Ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz]'in Kütahya Ekolojik Koşullarındaki Bazı Tarımsal ve Teknolojik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Bu araştırma, Kütahya ekolojik koşullarında ketencik genotiplerinin bazı tarımsal ve teknolojik özelliklerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Tarla denemesi 2013 yaz sezonunda Tesadüf Blokları Deneme Desenine göre üç tekerrürlü olarak kurulmuştur. Bu araştırmada bitki materyali olarak 9 yabancı kökenli genotip (PI304269, CR 476/65, CR 1674/90, Ames 26665, Ames 26667, Ames 26673, Ames 26676, Ames 26680 ve Ames 28372) ve bir yerli populasyon kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda bitki boyu 69,33-90,63 cm, bitki başına düşen kapsül sayısı 168.33-427.67, kapsül içindeki tohum sayısı 8.65-12.37, bin tane ağırlığı 0.08-0.13 g, bitki başına tane verimi 0.86-2.02 g olarak değiştiği belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca tohumdaki yağ içeriğinin %26,66-35,95 arasında değiştiği tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak Ames-26667, Ames-26680 ve Ames-26676 genotiplerinin diğer genotiplere göre daha avantajlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ancak kesin bir sonuca varmak için araştırmanın en az bir yıl daha devam etmesi gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Camelina, Camelina sativa, Tarımsal karakterler, Teknolojik karakterler

Determination of Some Agricultural and Technological Characteristics of Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] in Kütahya Ecological Conditions

This research was carried out to determine some agricultural and technological characteristics of camelina genotypes in Kütahya ecological conditions. The field experiment was established in the summer season of 2013 in three replications according to the Random Blocks Design. In this research 9 genotypes of foreign origin (PI304269, CR 476/65, CR 1674/90, Ames 26665, Ames 26667, Ames 26673, Ames 26676, Ames 26680 and Ames 28372) and one local population were used as plant material. As a result of the research, the plant height was 69.33 to 90.63 cm, the number of capsules per plant was 168,33 to 427,67, the number of seeds in the capsule was 8,65 to 12,37, the thousand seeds weight was 0.08 to 0.13 g, the grain yield per plant was 0,86 to 2,02 g determined. In addition, it was determined that the oil content in the seed varied between 26,66% and 35,95%. As a result, it was determined that Ames-26667, Ames-26680 and Ames-26676 genotypes are more advantageous than other genotypes. However, in order to reach a definite conclusion, the research should be carried out for at least one more year.

Keywords:

Camelina, Camelina sativa, agricultural characters, technological characters,

PDF

___

Agegnehu M., Honermeier B. Effects of seeding rates and nitrogen fertilization on seed yield, seed quality and yield components of False Flax (Camelina sativa Crtz.). Die Bodenkultur, 1997; 48(1):15-21.
Akbulut YB. Determination of yield and yield components of some variety and populations on false flax (Camelina sativa L.) in Ankara conditions, Ankara University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Master Thesis, Ankara, Turkey, 2014.
Akk E., Ilumae E. Possibilities of growing camelina sativa in ecological cultivation. Plant Breeding and Seed Production Symposium, 31 May–3 June 2005, page number: 120–122, Talsi, Lithuania.
Arslan Y., Subası I., Katar D., Kodas R., Keyvanoglu H. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on the yield and yield component of false flax (Camelina sativa L.) Crantz). Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Science 2014; 29(3):231-239.
Çoban F., Önder M. Effects of sowing densities on the important agronomic characteristics of camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] plant. Selçuk Journal of Agronomy Sciences 2014; 1(2):50-55.
Davis PH. Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands. University of Edinburg, University Edinburgh, England, 1965.
Göre M. Research to establish effects of explant sources and plant growth regulators on camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] tiller and plant induction. Ondokuz Mayıs University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Master Thesis, 121, Samsun, Turkey, 2015.
Göre M., Kurt O. Determination of yield and some agronomic characters of some camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) genotypes grown in Samsun ecological conditions. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University 2017;55(2):179-186.
Gugel RK., Falk, KC. Agronomic and seed quality evaluation of camelina sativa in Western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2006; 86:1047-1058. İnan K., Kırpık M. Determination of agronomic properties and oil content of camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) at the Adıyaman conditions. Adıyaman University Journal of Science, 2016; 6(1):85-95.
Kara K. The effects of different row spacing on yield and yield components of camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz). Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Forestry, 1994; 18:59-64.
Karahoca A., Kırıcı S. Effect of nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer on seed yield and oil content of false flax (Camelina sativa L.) in Çukurova conditions. Çukurova Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences, 2005; 20(2):47-55.
Katar D., Katar N. Effect of sowing rates in different row spacings on the yield and yield components of false flax (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz). Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 2017; 34(1):76-85.
Koç N. Determination of yield and some agronomical characteristics on false flax [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] which sown in different times. Selçuk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Master Thesis, 89, Konya, Turkey, 2014.
Koncius D, Karcauskiene D. The effect of nitrogen fertilizers, sowing time and seed rate on the productivity of Camelina sativa. Agriculture, 2010; 97(4): 37-46.
Kumari A., Mohsin M., Arya MC., Joshi PK., Ahmed Z. Effect of spacing on Camelina Sativa: A new biofull crop in India. The Bioascan An International Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences, 2012; 7(4):575-577.
Mason H. 2011. Statewide Camelina Variety Evaluation. http://ag.montana.edu/nwarc/research/VarietyEvaluation/CanolaandCamelina/11camelinavarieyeval.pdf (Date of Access: 10.03.2018).
Onat B., Arıoğlu H., Güllüoğlu L., Kurt C., Bakal H. Oil seeds and crude oil production in the world and in Turkey. KSU J Nat Sci, 2017; 20(Special Issue):149-153. Öğüt H, Oğuz H, Bacak S., Aydın F., Uygun S., Arslan Y., Subaşı İ. Pelemir biyodizelinin teknik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Enerji Tarımı ve Biyoyakıtlar 4. Ulusal Çalıştayı, 28-29 Mayıs 2014, Samsun.
Putnam DH., Budin JT., Field LA., Brene WM. Camelina: a promising low-input oilseed. In: Janick J. and Simon J. (ed.) New crops, Wiley, New York, 1993; 314-322.
Robinson RG. Camelina: a useful research crop and a potential oilseed crop. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Minn. Minn. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull, 1987.
Sadhuram Y., Maneesha K., Ramana TV. Camelina sativa: A new crop with potential introduced in India. Current Science 2010; 99(9):1194-1196.
Toncea I., Necseriu D., Prisecaru T., Balint LN., Ghilvacs MI., Popa, M. The seeds and oil composition of Camelina first romanian cultivar of camelina. Romanion Biotechalogical Letters 2013; 18(5): 8594-8602.
Urbaniak SD., Caldwell CD., Zheljazkov VD., Lada R., Luan L. The effect of cultivar and applied nitrogen on the performance of Camelina sativa L. in the Maritime Provinces of Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences 2008; 88:111-119.
Vollman J., Damboeck A., Eckl A., Schrems H., Ruckenbauer P. Improvement of Camelina sativa, and under exploited oil seed. In: Janick, J. (ed.) Progress in new crops 1996; 357-362.
Yıldırım, H., Önder, M., 2016. The effects of different fertilizer doses on some yield and quality components of camelina plant [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz]. Selçuk Journal of Agronomy Sciences, 3(1):117-122.
Zanetti F., Eynck CH., Christou M., Krzyżaniak M., Righini D., Alexopoulou E., Stolarski MJ., Loo EN., Puttick D., Monti A. Agronomic performance and seed quality attributes of camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) in multi-environment trials across Europe and Canada. Industrial Crop and Product 2017; 107: 602-608.
Zubr J. Oil-seed crop: Camelina sativa. Industrial Crops and Products 1997; 6:113-119.