CRISIS PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND THE EFFECT OF NATIONAL CULTURE UNDER CRISIS: A STUDY FROM TURKEY

Crisis management is a critical function in organizations, specifically developing and emerging countries dealing with crisis in a minor and major scale frequently. Crisis in projects should be handled immediately and professionally in where the projects threat the reputation of a company. In traditional organizations, most common organizational behavior under crisis seems to take the risk with no supported mechanism. Project management based organizations practice risk management under project management methodologies, surprisingly we cannot find many companies are prepared for crisis. This behavior may associate with national culture, especially Hofstede’s extensive work on national cultures. Therefore, this paper investigates cultural characteristics of Turkish business culture under crisis, and identifies the relationship with the natural culture dimensions and crisis project management. Two-stages survey questionnaires are employed and data analyzed using different statistical analysis. Our results indicate that power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term orientations are the national cultural dimensions observed significantly under crisis situations. Further investigation and recommendations are discussed

___

  • Asunakutlu, T., Safran B. 2003, “Kriz Yönetimi Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 5, Sayı 1.
  • Bing, J.W. 2014, “Hofstede's Consequences: The Impact of His Work on Consulting and Business Practices”, Academy of Management Stable.
  • Chipulu, M., Ojiako, U., Gardiner, P., Williams, T., Mota, C., Maguire, S., Shou, Y., Stamati, T., Marshall, A. 2014, “Exploring the impact of cultural values on project performance”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 34 Iss 3 pp. 364 - 389
  • Dinçer, Ö. 2003, “Stratejik Yönetim ve İşletme Politikası”, Beta Basımevi, Istanbul.
  • Hillson, D. 2000, “Project Risks. Identifying Causes, Risks, and Effects”, PM Network 14. PMI. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 49.
  • Hofstede, G. 1983, “National Cultures Revisited”, Behavior Science Research, 18, 4, 1983, pp 285-305.
  • Hofstede Centre [online] http://geert-hofstede.com/the-hofstede-centre.html (Accessed 30 January 2015)
  • Kaptan, A.K. 2014, “Evaluating the project management and crisis management concepts in Turkish business culture”, Proceedings Book of
  • UKPYK 2014: First Project Management Conference with International Participation, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Kalpaklıoğlu, Ü.N. 2010, “Krizlere en hassas sektör turizmde etkin kriz yönetimi”, Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, (44), pp.139
  • Kerzner, H. 1979, “Project Management – A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling”, 11th Edt , Wiley.
  • Keown-McMullan, C. 1997, “Crisis: when does a molehill become a mountain?”, Disaster Prevention and Management: An International
  • Journal, Vol. 6 Iss: 1, 4 – 10. Liu, J., Meng, F., Fellows, R. 2015, “An exploratory study of understanding project risk management from the perspective of national culture”, International Journal of Project Management, Volume 33, Issue 3, April 2015, Pages 564–575
  • Merkin, R.S. 2006, “Uncertainty avoidance and facework: A test of the Hofstede model”, Department of Communication and Culture, New
  • York University, 239 Greene Street, New York, New York 10003, USA
  • Ofluoglu, G., Misirli, K. 2001, “İşletme ve Kriz Yönetimi”, Kamu-İş; Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2/2001
  • Soysal, A., Paksoy, H.M., Özçalıcı, M. 2011, “Kriz Yönetiminde Liderlik Yeteneğinin Bazı Demografik Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi”,
  • Çanakkale 18 Mart Üniversitesi Girişimcilik Dergisi, 2011 Mayıs, pp. 222-248
  • Tang, L. , Koveos, P. 2008, “A Framework to Update Hofstede's Cultural Value Indices: Economic Dynamics and Institutional Stability”,
  • Journal of International Business Studies 39, 1045-1063 (September 2008)