___

• Acar, S. ve Aşıcı, A. A. (2017). Nature and economic growth in Turkey: what does ecological footprint imply?. Middle East Development Journal, 9(1), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/17938120.2017.1288475 Altay Topcu, B. (2021). The impact of export, import, and renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, 8(1), p.31-38. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1376
• Apaydin, Ş. (2020). Küreselleşmenin ekolojik ayakizi üzerindeki etkileri: Türkiye örneği. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.695836
• Beşe, E. ve Friday, H. S. (2022). The relationship between external debt and emissions and ecological footprint through economic growth: Turkey. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2063525. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2063525
• Bilgili, F., Ulucak, R., Koçak, E. ve İlkay, S. Ç. (2020). Does globalization matter for environmental sustainability? Empirical investigation for Turkey by Markov regime switching models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(1), 1087-1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06996-w
• Brown, R.L., Durbin, J., Evans ve J.M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relations over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 37, 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1975.tb01532.x
• Bulut, U. (2021) Environmental sustainability in Turkey: An environmental Kuznets curve estimation for ecological footprint. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(3), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1793425
• Chen, H., Chen, R., Bernard, S. ve Rahman, I. (2019). US hotel industry revenue: An ARDL bounds testing approach. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1720-1743. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2018-0031
• Demir, C., Cergibozan, R. ve Gök, A. (2019). Income inequality and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Energy & Environment, 30(3), 444-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0958305X18793109
• Destek, M. A. (2019). Türkiye’de gelir dağılımının çevre kirliliği üzerindeki etkileri üzerine bir inceleme. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(4), 1477-1488. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.556006
• Destek, M. A. (2021). Deindustrialization, reindustrialization and environmental degradation: Evidence from ecological footprint of Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 296, 126612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126612
• Destek, M. A. ve Sinha, A. (2020). Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organization for economic co-operation and development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537
• Dumrul, Y. ve Kılıçarslan, Z. (2020). Türkiye’nin uluslararası ticareti ve ekolojik ayak izi. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(3), 1589-1597. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.558346
• Ekeocha, D. O. (2021). Urbanization, inequality, economic development and ecological footprint: Searching for turning points and regional homogeneity in Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125244
• Ersungur, Ş. M., Tığtepe, E. ve Kılıç, F. (2022). Ekonomik karmaşıklık ve ekolojik ayak izi ilişkisi: Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik analizi. İşletme Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.33416/baybem.1118496
• FAO. (2016). Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, forestry and other land use. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6340e.pdf
• Galli, A., Wackernagel, M., Iha, K. ve Lazarus, E. (2014). Ecological footprint: Implications for biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 173, 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.019
• Godil, D. I., Sharif, A., Rafique, S. ve Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The asymmetric effect of tourism, financial development, and globalization on ecological footprint in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(32), 40109-40120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09937-0
• GFN. (2012). Executive Summary: Turkey’s Ecological Footprint Report. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/content/images/uploads/Turkey_Ecological_Footprint_Report_Executive_Summary-Conclusion.pdf
• GFN. (2016). Living Planet Report 2016 Technical Supplement: Ecological Footprint. https://wwfint.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/technical_supplement_ecological_footprint_2016.pdf
• Gokmenoglu, K. K., Taspinar, N. ve Rahman, M. M. (2021). Military expenditure, financial development and environmental degradation in Turkey: A comparison of CO2 emissions and ecological footprint. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(1), 986-997. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1831
• Güzel, İ. ve Oluç, İ. (2022). İhracat ürün çeşitlendirmesinin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkisi. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 14(26), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1060437
• Gülmez, A., Altıntaş, N. ve Kahraman, Ü. O. (2020). A puzzle over ecological footprint, energy consumption and economic growth: The case of Turkey. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 27(4), 753-768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00465-1
• Karasoy, A. (2021). Küreselleşme, sanayileşme ve şehirleşmenin Türkiye’nin ekolojik ayak izine etkisinin genişletilmiş ARDL yöntemiyle incelenmesi. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1), 208-231. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsbd.929092
• Kirikkaleli, D., Adebayo, T. S., Khan, Z. ve Ali, S. (2021). Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(11), 14009-14017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11654-7
• Köksal, C., Işik, M. ve Katircioğlu, S. (2020). The role of shadow economies in ecological footprint quality: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(12), 13457-13466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07956-5
• Langnel, Z., Amegavi, G. B., Donkor, P. ve Mensah, J. K. (2021). Income inequality, human capital, natural resource abundance, and ecological footprint in ECOWAS member countries. Resources Policy, 74, 102255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102255
• Mahesh, M. (2016). The effects of trade openness on income inequality-evidence from BRIC countries. Economics Bulletin, 36(3), 1751-1761.
• Narayan, P. K. ve Smyth, R. (2006). What determines migration flows from low‐income to high‐income countries? An empirical investigation of Fiji–Us migration 1972–2001. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(2), 332-342. https://doi.org/10.1093/cep/byj019
• Nathaniel, S., Anyanwu, O. ve Shah, M. (2020). Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(13), 14601-14613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08017-7
• Niccolucci, V., Galli, A., Reed, A., Neri, E., Wackernagel, M. ve Bastianoni, S. (2011). Towards a 3D national ecological footprint geography. Ecological Modelling, 222(16), 2939-2944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.04.020
• Öcal, O., Altinöz, B. VE Aslan, A. (2020). The effects of economic growth and energy consumption on ecological footprint and carbon emissions: Evidence from Turkey. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 667-681. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.773461
• Ozturk, S., Cetin, M. ve Demir, H. (2021). Income inequality and CO2 emissions: nonlinear evidence from Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 11911–11928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01922-y
• Özsoy, F. N. (2021). Türkiye’de yolsuzluk ve ekolojik ayak izi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.762565
• Pata, U. K. (2021). Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective. Renewable Energy, 173, 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.125
• Pellegrini, G., Ingrao, C., Camposeo, S., Tricase, C., Conto, F. ve Huisingh, D. (2016). Application of water footprint to olive growing systems in the Apulia region: a comparative assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2407-2418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.088
• Pesaran, M.H. ve Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Strom, S. (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Chapter 11. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. ve Smith, R.J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
• Schaefer, F., Luksch, U., Steinbach, N., Cabeça, J. ve Hanauer, J. (2006). Ecological footprint and biocapacity: the world’s ability to regenerate resources and absorb waste in a limited time period. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3888793/5835641/KS-AU-06-001-EN.PDF
• Sharif, A., Baris-Tuzemen, O., Uzuner, G., Ozturk, I. ve Sinha, A. (2020). Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 57, 102138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138
• Silajdzic, S. ve Mehic, E. (2018). Trade openness and economic growth: Empirical evidence from transition economies. In Bobek, V. (Ed.) Trade and Global Market, IntechOpen, Rijeka, Ch. 2.
• Solt, F. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 97(5), 1267-1281. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12295
• Solt, F. (2020). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1183-1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12795
• Telatar, O. M. ve Birinci, N. (2022). The effects of environmental tax on ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions: A nonlinear cointegration analysis on Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 44335–44347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18740-y
• Toth, G. ve Szigeti, C. (2016). The historical ecological footprint: From over-population to over-consumption. Ecological Indicators, 60, 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.040
• Udemba, E. N. (2020). Ecological implication of offshored economic activities in Turkey: Foreign direct investment perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 38015-38028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09629-9
• Ursavaş, N. (2021). Türkiye’de demokrasinin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkisi. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 56(4), 2745-2757. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.21.11.1720
• WWF. (2019). EU overshoot day living beyond nature’s limit. http://d2ouvy59p0dg6k.cloudfront.net/downloads/wwf_eu_overshoot_day___living_beyond_nature_s_limits_web.pdf
• WWF. (2020). Living Planet Report 2020- Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Almond, R.E.A., Grooten M. and Petersen, T. (Eds). WWF, Gland, Switzerland. https://wwfin.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2020_full_report.pdf
• Yavuz, E. (2021). Çevre vergileri ile ekolojik ayak izi arasındaki ilişki: Türkiye üzerine kanıtlar, Journal Of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 7(45),1937-1945. http://dx.doi.org/10.31589/JOSHAS.784