Multiple Views of Participatory Design

Katılımcı tasarım, insan için çevreler yaratılması ve işletilmesinde kullanılan dönüştürücü güçle ilgili bir tutumdur. Bugün katılımcı tasarım süreçleri, kentsel tasarım ve planlamaya olduğu kadar, endüstri ve bilişim teknolojisi alanlarına da uygulanmaktadır. Kentlilerin ortak sonuçlar için vizyon geliştirme, stratejik planlama yapma ve müzakereci demokrasi ortamı oluşturma çalışmaları, bunların tümü de bir "topluluk'un ne olduğunu, ne yaptığını ve bunu neden yaptığını biçimlendiren ve yönlendiren eylemleri hedefler. Bunların da ötesinde, son on yıldır yürütülen katılımcı çalışmalar, toplumsal sermayenin zenginleşmesi ve topluluk duygusu paylaşımının artırılması gibi kentlileri güçlendirici (citizen empowering) yararlar ortaya koymaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

planlama

Katılımcı Tasarım Üzerine Çok Yönlü Düşünceler

Participatory design is an attitude about a force for change in the creation and management of environments for people. Today participatory design processes are being applied to urban design and planning as well as to the fields of industrial and information technology. Citizen's working towards collective outcomes, has been described as visioning, strategic planning, and deliberative democracy, all aimed at actions that shape and guide what a community is, what it does, and why it does it. Overall, studies in participation conducted during the past decade have referred to such benefits as citizen empowerment, increasing social capital and promoting a sense of community.
Keywords:

planning,

___

  • ATLEE, T. (2003) The Tao of Democracy: Using Co-Intelligence to Create a World that Works for All, The Writers Collective, Cranston, RI.
  • AVERY, M. (1981) Building United Judgement: A Handbook for Consensus Decision Making, The Center for Conflict Resolution, Madison, WI.
  • BENS, C.K. (1994) Effective Citizen Government: How To Make It Happen, National Civic Review, 83(1); 32-38.
  • BILLINGTON, R.A. (1974) American's Frontier Heritage, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
  • BODKER, K., KENSING, F. and SIMONSEN, J. (2004) Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • BOHMAN, J.F. (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy, MIT Press, Cambridge,MA.
  • BRYSON, J.M.(1988) Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations, Jossey-Basş, San Francisco, CA.
  • CAHN, E.S. and PASSETT, B.A.(1971) Citizen Participation: Effecting Community Change, Praeger, New York.
  • CARSON, L. (2003) Building sustainable democracies, paper presented at Now We Are People Conference, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
  • CHECKOWAY, B. (1986) Building citizen support for planning at the community level, Interdisciplinary Planning; A Perspective for the Future, Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ.
  • COHEN, J. (1997) Deliberation and democratic legitimacy, in J.F. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • CONNOLLY, W.E. (1969) The Bias of Pluralism, Atherton Press, New York.
  • CREIGHTON, J.L. (1994) Involving Citizens in Community Decisions Making: A Guidebook, Program for Community Problem Solving, Washington, DC.
  • DAVIDOFF, P. (1965) Advocacy and pluralism in planning, Journal of the American Institute of Planning (31) 331-338.
  • De TOCQUEVILLE, A. 1959) Democracy in America. Vintage Books, New York.
  • EHN, P.(1992) Scandinavian design: On participation and skill, in P. Adler and T. Winograd (eds.) Usability: Turning Technologies into Tools, Oxford University Press.
  • FISCHER, G., GIACCARDI, E., EDEN, H., SUGIMOTO, M. and YE, Y. (2005) Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. Human-Computer Studies (63) 482-512.
  • FORESTER, J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • GASTIL, J. (2000) By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy Through Deliberative Elections, University of California Press, Berkeley.
  • GOVE, P.B. and MERRIAM-WEBSTER (1986) Webster's New International Dictionary, Meniam-Webster, Springfield, MA.
  • GUY, B. (2002) Community Design Primer, Environmental Leadership Program, available at http: / / www.elpnet.org
  • IAP2. (2006) http: / /www.iap2.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=4
  • LIND, A.(1975) The future of citizen participation, The Futurist; 316-28.
  • KING, S. (1983) Co-Design: A Process of Design Participation, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
  • KRETZMANN, J.P. and McKNIGHT, J.L. (1993) Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets, ACTA, Chicago.
  • MANZO, L. A. and PERKINS, D. D. (2006) Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 20 (4); 336-350.
  • MOORE, C.N. and DAVIS, D. (1997) Participation Tools for Better Land-Use Planning, Local Government Commission /Center for Livable Communities, Sacramento, CA.
  • MORRIS, E.W. (1996) Community in theory and practice: A framework for intellectual renewal, Journal of Planning Literature (11)127-150.
  • MULDOON, B. (1996) The Heart of Conflict, Putnam Publishing Group.
  • OUCHI, W. (1981) Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge, Addison- Wesley, Boston, MA.
  • OLSEN, M. E. (1982) Participatory Pluralism: Political Participation and Influence in the United States and Sweden, Nelson Hall, Chicago, IL.
  • PERKINS, D.D. (1995) Speaking truth to power: Empowerment ideology as social intervention and policy, American Journal of Community Psychology 23 (5); 765-794.
  • PERKINS, D.D., BROWN, B.B. and TAYLOR, R.B.(1996) The ecology of empowerment: Predicting participation in community organizations, Journal of Social Issues, 52 (1); 85-110.
  • PICCED. Pratt Institute Center for Community and Environmental Development (2000) http: / / www.picced.org /basics / overview.htm
  • PLATO, and GRUBE, G.M.A. (1992) Republic, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, IN.
  • POISTER, T. H. and STREIB, G. (1989) Management tools in municipal government: Trends over the past decade, Public Administration Review (49) 244.
  • PRANGER, R. J. (1968) The Eclipse of Citizenship. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
  • PyGyWg (2006) Participatory Geographies Working Group,http:/ /www. geog.leeds.ac.uk / research /pygy website / about.html
  • RAPOPORT, A. (1987) Terms of empowerment exemplars of prevention: Towards a theory for community psychology, American Journal of Community Psychology, 15; 121-143.
  • REID, J.N. (2000) How People Power Brings Substantial Benefits to Communities, Washington, DC: USDA Rural Development Office, Office of Community Development.
  • RIVLIN, L. (1987) Group membership and place meanings in an urban neighborhood. Journal of Social Issues, 38(3); 75-93.
  • ROSENER, J. (1978) Matching method to purpose: The challenges of planning citizen participation activities, in Citizen Participation in America, by S. Langton (ed.), Lexington Books, New York.
  • SANOFF, H. (2000) Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning, Wiley, New York.
  • SANOFF, H. (2005) Origins of community design, Progressive Planning (166) 14-17.
  • SIRIANNI, C. and FRIEDLAND, L. (2005) Deliberative Democracy, available at http: / / www.cpn.org / tools / dictionary / deliberate.html
  • SPEER, P.W. and HUGHEY, J. (1995) Community organizing: An ecological route to empowerment and power, American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5); 729-48.
  • SPINUZZI, C (2005) The methodology of participatory design, Technical Communication 52(2); 163-174.
  • THOMAS, R.L., MEANS, M.C. and GREIVE, M.A. (1988) Taking Charge: How Communities are Planning their Futures, International City Management Association, Washington, DC.
  • THOMSON, K., BERRY, J.M. and PORTNEY, K.E. (1994) Kernels of Democracy, Lincoln Filene Center at Tufts University, Boston, MA.
  • WHITE, S. A., NAIR, K. S. and ASCROFT, J. (1994) Participatory Communications: Working for Change and Development, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA; 279.
  • WHYTE, W.F. (1991) Participatory Action Research, Sage Newbury Park, CA.
  • WINOGRAD, T. (1996) Bringing Design to Software, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
  • WULZ, F. (1986) The concept of participation, Design Studies (7) 153-162.