REMITTANCES AND EMPLOYMENT YOUTH IN KYRGYZSTAN

Since the independence Kyrgyzstan have experienced social and economic issues, such as poverty and unemployment. This caused mass migration of labor force and now Kyrgyzstan receives about remittances that account for 30% of GDP. This paper aims to analyse remittances impact on employment, in particularly of youth population. Results of multinomial logit model estimations show that migrants’ remittances increases probability of choice being unemployed and home worker among youth population.

REMITTANCES AND EMPLOYMENT YOUTH IN KYRGYZSTAN

Since the independence Kyrgyzstan have experienced social and economic issues, such as poverty and unemployment. This caused mass migration of labor force and now Kyrgyzstan receives about remittances that account for 30% of GDP. This paper aims to analyse remittances impact on employment, in particularly of youth population. Results of multinomial logit model estimations show that migrants’ remittances increases probability of choice being unemployed and home worker among youth population.

___

  • Adams, R. (2004): “Remittances and Poverty in Guatemala”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3418.
  • Funkhouser, E. (1992): “Migration from Nicaragua: Some Recent Evidence,” World Development, 20(8), p.1209-18.
  • Killingsworth, Mark R. (1983): “Labour Supply,” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lokshin, M. and E. Glinskaya (2008): “The effect of male migration for work on employment patterns of females in Nepal,” The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 4757.
  • Lucas, R. (1987): "Emigration to South Africa.s Mines," American Economic Review, 89, 1337 - 57.
  • Piracha, M., Randazzo, T. and F. Vadean (2013): “Remittances and Occupational Outcomes of the Household Members Left-Behind,” IZA DP No. 7582.
  • Zhu, N. and X. Luo (2008): “The impact of remittances on rural poverty and inequality in China,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4637.
  • Эконометрика [Текст]: учеб. / Под ред. И.И. Елисеевой. – М.: Проспект, 2010. – С. 106-125.