Ümit AYDINOĞLU

188

Yerleşim Modeli Oluşturmak Mümkün müdür? Dağlık Kilikia'dan İki Yerleşim Modeli Denemesi

In this article, the two peculiar settlement patterns of the Rough Cilicia will be investigated in detail on the basis of the architectural structures that these settlements have and their geographical locations. By doing so, it is aimed that the characteristic of the urbanization in the region will be determined in order to find out whether the factors that affect this urbanization process are external or internal the Rough Cilicia in the Hellenistic period. In the 4th and 3th century B.C., an colonization period began in the Mediterranean region. These colonization activities were carried out by the Hellenistic kingdoms in order to protect and secure their borders. The Seleucids were vigorous colonizers. The Ptolemaios established numerous colonies throughout the Aegen and eastern Mediterranean. For the Ptolemaios, Cilicia important was the ship building timber supplied. In addition to this material, Cilicia was also a source of manpower. The major elements of Ptolemaic colonization activities in the Rough Cilicia, is the use of the major cities like Nagidos and Kelenderis. The Olbian Territory which is located between Kalykadnos and Lamos rivers is distinctive amongst other Anatolian temple states because of its architectural construction in the Hellenistic Period. The construction period in the Olbian Territory was supported by Seleucus I. Nikator in the beginning of the 2nd century B.C. this period has been observed with historical and archaeological data. The main feature of settlement patterns in the territory is to gather aims in militarian and civilian conditions. This kind of settlement for defence could be called “fortification/settlement” because of its civilian and militarian feature. Other characteristic features of the settlement patterns in the territory are that acropolis and towers were constructed in the settlements and the locations of the settlements are in the borders of the valleys.
PDF

___

  • Adams – Nissen 1972 Adams, R. Mc. – H. Nissen, The Uruk Countryside: the Natural Setting of Urban Societies, Chicago.
  • Ammerman 1981 Ammerman, A. J., “Survey and Archaeological Research”, Annual Review of Anthropology 10, 63-88.
  • Ammerman 1985 Ammerman, A. J., “Plow-Zone Experiments in Calabria, Italy”, JFA 12, 33-40.
  • Barker – Llyod 1991 Barker, G. – J. Llyod (der.), Roman Landscapes: Archaeological Survey in the Mediterranean, Londra.
  • Banning 2002 Banning, E. B., Archaeological Survey, New York.
  • Binford 1982 Binford, L. R., “The Archaeology of Place”, JanthArch 1, 1-31.
  • Bintliff et al. 2000 Bintliff, J. – M. Kuna – N. Venclová, “Editorial Overview”, J. Bintliff – M. Kuna – N. Venclová (der.), The Future of Surface Artifact Survey in Europe içinde, 1-2, Sheffield.
  • Bintliff 2000 Bintliff, J., “Beyond Dots on the Map: Future Directions for Surface Artifact Survey in Greece”, J. Bintliff – M. Kuna – N. Venclová (der.), The Future of Surface Artifact Survey in Europe içinde, 3-20, Sheffield.
  • Cambi 2000 Cambi, F., “Quando i Campi hanno Pochi Significati da Estrarre: Visibilità Archeologica, Storia Istituzionale, Multi-Stage Work” Francovich, R.–H. Patterson (der.), Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages, 72-76, Oxford.
  • Cherry et al.1991 Cherry, J. F. – J. L. Davis ve E. Mantzourani, Landscape Archaeology as Long-Term History: Northern Keos in the Cycladic Islands from Earliest Settlement to Modern Times, Los Angeles.
  • Childe 1931 Childe,V. G., Skara Brae: A Pictish Village in Orkney, Londra.
  • Childe 1942 Childe,V. G., “The Chambered Cairns of Rousay”, AntJ XXII, 139- 142.
  • Crumley – Marquardt 1990 Crumley, C. L. – W. H. Marquardt, “Landscape: A Unifying Concept in Regional Analysis”, K. M. S. Allen – S.W. Gren – E. B.W. Zubrow (der.), Interpreating Space: GIS and Archaeology içinde, 73-79, New York.
  • Clarke 1973 Clarke, D., “Archaeology: the Loss of Innocence”, Antiquity 47, 6-18.
  • Dikkaya 2003a Dikkaya, F., “Epistemolojik Bir Sorun Olarak Kazıbilim” O.Erdur–G. Duru (der.), Arkeoloji: Niye? Nasıl? Ne için? içinde, 183-192, İstanbul.
  • Dikkaya 2003b Dikkaya, F., The Settlement Patterns of Altınova in the Early Bronze Age, yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Dincauze 2000 Dincauze, D. F., Environmental Archaeology: Principles and Practice, Cambridge.
  • Ebert 1992 Ebert, J. I., Distributional Archaeology, Albuquerque. Fahri Dikkaya 36
  • Evans – O’Connor 1989 Evans, J. – Terry O’Connor, Environmental Archaeology: Principles and Methods, Phonix Mill, Stroud, Gloucestershire.
  • Evans 2003 Evans, J., Environmental Archaeology and the Social Order, Londra ve New York.
  • Fagan 1991 Fagan, B.M., In the Beginning. An Introduction to Archaeology, New York.
  • Fentress 2000 Fentress, E. “What are We Counting for?”, Francovich, R. – H. Patterson (der.), Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages, 44-52, Oxford.
  • Flannery 1967 Flannery, K. V., “Culture History vs. Cultural Process: A Debate in American Archaeology”, Scientific American 217, 119-122. Hopkins 2003 Hopkins, L., Archaeology at the North-East Anatolian Frontier, VI: An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Sos Höyük and Yi¤ittafl› Village, Louvain.
  • Hodder 1982 Hodder I., Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture, Cambridge.
  • Hodder 1985 Hodder, I., “Post-Processual Archaeology”, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8, 1-26.
  • Hodder 1991 Hodder, I., Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology, Cambridge.
  • Hodder 1998 Hodder, I., Theory and Practice in Archaeology, Londra ve New York.
  • Keleş 1980 Keleş, R., Kentbilim Terimleri Sözlüğü, Ankara.
  • Kantman 1969 Kantman, S. “Trakya ve Marmara Kıyı Bölgesi Paleolitik Yerleşme Yerleri Araştırma Planlaması”, A. M. Dinçol – S. Kantman (der.), Analitik Arkeoloji içinde, 37-45, İstanbul.
  • Knapp 1997 Knapp, A. B., The Archaeology of Late Bronze Age Cypriot Society: The Study of Settlement, Survey and Landscape, Glasgow.
  • Knapp – Given 1996 Knapp, A. B. – M. Given, “A Report on the Sydney-Cyprus Survey Project (SCSP) – Third Season (1995)”, AnnRepCyp 1996, 295-366.
  • Kramer 1979 Kramer, C. (der.), Ethnoarchaeology: The Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology, New York.
  • Mallone – Stoddart 2000 Mallone, C. – S. Stoddart, “The Current State of Prehistoric Ceramic Studies in Mediterranean Survey”, Francovich, R. – H. Patterson (der.), Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages, 95-104,Oxford.
  • Mattingly 2000 Mattingly, D., “Methods of Collection, Recording and Quatification”, Francovich, R. – H. Patterson (der.), Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages, 5-15, Oxford.
  • Matthews et al 2000 Matthews, W. – C. Hastorf – B. Ergenekon, “Ethnoarchaeology: Studies in Local Villages Aimed at Understanding Aspects of the Neolithic Site”, I. Hodder (der.), Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: the Example at Çatalhöyük içinde, 177-188, Oxford.
  • Preucel 1995 Preucel, R. W., “Postprocessual Condition”, Journal of Archaeological Research 3, 147-175.
  • Renfrew 1994 Renfrew, C., “Childe and the Study of Culture Process”, D. R. Harris (der.), The Archaeology of Gordon Childe: Contemporary Perspective içinde, 121-133, Chicago.
  • Rossignol – Wandsnider 1992 Rossignol, J. – L. Wandsnider (der.), Space, Time and Archaeological Landscapes, New York.
  • Rossignol 1992 Rossignol, J., “Concepts, Methods, and Theory Building: A Landscape Approach”, Rossignol, J. – L. Wandsnider (der.), Space, Time and Archaeological Landscapes içinde, 3-16, New York.
  • Sabloff – Ashmore 2001 Sabloff, J. A. – W. Ashmore, “An Aspect of Archaeology’s Recent Past and its Relevance in the New Millennium”, G. Feinman – T. D. Price (der.), Archaeology at the Millenium: A Source Book içinde, 11-37, New York.
  • Sabloff 2004 Sabloff, J. A., “Gordon Randolph Willey: Biographical Memoirs”, PAPS 148/3, 406-410.
  • Savage 1990 Savage, S. L., “Modelling the Late Archaic Social Landscape”, K. M. S. Allen – S.W. Gren – E. B.W. Zubrow (der.), Interpreating Space: GIS and Archaeology içinde, 330-355, New York.
  • Shankland 1999 Shankland, D., “Ethno-Archaeology at Küçükköy”, Anatolian Archaeology 5, 23-24.
  • Shanks – Tilley 1987 Shanks, M. – C. Tilley, Social Theory and Archaeology, Cambridge. Thomas 2000 Thomas, J. “Introduction: the Polarities of Post-Processual Archaeology”, J. Thomas (der.), Interpreative Archaeology, A Reader içinde, 1-18, Londra.
  • Terrenato – Ammerman 1996 Terranato, N. – A. J. Ammerman, “Visibility and Site Recovery in the Cecina Valley Survey, Italy”, JFA 23, 91-109.
  • Trigger1968 Trigger, B. G., “The Determinants of Settlement Patterns”, K. C. Chang (der.), Settlement Archaeology içinde, 53-78, Palo Alto.
  • Trigger 1994 Trigger, B. G., “Childe’s Relevance to the 1990s”, D. R. Harris (der.), The Archaeology of Gordon Childe: Contemporary Perspective içinde, 9-34, Chicago.
  • Van de Velde 2001 Van de Velde, P., “An Extensive Alternative to Intensive Survey: Point Sampling in the Riu Mannu Survey Project, Sardinia”, JMA 14/1, 24-52.
  • Wilk – Rathje 1982 Wilk, R. R. – W. L. Rathje, “Household Archaeology”, R. R. Wilk – W. L. Rathje (der.), Archaeology of the Household: Building a Prehistory of Domestic Life (special issue) içinde, American Behavioral Scientist 25/6, 617-639.
  • Willey 1953 Willey, G. R., Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Viru Valley, Peru, Washington D.C.
OLBA-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-7667
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yıllık
  • Başlangıç: 1998
  • Yayıncı: Kilikia Arkeolojisini Araştırma Merkezi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Yerleşim Modeli Oluşturmak Mümkün müdür? Dağlık Kilikia'dan İki Yerleşim Modeli Denemesi

Ümit AYDINOĞLU

Yamanlar Dağı'nda Geç Antik Çağ İskanları: Kronolojik ve Mekan Organizasyonlarına İlişkin Sorunlar

Ersin DOĞER

Klazomenai'de Gömü Alanlarının Düzenlenmesi ve Kullanımı

Bilge HÜRMÜZLÜ