___

• ANDERMAN, S. (2004), “Does the Microsoft Case Offer a New Paradigm for the ‘Exceptional Circumstances’ Test and Compulsory Copyright Licenses under EC Competition Law?”, The Competition Law Review, Vol. 1, 7-22.
• ANDERMAN, S.D. (2007) , The Interface Between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy, Cambridge University Press, UK.
• ANDREANGELLI, A. (2009), “Interoperability as an ‘Essential Facility’ in the Microsoft Case- Encouraging Competition or Stifling Innovation?” European Law Review, 34(4), 584-611.
• APPELDORN, J. (2005), “He Who Spareth His Rod, Hateth His Son? Microsoft, Super-Dominance and Article 82 EC”, ECLR, 26(12), 653-658.
• CARLTON, D.W. (2001), “A General Analysis of Exclusionary Conduct and Refusal to Deal- Why Aspen and Kodak are Misguided?”, NBER Working Paper 8105, http://www.nber.org/papers/w8105.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 21.03.2010.
• DEMİRÖZ, A. (2009) “Sözleşme Yapmayı Reddetme Bağlamında Hakim Durumdaki Teşebbüslere Getirilen Yükümlülüklerin Sınırları”
• Rekabet Hukukunda Güncel Gelişmeler Sempozyumu- VII içinde s. 317-395.
• DREXL, J. (2004), “Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law - IMS Health and Trinko - Antitrust Placebo for Consumers Instead of Sound Economics in Refusal-to-Deal Cases”, IIC, 2004, 7
• EAGLES, I. ve L. LONGDIN (2008), “Microsoft’s Refusal to Disclose Interoperability Information and the Court of First Instance”
• European Intellectual Property Review.
• GERADIN, D. (2008), “Limiting the Scope of Article 82 of the EC Treaty: What can EU Learn from the US Supreme Court’s Judgement in Trinko in the Wake of Microsoft, IMS and Deutsche Telekom?”
• Common Market Law Review, December 2005.
• GERADIN, D. (2010), “Is the Guidance Paper on the Commisision’s Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 102 TEFU to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct Useful?”, s. 5
• http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1569502
• Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2010. GUTERMUTH, A. (2009), “Article 82 Guidance: A Closer Look at the Analytical Framework and the Papaer’s Likely Impact on European Enforcement Practice”, The Online Magazine for Global Competition Policy, February 2009, Release 1, s. 5.
• http://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/article-82-guidance-a-closer
• look-at-the-analytical-framework-and-the-papers-likely-impact-on-european
• enforcement-practice, Erişim Tarihi: 19.03.2010.
• GÜRZUMAR, O. B. (2006), Zorunlu Unsur Doktrinine Dayalı Sözleşme Yapma Yükümlülüğü: Hâkim Durumun Rakiple Anlaşma Yapmaktan Kaçınmak Suretiyle Kötüye Kullanılması, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• HOVENKAMP, H., M.D. JANIS ve M.A. LEMLEY (2005), “Unilateral Refusals to License in the US”, Stanford Law School, John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper No: 303.
• http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=703161
• Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2010 HOVENKAMP, H., M.D. JANIS ve M. A. LEMLEY (2005), IP and Antitrust, An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law, Apsen Publishers, USA.
• HUMPE, C. ve C. RITTER (2005), “Refusal to Deal”, (GCLC Research Papers on Article 82 EC- July 2005 içinde), Temmuz 2005
• http://www.coleurope.eu/content/gclc/documents/GCLC%20Research%20Paper s%20on%20Article%2082%20EC.pdf
• JONES, A. ve B. SUFFRIN (2008), EC Competition Law, Third Edition, Oxford University Press, USA.
• KJØLBYE, L. (2009), “Article 82 EC as a Remedy to Patent System Imperfections: Fighting Fire with Fire?”, World Competition, Volume 32, Issue 2. KORAH, V. (2005), The Interface Between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition in Developed Countries, SCRIPT-ed, Volume 2 Issue 4
• http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/SCRIPT-ed/vol2-4/korah.pdf
• Erişim Tarihi: 16.03.2010. LEVEQUE, F. (2005), “Innovation, Leveraging and Essential Facilities: Interoperability Licensing in the EU Microsoft Case”, World Competition, Vol. 28, 71-91.
• MONTI, G. (2010), “Article 82 EC: What Future for the Effect-Based Approach?”, Journal of Competition Law and Practice, No: 1(1)
• MULLER, U. (2008), “The Rise and Fall of Essential Facility Doctrine”, European Competition Law Review, 29(5), 310-329.
• NAGY, C.I. (2007), “Refusal to Deal and the Doctrine of Essential Facilities in US and EC Competition Law: A Comparative Perspective and a Proposal for a Workable Analytical Framework”, European Law Review, 32(5), 664-685.
• O’DONOGHUE, R. ve A. J. PADILLA (2006), The Law and Economics of Article 82 EC, First Edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, UK.
• PETIT, N. (2009), From Formalism to Effects: The Commision’s Guidance on Article 82 EC, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1476082, Erişim Tarihi: 23.03.2010. RITTER, C. (2005), “Refusal to Deal and ‘Essential Facilities’: Does Intellectual Property Require Special Deference Compared to Tangible Property?”, World Competition 28(3).
• SCHMIDT, C. ve W. KERBER (2008), “Microsoft, Refusal to License Intellectual property Rights, and the Incentives Balance Test of the EU Commission”, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1297939
• Erişim Tarihi: 10.04.2010. SCHWEITZER, H. (2007), “Controlling the Unilateral Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights: A Multitude of Approaches but No Way Ahead? The Transatlantic Search for a New Approach”, EUI Working Papers, 2007/31. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1093243
• Erişim Tarihi: 26.02.2010. SHAPIRO, C. (2001), “Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licences, Patent Pools and Standart Setting”, A. B. JAFFE (der.) Innovation Policy and Economy I içinde. http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/thicket.pdf
• Erişim Tarihi: 14.03.2010. SHELANSKI, H.A. (2009), “Unilateral Refusals To Deal in Intellectual and Other Property”, Antitrust Law Journal 2009, Volume 76, Issue:2, 369-395.
• SUBIOTTO, R. ve R. O’DONOGHUE (2003), “Defining the Scope of the Dominant Firms to Deal with Existing Customers Under Article 82 EC”, European Competition Law Review, 24(12), 683-694.
• TREACY, P. (1998), “Essential Facilities- Is the Tide Turning?”, European Competition Law Review, 8, 501-505.
• VESTERDORF, B. (2010), “Article 82 EC: Where Do We Stand After the Microsoft Judgement.”, http://www.icc.qmul.ac.uk/GAR/Vesterdorf.pdf
• Erişim Tarihi: 13.04.2010. WHISH, R. (2009), Competition Law, Sixth Edition, Oxford University Press, USA.