Gökhan Alıcı, Samir Allahverdiyev, Alaa Quisi, Hazar Harbalıoğlu, Ömer Genç, Mustafa Gür, Caner Türkoğlu, Taner Şeker, Ahmet Oytun Baykan

Akut miyokart enfarktüsü olan hastalarda sorumlu lezyonun bifurkasyon lezyon olma sıklığı: seçilen tedavi stratejisinin erken ve geç dönem sonuçlara etkisi

Amaç: Bifurkasyon lezyonu olan hastalarda provizyonel teknik ile çift stent tekniğini karşılaştıran çalışmalar mevcuttur. Ancak, miyokart enfarktüsü (ME) tanısı alan ve bifurkasyon lezyonu saptanan hastalarda revaskülarizasyon tekniği ile ilgili çalışmalar yeterli değildir. Çalışmamızda ME tanısı alan ve bifurkasyon lezyonu saptanan hastalarda provizyonel yöntem ve çift stent tekniğinin erken ve geç dönem sonuçları üzerine olan etkisini araştırmayı amaçladık.Gereç ve yöntem: Miyokart enfarktüsü tanısı alan 2992 hastadan bifurkasyon lezyonu olan 385 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların Synergy between PCI with TAXUS™ and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) skoru, işlem öncesi Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) skoru, işlem süresi, anjiyografik özellikleri, işlem sonrası TIMI skoru, işlem sonrası yan dal kaybı, 30 günlük ve 1 yıllık mortalite bilgileri değerlendirildi. Bulgular: 169 (%43,9) hasta ST segment yükselmeli miyokart enfarktüsü (STYME), 216 (%56,1) hasta ST segment yükselmesi olmayan miyokart enfarktüsü (NSTYME) olarak değerlendirildi. 355 (%92,2) hastaya provizyonel teknik, 30 (%7,8) hastaya çift stent tekniği uygulandı. Provizyonel stentleme uygulanan hastaların 40’ında (%11,2) yan dal kaybı gelişti. Çift stent tekniği uygulanan hastaların 1’inde (%3,3) yan dal kaybı meydana geldi (p=0,2). Çift stent tekniği uygulanan hastalarda anjiyografi süresi ve işlem süresi anlamlı olarak daha uzundu (p

Incidence of bifurcation coronary lesion as a culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction: impact of treatment strategy on short and long term outcomes

Purpose: Although, there are several studies comparing single and two-stent techniques in patients with bifurcation lesions, evidence in patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) is still insufficient. We aimed to assess the short and long term outcomes of provisional and two-stent techniques of bifurcation lesions in patients with ACS. Materials and methods: 2992 patients with MI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled in the present study. Of 2992 patients, 385 patients with MI had bifurcation lesions. The Synergy between PCI with TAXUS™ and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score, pre-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow, post-PCI TIMI flow, duration of procedure, angiographic features, post-PCI side branch loss, 1- and 12-month mortality rates were noted. Results: 169 (43.9%) patients had ST segment elevation MI, whereas 216 (56.1%) patients had non-ST segment elevation MI. 355 (92.2%) patients underwent provisional stenting and 30 (7.8%) patients underwent two-stent technique. Side branch loss was observed in 40 patients (11.2%) in the provisional group and 1 patient (3.3%) in the two-stent group (p=0.2). Compared to provisional group, durations of angiography and revascularization in two-stent group were significantly longer (p

PDF

___

Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 1995;92:657-671. https://doi. org/10.1161/01.cir.92.3.657
Ross R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1999;340:115-126. https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJM199901143400207
Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon J, et al. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 1992;326:242- 250. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199201233260406
Takebayashi H, Haruta S, Kohno H, et al. Immediate and 3-month follow-up outcome after cutting balloon angioplasty for bifurcation lesions. J Interv Cardiol 2004;17:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 8183.2004.00246.x
Yamashita T, Nishida T, Adamian MG, et al. Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent--immediate and follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1145- 1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00534-9
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1581-1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jacc.2012.08.001
Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005;219- 227.
TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. TIMI Study Group. N Engl J Med 1985;312:932-936. https://doi. org/10.1056/NEJM198504043121437
Thomas M, Hildick-Smith D, Louvard Y, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation disease: a consensus view from the first meeting of the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 2006;2:149-153.
Sang Song P, Ryeol Ryu D, Choi SH, et al. Impact of acute coronary syndrome classification and procedural technique on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with drug-eluting stents. Clin Cardiol 2012;35:610-618. https://doi.org/10.1002/ clc.22020
Kim MC, Ahn Y, Sun Sim D, et al. Comparison of the planned one- and elective two-stent techniques in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions with or without acute coronary syndrome from the COBIS II Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018;92:1050- 1060. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27551
Hildick Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, et al. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drugeluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation 2010;121:1235-1243. https:// doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.888297
Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ, et al. A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:914-920. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.023
Maeng M, Holm NR, Erglis A, et al. Long-term results after simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: Nordic Bifurcation Study 5-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:30-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.015
Colombo A, Bramucci E, Sacca S, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-eluting stents) study. Circulation 2009;119:71-78. https://doi. org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.808402
Lassen JF, Holm NR, Banning AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from thefirst 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings. Euro Interventiol 2014;10:545-560. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV10I5A97
Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Han Y, et al. Double kissing crush versus provisional stenting for left main distal bifurcation lesions: DKCRUSH-V randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2605-2617. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066
Neumann FJ, Sousa Uva M, Ahisson A, et al. 2018 ESC/ EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019;40:87-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehy394
Cervinka P, Foley DP, Sabate M, et al. Coronary bifurcation stenting using dedicated bifurcation stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;49:105-111. https://doi. org/10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200001)49:1<105::aidccd25>3.0.co;2-2
Timurkaynak T, Ciftci H, Ozdemir M, et al. Side branch occlusion after coronary stenting with or without balloon predilation: direct versus conventional stenting. J Invasive Cardiol 2002;14:497-501.