Peyronie cerrahisinde hasta memnuniyetine etki eden faktörler

Amaç: Penil eğriliğin en sık nedeni olan peyronie hastalığı için hala en etkili tedavi yöntemini cerrrahi müdahaleler oluşturmaktadır. Fonksiyonel ve kozmetik sonuçları olan peyronie cerrahisinde hasta memnuniyetine etki eden faktörleri araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve yöntem: 2012-2019 yılları arasında peyronie hastalığı tanısı konulmuş ve peyronie cerrahisi önerilmiş hastaların kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. 1. yıl kontrollerinde hastaların erektil kapasite, rezidüel / tekrarlayan penil deformite, penil uzunluk ve potansiyel komplikasyonlar açısından preoperatif kayıtları ile birlikte değerlendirildi ve memnuniyet düzeyleri ölçülerek etki eden faktörler araştırıldı. Bulgular: Plikasyon cerrahisi (Grup 1) geçiren 27 hasta, İnsizyon safen ven greft cerrahisi (Grup 2) geçiren 21 hasta saptandı. Grup 1'de hasta memnuniyet %83,33, Grup 2'de %67,14 saptandı. Grup 2’de penil kısalma miktarı (2,71±1,41 cm) Grup 1’e (1,14±0,91 cm) göre daha fazla gözlendi. Hastaların memnuniyetine etki eden parametreler incelendiğinde; penis boyu kısalmasıyla (p=0,036), cerrahi öncesi erektil disfonksiyon varlığını belirtmekle (rho-,375, p=0,009), plak varlığıyla (p=0,002), eşlik eden komorbid hastalık varlığıyla (p

Factors affecting patient satisfaction in peyronie surgery

Purpose: Surgical interventions are still the most effective treatment management for peyronie disease, which is the most common cause of penile curvature. We aimed to investigate the factors affecting patient satisfaction in peyronie surgery with functional and cosmetic results. Material method: The records of patients who had been diagnosed with peyronie disease between 2012-2019 and who had been recommended peyronie surgery were retrospectively analyzed. In the 1st year controls, the patients were evaluated together with their preoperative records in terms of erectile capacity, residual / recurrent penile deformity, penile length, and potential complications, and the factors affecting the effects were investigated by measuring their satisfaction levels. Results: Twenty-seven patients undergoing plication surgery (Group 1), and 21 patients undergoing incision and saphenous vein graft surgery (Group 2) were identified. Patient satisfaction was 83.33% in group 1 and 67.14% in group 2. Penile shortening (2.71±1.41 cm) was higher in Group 2 than Group 1 (1.14±0.91 cm). When the parameters affecting the satisfaction of the patients are examined; there was a negative correlation between penile length (p=0.036), presence of erectile dysfunction before surgery (p=0.009), presence of plaque (p=0.002), presence of comorbid diseases (p

PDF

___

Sommer F, Schwarzer U, Wassmer G, Bloch W, Braun M, Klotz T. Epidemiology of Peyronie-s disease. Int J Impot Res 2002;14:379-383. https://doi.org/10.1038/ sj.ijir.3900863
Trost LW, Gur S, Hellstrom WJG. Pharmacological management of Peyronie’s disease. Drugs 2007;67:527-545. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495- 200767040-00004
Chung E, Ralph D, Kagioglu A, et al. Evidence-Based management guidelines on peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 2016;13:905-923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jsxm.2016.04.062
Kadıoğlu A, Salabaş E, Özmez A, et al. Peyronie`s disease surgery: surgical outcomes of 268 cases. Turk J Urol 2018;44:10-15. https://doi.org/10.5152/ tud.2018.87405
Dibenedetti DB, Nguyen D, Zografos L, Ziemiecki R, Zhou X. A population-based study of peyronie’s disease: prevalence and treatment patterns in the United States. Adv Urol 2011;2011:282503. https://doi. org/10.1155/2011/282503
Smith JF, Waalsh TJ, Lue TF. Peyronie’s disease: a critical appraisal of current diagnosis and treatment. Int J Impot Res 2008;20:445-459. https://doi.org/10.1038/ ijir.2008.30
Talib RA, Ibrahim MA, Cangüven O. Nonsurgical treatment options in Peyronie’s Disease: 2016 update. Turk J Urol 2016;42:217-223. https://doi.org/10.5152/ tud.2016.40799
Mobley EM, Fuchs ME, Myers JB, Brant WO. Update on plication prodedures for Peyronie’s disease and other penile deformities. Ther Adv Urol 2012;4:335- 346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287212448224
Essed E, Schroeder FH. New surgical treatment for Peyronie disease. Urology 1985;25:582-587. https:// doi.org/ 10.1016/0090-4295(85)90285-7
Falcone M, Preto M, Cocci A, Garaffa G. Strategies and current practices for penile lengthening in severe Peyronie’s disease cases: a systematic review. Int J Impot Res 2020;32:52-63. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41443-019-0189-9
Pryor JP, Fitzpatrick JM. A new approach to the correction of penile deformity in Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 1979;122:622-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022- 5347(17)56530-1
Licht MR, Lewis RW. Modified Nesbit procedure for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a comparative outcome analysis. J Urol 1997;158:460-463.
Syeed AH, Abbasi Z, Hargreave TB. Nesbit procedure for disabling Peyronie’s curvature: a median follow-up of 84 months. Urology 2003;61:999-1003. https://doi. org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02549-9
van der Horst C, Martinez Portillo FJ, Seif C, et al. Quality of life after surgical correction of penile deviation with the Schroeder-Essed plication. Aktuelle Urol 2003;34:109- 114. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-38907
Levine LA, Lenting EL. A surgical algorithm fort he treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 1997;158:2149- 2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)68184-9
Gholami SS, Lue TF. Correction of penile curvature using the 16-dot plication technique: a review of 132 patients. J Urol 2002;167:2066-2069.
Schultheiss D, Meschi MR, Hagemann J, Truss MC, Stief CG, Jonas U. Congenital and acquired penile deviation treated with the essed plication method. Eur Urol 2000;38:167-171. https://doi. org/10.1159/000020275
Tahra A, Küçük EV, İnkaya A. Peyroni hastalığının hafif ve orta şiddetli kurvatür tedavisinde plikasyon ve greftleme cerrahisi ile sonuçlarımız. Androl Bul 2017;19:6-9. https://doi.org/10.24898/ tandro.2017.46547
Kadirov R, Coskun B, Kaygisiz O, et al. Penile plication with or without degloving of the penis results in similar outcomes. Sex Med 2017;5:142-147. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.esxm.2017.05.001
Taylor FL, Levine LA. Surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease via tunica albuginea plication or partial plaque excision with pericardial graft: long-term follow up. J Sex Med 2008;5:2221-2228. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1743-6109.2008.00941.x
El Sakka AI, Rashwan HM, Lue TF. Venous patch graft for Peyronie’s disease. Part II. outcome analysis. J Urol 1998;160:2050-2053. https://doi. org/10.1097/00005392-199812010-00030
Montorsi F, Salonia A, Maga T, et al. Evidence-based assessment of long-term results of plaque incision and vein grafting for Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 2000;163:1704-1708.
Backhaus BO, Muller SC, Albers P. Corporoplasty for advanced Peyronie’s disease using venous and/or dermis patch grafting: new surgical technique and longterm patient satisfaction. J Urol 2003;169:981-984. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000052403.11923.51
Yurkanin JP, Dean R, Wessells H. Effect of incision and saphenous vein grafting for Peyronie’s disease on penile length and sexual satisfaction. J Urol 2001;166:1769-1772.
Adeniyi AA, Goorney SR, Pryor JP, Ralph DJ. The Lue procedure: an analysis of the outcome in Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int 2002;89:404-408. https://doi. org/10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01896.x
Kalsi J, Minhas S, Christopher N, Ralph D. The results of plaque incision and venous grafting (Lue procedure) to correct the penile deformity of Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int 2005;95:1029-1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1464-410X.2005.05459.x
Akman T, Sanli O, Gurkan L, Cakan M, Tezer M, Kadioglu A: Medial dissection of the neurovascular bundle in Peyronie’s patients with dorsal curvature: Demonstration of a technique and analysis of outcome. Book of Abstracts 8th Congress of the European Society for Sexual Medicine 2006;1:1.
Kadioglu A, Sanli O, Akman T, Cakan M, Erol B, Mamadov F. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a single center experience with 145 patients. Eur Urol 2008;53:432-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eururo.2007.04.045
Hsu GL, Chen HS, Hsieh CH, et al. Long-term results of autologous venous grafts for penile morphological reconstruction. J Androl 2007:28;186-193. https://doi. org/10.2164/jandrol.106.000760
Egydio PH, Lucon AM, Arap S. Treatment of Peyronie’s disease by incomplete circumferential incision of the tunica albuginea and plaque with bovine pericardium graft. Urology 2002;59:570-574. https://doi. org/10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01651-x
Chun JL, McGregor A, Krishnan R, Carson CC. A comparison of dermal and cadaveric pericardial grafts in the modified Horton-Devine procedure for Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 2001;166:185-188.
Barrett Harlow B, Clavell Hernandez J, Wang R. New developments in surgical treatment for penile size preservation in Peyronie’ s disease. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:156-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sxmr.2018.07.001
Hatzichristodoulou G. Grafting techniques for Peyronie’ s disease. Transl Androl Urol 2016;5:334-341. https:// doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.03.16
Hatzichristodoulou G, Osmonov D, Kübler H, Hellstrom WJG, Yafi FA. Contemporary review of grafting techniques for the surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Sex Med Rev 2017;5:544-552. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.01.006