Nursel YALÇIN, Berker KILIÇ, Çiğdem ATATAY

7168

A Model Suggestion For STEM Activity Design Within The Scope Of The Curriculum

STEM which can be used for educating students at every stages, has product and practice based activities at its basis and integrates different disciplines is a new educational approach used as an acronym for the words Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics. Education must focus on the humanly fields such as creativity, critical thinking, collaborating and problem solving that can not be solved via machines or information technologies. But it is not quite possible to have the individuals acquire these abilities by using classical educational understanding.  Therefore, it is crucially important developing well-structured STEM activities and the individual’s making mistakes by getting into incorrect directions during the education process, achieving the solutions by using trial-error method and via his/her own cognitive and operational processes.  In the STEM field, attempts by partially public and by partially private sector are encountered in our country. But unfortunately, it can not be possible to correspond the STEM activities that are prepared for considering the curriculum of different countries with the curriculum applied in our country exactly. Putting forward the processes that are structured considering the curriculum and inside the process the students’ using their humanly abilities in developing STEM activities are such as to form the basis of the studies that are made in the field of STEM in our country. In this study, it is tried to design a well-structured STEM activity by examining the curriculum of Maths, Science Technologies, Information Technologies and Software courses and a sample STEM activity designing process has been developed.
Keywords:

STEM, curriculum, activity,

PDF

___

  • Akgündüz, D., Ertepınar H., Ger M. A., Kaplan Sayı A., & Türk Z. (2015). STEM Eğitimi Çalıştay Raporu Türkiye STEM Eğitimi Üzerine Kapsamlı Bir Değerlendirme. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi STEM Merkezi ve Eğitim Fakültesi.
  • Akgündüz, D. (2016). A Research about the Placement of the Top Thousand Students in STEM Fields in Turkey between 2000 and 2014. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1365-1377
  • Beane, J.A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 616-622.
  • Borko, H., Flory M. & Cumbo K. (1993). Teachers' ideas and practices about assessment and instruction: a case study of the effects of alternative assessment in instruction, student learning, and accountability practice. CSE Technical Report 366, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
  • Childress, V.W. (1996). Does integrating technology, science, and mathematics improve technological problem solving? A quasi-experiment.
  • Colburn, A. & Clough, M.P. (1997). Implementing the learning cycle. The Science Teacher 64(5): 30–33.
  • Çorlu, M.S., Capraro, R.M., & Capraro, M.M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39 (171), 74-85.
  • CurrTech Integrations, (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics curriculum integration program (STEM-CIP)
  • Doran, R., Chan, F. & Tamir, P. (1998). Science educator’s guide to assessment. National Science Teachers Association
  • Engineering. (n.d.). Dictionary.com, Date of access: 20 August 2016, http://www.dictionary.com/browse/engineering
  • Falk, B. & Darling-Hammond, L. (1993). The primary language record at P.S. 261: how assessment transforms teaching and learning. National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching
  • Science. (n.d.). Dictionary.com, Date of access: 20 August 2016, http://www.dictionary.com/browse/science
  • Goh, H. & Bilal Ali, M.b. (2014). Robotics as a Tool to STEM Learning. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 2(10), 66-78.
  • Hacıömeroğlu, G. & Bulut, A.S., 2016. Integrative STEM Teaching Intention Questionnaire: A Validity and Relaibility Study of the Turkish Form. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 12(3), 654-669.
  • Jacobs, H.H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. ERIC.
  • Koretz, D., Stecher, B., Klein, S., McCaffrey, D. & Diebert, E. (1993). Can portfolios assess student performance and influence instruction? CSE Technical Report 371. Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
  • Lynch, S.J., Behrend, T., Burton, E. P. & Means, B. (2013). Inclusive STEM-focused high schools: STEM education policy and opportunity structures. National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST).
  • MacLead, K.A. & Kraglund-Gauthier, W. (2015). A Case Study of Infusing Technology into Pre-service Secondary Science Teacher Learning: Conceptions and Attitudes While Navigating Changing Digital Landscapes. Journal of Eurapean Education, 5(2), 2146-2674.
  • Mathematics. (n.d.). Dictionary.com, Date of access: 20 August 2016, http://www.dictionary.com/browse/mathematics
  • Mathison, S. & Freeman, M. (1997). The logic of interdisciplinary studies. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
  • Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, (2012). Ortaokul ve İmam Hatip Ortaokulu Bilişim Teknolojileri ve Yazılım Dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı
  • Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, (2013). İlköğretim Kurumları (İlkokullar ve Ortaokullar) Fen Bilimleri Dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı
  • Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, (2013). Ortaokul Matematik Dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı
  • Morrison, J. (2013). TIES STEM education monograph series, attributes of STEM education. 19,
  • National Research Council, (2011). Successful STEM Education, A Workshop Summary, The National Academies Press.
  • Obama B. (2009). Educate to innovate press conference. Date of access: 10 August 2016, https://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/education/k-12/educate-innovate
  • OECD, (2015). Programme for international student assessment. Date of access: 15 August 2016 http://www.oecd.org/pisa/
  • ÖSYM, (2015). 2015-ÖSYS Yükseköğretim programları ve kontenjanları kılavuzu. Date of access: 15 August 2016 http://www.osym.gov.tr/belge/1-22203/kilavuzlar.html
  • Olszewski-Kubilus, P. (2010). Special schools and other options for gifted STEM students. Roeper Review, 32(1), 61-70.
  • Quang, L.X., Hoang, L.H., Chuan, V.D., Nam, N.H. Anh, N.T.T. & Nhung, V.T.H. (2015). Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education through Active Experience of Designing Technical Toys in Vietnamese Schools. British Journal of Education, Society&Behaviour Science, 11(2), 1-12.
  • Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H. H., & Park, M. S. (2012). Is adding the Enough?: investigating the Impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM Integration. School of Engineering Education Faculty Publications.
  • Rogers-Chapman, M.F. (2013). Accessing STEM-focused education: Factors that contribute to the opportunity to attend STEM high schools across the United States. Education and Urban Society, 20(10), 1-22.
  • Smith, M.L., Noble, A.J., Cabay, M., Heinecke, W., Junker, M.S. & Saffron, Y. (1994). What happens when the test mandate changes? Results of a multiple case study. CSE Technical Report 380.
  • Stone III, J. R. (2011). Delivering STEM education through career and technical education schools and programs. Paper prepared for the National Academies Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment for “Highly Successful STEM Schools or Programs for K-12 STEM Education: A Workshop”
  • Subotnik, R. F., Tai, H. R., Rickoff, R., & Almarode, J. (2010). Specialized public high schools of science, mathematics, and technology and the STEM pipeline: What do we know now and what will we know in 5 years? Roeper Review, 32(1), 7-16.
  • Subotnik, R. F., Tai, H. R., & Almarode, J. (2011). Study of the impact of selective SMT high schools: Reflections on learners gifted and motivated in science and mathematics. Paper prepared for the National Academies Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment for “Highly Successful STEM Schools or Programs for K-12 STEM Education: A Workshop”
  • Technology. (n.d.). Dictionary.com, Date of access: 20 August 2016, http://www.dictionary.com/browse/technology
  • Thomas, J., & Williams, C. (2010). The history of specialized STEM schools and the formation and role of the NCSSSMST. Roeper Review, 32(1), 17-24.
  • Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Participatory Educational Research-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-6123
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Özgen KORKMAZ
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Büşra BUYRUK, Özgen KORKMAZ

Gürbüz OCAK, İjlal OCAK, Nil AKYOL

Selahattin ARSLAN, Neslihan SÖNMEZ

Aslı YERLİKAYA, Mahir YERLİKAYA

Adem YILMAZ, Zeynep FAKİRULLAHOĞLU

Gürbüz OCAK, İjlal OCAK, Serkan BOYRAZ

Şenol ŞEN, Senar TEMEL

Arzu SÖNMEZ

Selcah Süheyla ERGÜN

Tohit GÜNEŞ, Fatma TAŞTAN AKDAĞ