 IS - 2 SN - -2564-7261 M3 - doi: 10.30828/real/2021.2.1 UR - Y2 - 2021 ER -
EndNote %0 Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL) When the demand for educational research meet practice %A Anette Forssten Seiser %T When the demand for educational research meet practice %D 2021 %J Research in Educational Administration and Leadership %P -2564-7261 %V 6 %N 2 %R doi: 10.30828/real/2021.2.1 %U 10.30828/real/2021.2.1
ISNAD Forssten Seiser, Anette . "When the demand for educational research meet practice". Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 6 / 2 (Haziran 2021): 348-376 .
AMA Forssten Seiser A . When the demand for educational research meet practice. REAL is a scholarly a peer-reviewed publication. 2021; 6(2): 348-376.
Vancouver Forssten Seiser A . When the demand for educational research meet practice. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership. 2021; 6(2): 348-376.
IEEE A. Forssten Seiser , "When the demand for educational research meet practice", Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, c. 6, sayı. 2, ss. 348-376, Haz. 2021, doi:10.30828/real/2021.2.1