___

• Addey, C., Sellar, C. (2018). “Why Do Countries Participate in PISA? Understanding the Role of International Large-Scale Assessments in Global Education Policy.” Global Education Policy and International Development: New Agendas, Issues and Policies, 97-117.
• Andrews, P., Atkinson, L., Ball, S. J., Barber, M., Beckett, L., Berardi, J., ... & Boudet, D, et al. (2014, May 6). “OECD and PISA Tests are Damaging Education Worldwide-Academics.” The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/may/06/oecd-pisa-tests-damaging-education-academics
• Aydın, A., Selvitopu, A., & Kaya, M. (2018). Eğitime yapılan yatırımlar ve PISA 2015 sonuçları karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme. Elementary Education Online, 17(3).
• Aypay, A. (2015). Eğitim Politikası. Pegem Akademi: Ankara
• Baird, J.-A., Isaacs, T., Johnson, S., Stobart, G., Yu, G., Sprague, T., et al. (2011). Policy effects of PISA. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment.
• Baker, D. P., and G. Lenhardt. (2008). “The Institutional Crisis of the German Research University.” Higher Education Review, 21:49–64.
• Baker, D. P., and G. K. LeTendre. (2005). National Differences, Global Similarities: World Culture and the Future of Schooling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Bakioğlu, A., & Korumaz, M. (2019). Eğitim Politikaları Kuramlar, Yöntemler, Göstergeler, Etkiler ve Uygulamalar. Nobel: Ankara
• Białecki, I., Jakubowski, M., & Wiśniewski, J. (2017). Education policy in Poland: The impact of PISA (and other international studies). European Journal of Education, 52(2), 167-174. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12216
• Bonnet, G. (2002). Reflections in a critical eye: On the pitfalls of international assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 9(3), 387-399
• Bracey, G.W. (2004). International comparisons: Less than meets the eye? Phi Delta Kappan 85 (6): 477–8.
• Breakspear, S. (2014). How Does PISA Shape Education Policy Making? Why How We Measure Learning Determines What Counts in Education, Centre for Strategic Education Seminar Series Paper (Vol. 40). Melbourne
• https://simonbreakspear.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Breakspear-PISA-Paper.pdf
• Chung, J. (2010). Finland, PISA, and the Implications of International Achievement Studies on Education Policy. In The Impact of International Achievement Studies on Education Policy, edited by A. W. Wisemann, 267–294. Bingley: Emerald Group. doi:10.1108/S1479-3679(2010) 0000013016
• Crossley, M. (2014). Global league tables, big data and the international transfer of educational research modalities. Comparative Education, 50(1), 15–26. DOI:10.1080/03050068.2013.871438
• Çelik, K., & Yurdakul, A. (2020). Investigation of PISA 2015 Reading Ability Achievement of Turkish Students in Terms of Student and School Level Variables. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(1), 30-42. Darling-Hammond, L. 2011. Foreword.” In Surpassing Shanghai: An Agenda for American Education Built on the World‘s Leading Systems, edited by M. Tucker, ix–xii. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Education Press
• Davis, E. R., Wilson, R., & Dalton, B. (2020). Another slice of PISA: An interrogation of educational cross-national attraction in Australia, Finland, Japan and South Korea. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(3), 309-331. DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2018.1510305
• Dohn, N.B. (2007). Knowledge and skills for PISA. Assessing the assessment. Journal of Philosophy of Education 41(1) ,2–16.
• Dolin, J., & Krogh, L. B. (2010). The relevance and consequences of PISA science in a Danish context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 565-592.
• Feniger, Y., Livneh, I. & Yogev, A. (2012). Globalisation and the politics of international tests: the case of Israel. Comparative Education, 48(3), 323-335.
• Feniger, Y., & Lefstein, A. (2014). How not to reason with PISA data: An ironic investigation. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 845-855.
• Figazzolo, L. 2009. Impact of PISA 2006 on the education policy debate. Presentation at the Education International Research Network Fifth Annual Meeting, 10–11 March 2009, Brussels, Belgium. http://www.ei-ie.org/research/en/documentation.php
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. DOI:10. 1080/02680930802412669
• Güner, H., Çelebi, N., Kaya, G. T., & Korumaz, M. (2014). Neoliberal eğitim politikaları ve eğitimde fırsat eşitliği bağlamında uluslararası sınavların (PISA, TIMSS ve PIRLS) analizi. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 3(3), 33-75.
• Gür, B. S., Celik, Z., & Özoğlu, M. (2012). Policy options for Turkey: A critique of the interpretation and utilization of PISA results in Turkey. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 1-21.
• Hogan, A. (2016). “NAPLAN and the Role of Edu-Business: New Governance, New Privatisations and New Partnerships in Australian Education Policy.” The Australian Educational Researcher 43 (1): 93–110. DOI:10.1007/s13384-014-0162-z
• Huang, H., & Kan, Y. (2020). The impact of the OECD on education worldwide, Asia Pacific Journal of Education. DOI: 10.1080/02188791.2020.1712057
• Kamens, D. H., & McNeely, C. L. (2010). Globalization and the growth of international educational testing and national assessment. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 5-25.
• Knighton, T., Brochu, P. and Gluszynski, T. (2010) Measuring up: Canadian results of the OECD PISA study. Human Resources and Skill Development Canada, Council of Ministers of Education, Canada, and Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-590-x/81-590-x2004001-eng.pdf [Erişim Tarihi: 07.04.2020].
• Knodel, P., Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2013). PISA as an ideational roadmap for policy change: exploring Germany and England in a comparative perspective. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 11(3), 421–441. DOI:10.1080/14767724.2012.761811
• Lau, K. C. (2009). A critical examination of PISA’s assessment on scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 7(2), 1061–88
• Lewis, S. (2017). Policy, Philanthropy and Profit: The OECD’s PISA for Schools and New Modes of Heterarchical Educational Governance. Comparative Education 53 (4), 518–537.
• Lingard, B. (2013). The Impact of Research on Education Policy in an Era of EvidenceBased Policy. Critical Studies in Education 54 (2): 113–131
• Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2013). When Do Numbers Count? the Differential Impact of the PISA Rating and Ranking on Education Policy in Germany and the US. German Politics 22 (3): 314–332. DOI:10.1080/09644008.2013.794455
• Meyer, H. D., & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books Ltd. MEB. (2015). TIMSS Tanıtım Kitapçığı Erişim Tarihi: 09.04.2020http://timss.meb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/Tanitim_Kitapcigi.pdf
• Mons, N., & Pons, X. (2013). Why no “PISA shock” occurred in France? Sociology of the reception of an international survey (2001-2008). Revue Française De Pédagogie, (1), 9-18.
• Morrow, R.A. & Torres, C. A. (2000). The State, Globalization, and Educational Policy. In N.C. Burbules and C.A. Torres (Ed.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives. New York and London: Routledge.
• Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Kennedy, A. M., Trong, K. L., & Sainsbury, M. P. (2015). TIMSS 2017 Assessment frameworks. TIMMS and Pirls International Study Center, Boston College.
• Mullis, I. V., & Martin, M. O. (2017). TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.
• Odendahl, W. (2017). " Bildungskrise"--PISA and the German Educational Crisis. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(1), 209-226.
• OECD. (2007a). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world: Volume 1 analysis. Paris: OECD.
• Rappleye, J., Komatsu, H., Uchida, Y., Krys, K., & Markus, H. (2020). ‘Better policies for better lives’?: constructive critique of the OECD’s (mis) measure of student well-being. Journal of Education Policy, 35(2), 258-282.
• Ringarp, J. (2016). PISA lends legitimacy: A study of education policy changes in Germany and Sweden after 2000. European Educational Research Journal, 15(4), 447-461. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2006). Globalization and the changing nature of the OECD’s educational work. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J.-A. Dillabough, & A. Halsey (Eds.), Education, globalization and social change (pp. 247–260). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Rochex, J-Y. (2006). Social, Methodological, and Theoretical Issues Regarding Assessment: Lessons From A Secondary Analysis of PISA 2000 Literacy Test. Review of Research in Education 30: 163–212.
• Schleicher, A. (2018). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. Retrieved from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464-485.
• Sjøberg, S. (2007). PISA and «Real Life Challenges»: Mission Impossible? In Hopman, Brinek & Rezl (Eds (2007). Wien: LIT Verlag 2007. ISBN 978-3-8258-0946-1. p. 203-224
• Smith, G. (2013). Dispelling Three Decades of ‘Educational Reform’. Monthly Review, 65(4), 58.
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2006). The Economics of Policy Borrowing and Lending: A Study of Late Adopters. Comparative Education 32 (5): 665–678. DOI:10.1080/03054980600976353.
• Stray, J. H., & Wood, B. (2020). Global-local education policy dynamics: A case study of New Zealand and Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(2), 256-269.
• Takayama, K., F. Waldow, and Y.-K. Sung. (2013). Finland Has It All? Examining the Media Accentuation of ‘Finnish Education’ in Australia, Germany and South Korea. Research in Comparative and International Education 8 (3): 307–325. DOI:10.2304/rcie.2013.8.3.307.
• Takayama, K. (2009). The Politics of International League Tables: PISA in Japan’s Achievement Crisis Debate. Comparative Education 4(4), 387–407.
• Taylor, S., & Henry, M. (2007). Globalization and educational policymaking: a case study. In The RoutledgeFalmer reader in education policy and politics (pp. 111-126). Routledge.
• Wallace, M. (1993). Discourse of Derision: The Role of the Mass Media within the Education Policy Process. Journal of Education Policy 8 (4): 321–337. DOI:10.1080/0268093930080402.
• Wieczorek, O., Münch, R., Brand, A., & Schwanhäuser, S. (2020). Governing the School by Transnational Networks. The OECD PISA Policy Advisor Network in the Global Field of Power. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/ahpfw
• Yemini, M., & N. Gordon. (2017). Media Representations of National and International Standardised Testing in the Israeli Education System. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38 (2): 262–276. DOI:10.1080/01596306.2015.1105786.