Müzakereden Birlikte Yaşama Sürecine: Türk-Arap İlişkilerini Geliştirme Konusunda Metodolojik Bir Yaklaşım

Bu makale Türkler ve Türkiye’de bulunan Araplar arasında, Arap-Türk kültürel ilişkilerini geliştirmek amacı ile anlamlı bir söylem geliştirmeye olanak sağlayacak pratikte uygulanabilir bir metodoloji önermektedir. Çalışmanın özgünlüğü tanımında ve Konya-Türkiye’de akademisyenler tarafından organize edilen, Türkler ve Araplar arasında Türk ve Arap dili ile kültürü konusunda daha çok benzerlik bulma konusunda önderlik edecek söylevlerin oluşturulmasına olanak sağlayacak, akademik yuvarlak masa toplantıları ve Stammtisch buluşmalarının (düzenli gayrı resmi tartışma toplantıları) analiz edilmesindedir. Önemli diğer bir konu da Konya’da oluşturulan bu iki grubun sadece akademisyenlerden oluşmayıp aynı zamanda akademisyen olmayan sivil halktan kişileri de içermesidir. Türkler açısından incelendiğinde, yuvarlak masa toplantıları ve Stammtisch buluşmalarında örnek olarak ele alınan iki grup, sanat ve sosyal bilimler konusunda çalışan akamisyenler ve Türk sivil toplum kuruluşları için de alternatif bir metot sunmaktadır. Akademi ve sivil toplum kuruluşları açısından ele alındığında; önerilen iki farklı çalışma grubu ekonomik olmasının yanısıra Türk-Arap ilişkilerine odaklanan konuları ile uygulanabilir bir metodoloji sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Türk-Arap İlişkileri, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Stammtisch, Yuvarlak Masaları, Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları, Kamusal Alan

From Consultation to Coexistence: A Methodological Approach for Improving Turkish-Arab Relations

This article analyzes practicable methodology for facilitating a meaningful discourse between Turks and Arabs in Turkey with a purpose and scope of improving Arab-Turkishcultural relations. The originality of this article is in its description and analysis of two group types established by academicians in Konya, Turkey, formal academic roundtablesand informal Stammtisch meetings (regular informal discussion meetings), which could be used to facilitate discourses between Turks and Arabs leading to more mutual familiaritywith both Arabic and Turkish language and culture. A series of interviews was conducted with participants as a field study, regarding their experiences with formal and informalmeetings to determine the utility and effectiveness of these groups. Importantly, these two groups in Konya have involved not only academics but also involved non-academics withinthe public sphere. The example of these two group types in a Turkish context, roundtables and stammtisch meetings, presents the possibility of an alternative option of method foracademicians in arts and humanities, and also an option of method for Turkish civil society organizations (non-governmental organizations.) For academic and civil society organizations,these two group types should be economic and can be made available as methodology which can be dedicated to topics relevant to improving Turkish-Arab relations.

Keywords:

Turkish-Arab Relations, International Relations, Stammtisch, Round Tables, Civil Society Organisations, Public Sphere,

PDF

___

Abu-Rabi’, Ibrahim M., editor. Islamic Resurgence: Challenges,” Directions & Future Perspectives: A Roundtable with Prof. Khurshid Ahmad, Tampa, Fl: World & Islam Studies Enterprise. 1994; reprinted by Institute of Policy Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan, 1995; 1996.
Acuto, Michelle. “Everyday International Relations: Garbage, Grand Designs, and Mundane Matters.” International Political Sociology 8(2014): 345–362.
Acuto, Michele. “Diplomats in Crisis.” Diplomacy and Statecraft 22, no .3 (2011): 521–539.
Argon, Kemal Enz. “Turkish Sunni-Alevi Dialogue Methodology: A Proposal For Projects Using Qur'an Citations In Classical Alevi Sources.” Mütefekkir: Aksaray Üniversitesi İslami İlimler Fakültesi Dergisi 2, no.3 (2015): 25-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30523/mutefekkir.130247
Argon, Kemal Enz, "Methodology for Turkish-Arab Inter-Muslim Dialogue and Improving Relations," unpublished paper, Fourth Arab-Turkish Congress of Social Sciences, “Economy, Education and Development”, October 26 – 27, 2014 at Petra University in Amman, Jordan.
Argon, Kemal Enz, “Some Suggested Methodology for Interfaith and Intra-faith Peace Building In New Zealand”, unpublished presentation, “Aotearoa New Zealand after the 15 March terror attacks, Symposium”, 1 May 2019, University of Waikato, New Zealand.
Argon, Kemal Enz, Communicating Islam in the Public Sphere: An Intellectual History of Contemporary Islamisms in Pakistan with Special Reference to Khurshid Ahmad, Upublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK, 2010.
Björkdahl, Annika, Martin Hall, Ted Svensson, “Everyday International Relations: Editors' Introduction.” Cooperation and Conflict 54 no.2 (2019): 123-130.
Boyer, Dominic Spirit and System: Media, Intellectuals and the Dialectic in Modern German Culture. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 2005.
Boyer, Dominic. Conspiracy, history, and therapy at a Berlin Stammtisch, American Ethnologist , Volume 33 Number 3 August 2006 327-339
Çaycı, Ahmet. İslam Mimarisinde Anlam ve Sembol. Konya, Turkey. Palet Yayınları. 2017.
Guest, Greg, Emily E. Namey, Marilyn L. Mitchell, Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research. Sage Publications, London, UK; Thousand Oaks, CA, Singapore, New Delhi, India. 2013.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 1989. MIT Paperback Edition 1991. Translated by Thomas Burger from original German: Strukturwandel der Offentlichkeit. Hermann Luchterhand Verlag. Darmstadt and Neuwied, Federal Republic of Germany. 1962.
Hazama, Yasushi. “The Making of a State-Centered Public Sphere in Turkey: A Discourse Analysis.” Turkish Studies. 15, No. 2 (2014): 163–180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2013.802898
Hoexter, Miriam, Shmuel N. Eisenstadt and Nehemia Levtzion. The Public Sphere in Muslim Societies. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY. 2002.
Korkmaz, Sıddık. Alevilik-Bektaşilik Geleneği ve İslam. Konya. Kitapyurdu.com, 2016.
McKee, Alan The Public Sphere: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge UK, New York, NY, 2005.
Okay, Ayla “How Do Non-Governmental Organizations in Turkey Make Use of Public Relations in Shaping the Public Sphere? Example: the Field of Education” Istanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi 33 (2008): 121-139.
Quadir, Tarik M. Traditional Islamic Environmentalism: The Vision of Seyyed Hossein Nasr. University Press of America. Lanham, MD. 2013.
Koshar, Rudy, “From Stammtisch to Party: Nazi Joiners and the Contradictions of Grass Roots Fascism in Weimar Germany”, The Journal of Modern History 59, No. 1 (Mar., 1987): 1-24.
Turkey’s Syrian Refugees: Defusing Metropolitan Tensions Crisis Group Europe Report N°248, (29 January 2018) Available from www.crisisgroup.org
Uluç, Tahir. “Abū Manṣūr Al-Māturīdī’s Universalist Interpretation of Islam,” Ilahiyat Studies 8 No. 1 (Winter/Spring 2017): 29-64. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2017.81.158
Kemal Argon, “Academic Roundtables to Benefit Colleges and Universities (and Religious Institutions)” online article of 9/29/2014 https://www.huffingtonpost.com/kemal-argon/academic-roundtables-to-b_b_5880436.html
The Brookings Institution: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/07/18/syrian-refugees-in-turkey-need-better-access-to-formal-jobs/
TIMAV Türkiye İmam Hatiplileri Vakfı : http://www.timav.org.tr
The UN Refugee Agency Operations Portal : https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria/location/113
International Crisis Group: www.crisisgroup.org