___

• Aydın, Mustafa, New Geopolitics of Central Asia and the Caucasus: Causes of Instability and Predicament, SAM Papers No. 2/2000.
• Forsythe, Rosemarie, ‘The Politics of Oil in the Caucasus and Central Asia’, Adelphi Paper 300, IISS, 1996.
• Joseph, Jofi, ‘Pipeline Diplomacy: the Clinton Administration’s Fight for Baku-Ceyhan’, WWS Case Study, January 1999.
• Pala, Christopher, ‘US Urges Kazakhstan to Bypass Russia’s pipes’, Moscow Times, 14 June 2001, p. 5.
• Pamir, Necdet, Bakü-Ceyhan Boruhattı: Orta Asya ve Kafkasya’da Bitmeyen Oyun (The Baku-Ceyhan Pipeline: the Endless Game in Central Asia and the Caucasus), ASAM, 1999.
• ____________, Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Enerji Güvenliği (Energy Security in the World and in Turkey), ASAM Papers, 19 March 2001.
• Ruseckas, Laurent, ‘Turkey and Eurasia: Opportunities and Risks in the Caspian Pipeline Derby’, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 54, No. 1, Fall 2000.
• Sesley, Brent, ‘Turkey’s Energy Policy in the Post-Cold War Era’, Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 2, No. 4, December 1998.
• Winrow, Gareth, Turkey and the Caucasus: Domestic Interests and Security Concerns, Central Asian and Caucasian Prospects, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2000. OTHER SOURCES
• Alirıza, Bülent, ‘After the OSCE Summit: Caucasian Strife and Caspian Oil’, CSIS-Caspian Energy Update, 24 November 1999. See; http://www.csis.org/turkey/CEU991124.html.
• ____________, ‘The Clear and Present Danger in the Turkish Straits’, CSIS-Caspian Energy Update, February 2000. See; http://www.csis.org/turkey/CEU000115.html.
• ____________, ‘The Eurasian Energy Corridor: Turning into a Cul-de-sac?’, CSIS-Caspian Energy Update, 25 February 2000. See; http://www.csis.org/turkey/CEU000116.html.
• _____________, ‘US Caspian Pipeline Policy: Substance or Spin?’, CSIS-Caspian Energy Update, August 2000. See; http://www.csis.org/turkeyCEU000117.html.
• ‘Blow to Baku-Ceyhan’, NTV-MSNBC, 24 March 2001.
• ‘Chevron Confirms Interest in Financing Study for Baku-Ceyhan Pipeline’, Oil and Gas Journal Exchange, 18 April 2001. See; http://auction.ogjpropertyexchange.com/p…/displayNews.jsp?NEWS_ID=1265.
• Caspian Sea Region, Energy Information Administration, June 2000. See; http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/caspian.html.
• ‘Export Route Progress’, Petroleum Economist, Vol. 68, No. 5, May 2001, pp. 39-40.
• Frantz, Douglas, ‘Chevron Talks to Azerbaijanis about the Pipeline’, New York Times, 10 February , p. 5. Ignatius, David, ‘Dick Cheney and the ‘Great Game’’, Washington Post, 27 August 2000, p. B07.
• Lelyveld, Michael, ‘Azerbaijan: Plans for Baku-Ceyhan Pipeline Moving Ahead Despite Iranian Alternative’, RFE/RL, Boston, 28 July 2000.
• Recent Developments in the Caspian Sea, CSIS-Energy and National Security Program. See; http://www.csis.org/energy/Caspiandevs.html. Transcript: Briefing with John Wolf, Special Advisor on Caspian Energy, 25 August 2000, Press
• Conference in Ankara, Washington File-Press and Culture Section, US Embassy, Romania. See; http://www.usembassy.ro/USIS/Washington-File/500/00-08-25/eur503.htm. Yıldızcan, Güzin, ‘Baku-Ceyhan Project Linked to US Presidential Election’, Turkish Daily News, August 2000. See; http://www.uzbekistanerk.org/7engl100800.html.
• US Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 2000. See Table 1.
• US Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 2000.
• Caspian Sea Region, Energy Information Administration, June 2000. See; http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/caspian.html.
• Mustafa Aydın, New Geopolitics of Central Asia and the Caucasus: Causes of Instability ad Predicament, SAM Papers No: 2/2000, p. 61. Ibid., p. 7.
• Gareth Winrow, Turkey and the Caucasus: Domestic Interests and Security Concerns, Central Asian and Caucasian Prospects, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2000, pp. 46-47.
• Rosemarie Forsythe, ‘The Politics of Oil in the Caucasus and Central Asia’, Adelphi Paper 300, IISS, 1996, pp. 13-14.
• ‘Export Route Progress’, Petroleum Economist, Vol. 68, No. 5, May 2001, p. 40. R. Forsythe, op. cit., pp. 17-20.
• Christopher Pala, ‘US Urges Kazakhstan to Bypass Russia’s Pipes”, Moscow Times, 14 June , p. 5. R. Forsythe, op. cit., p. 23. Ibid., pp. 23-25. Ibid., pp. 26-27. Necdet Pamir, Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Enerji Güvenliği (Energy Security in the World and in Turkey), ASAM Papers, 19 March 2001, p. 1.
• The Ankara Agreement was signed by Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkey and Uzbekistan with Turkmenistan in abstention. Turkmenistan signed a bilateral agreement with Turkey afterwards. Charles Coe, ‘Baku-Ceyhan Pipeline Project Moves Forward as SOCAR, BP-Amoco Reach Agreement’, Alexander’s Gas and Oil Connections, Company News: Central Asia, Vol. 5, No. 20, 1 November 2000. See; http:www.gasandoil.com/goc/company/cnc04439.htm.
• ‘Chevron Confirms Interest in Financing Study for Baku-Ceyhan Pipeline’, Oil and Gas Journal Exchange, 18 April 2001. See; http://auction.ogjpropertyexchange.com/p…/displayNews.jsp?NEWS_ID=1265. N. Pamir, 2001, op. cit., p. 5.
• Such as the support given by Chevron: ‘Chevron Confirms Interest in Financing Study for Baku-Ceyhan Pipeline’, Oil and Gas Journal Exchange, 18 April 2001.
• See; http://auction.ogjpropertyexchange.com/p…/displayNews.jsp?NEWS_ID=1265.
• Experts confirm that the underlying reason behind such support relates to the corporate interests of Chevron for a gas deal with Turkey, which has a considerable domestic demand for gas. In terms of its domestic energy needs, Turkey needs to import gas 45bn cm in 2005, 55bn cm in and 82bn cm in 2020.
• Exploration-development-transportation-distribution-marketing. N. Pamir, 2001, op. cit., p. 5.