Beyaz Önlük veya Yeşil Ameliyathane Önlüğü Giyen Hekim Tarafından Yapılan Muayenenin Preoperatif Dental Anksiyete Üzerine Etkisinin Karşılaştırılması

Amaç: Hekimin geleneksel beyaz önlük veya ameliyathane önlüğü giymesinin preoperatif dental anksiyete üzerine etkisinin karşılaştırılması. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Diş çekimi için başvuran 411 yetişkin hastadan, 60 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi (27 erkek ve 33 kadın; yaş aralığı 18-65, ortalama yaş 42 ± 12.27). Hastalar rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Hekim bir grupta tüm çalışma boyunca uzun kollu beyaz önlük (grup 1, n=30) diğer grupta ise uzun kollu yeşil ameliyathane önlüğü giydi (grup 2, n=30). Anamnez alındıktan sonra ve muayeneden önce, her iki grupta da kaygı seviyesi görsel analog skala ile ölçüldü ve “1. ölçüm” olarak kaydedildi. Lokal anestezi yapıldıktan sonra 5 dk beklendi, anksiyete seviyesi tekrar ölçüldü ve “2. ölçüm” olarak kaydedildi. Verilerin normal dağılıma uyumuna Shapiro-Wilk testi ile bakıldı ve gruplar arası karşılaştırma için t testi, grup içi karşılaştırmalar için eşleştirilmiş t testi yapıldı. İstatistiksel önem seviyesi p .05). Sonuç: Yetişkin hastalarda beyaz önlük yeşil ameliyathane kıyafetine göre daha fazla anksiyeteye yol açmaktadır. Aşırı anksiyeteli hastalarda bu husus göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.

Aim: To compare the effect of the traditional white coat or green scrubs on preoperative dental anxiety. Material and Methods: Among 411 adult patients who applied for tooth extraction, 60 patients were included (27 males, 33 females, age between 18 and 65, mean age 42 ± 12.27). They were randomly divided into two groups. The physician wore a traditional long sleeved white coat in the first group (group 1, n=30), and a long sleeved green scrubs in the second group (group 2, n=30). After the medical history was taken and before the clinical examination, anxiety level of the patient was measured with a visual analog scale and recorded as “1. measurement”. After the local anesthesia was done, we waited for 5 minutes and the anxiety level was measured again and recorded as “2. measurement”. The compliance of the data to the normal distribution was examined by Shapiro-Wilk test, and t test was used for intergroup comparison and paired t test was employed for intragroup comparisons. Results: The initial anxiety levels of the patients in Group 1 were significantly higher than that of Group 2 (p .05). Conclusion: A traditional white coat causes more anxiety than green scrubs in adult patients. This issue should be taken into consideration in patients with severe anxiety.

___

  • 1. Humphris G, Ling MS. Behavioural sciences for dentistry. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. 149 p.
  • 2. Kritsidima M, Newton T, Asimakopoulou K. The effects of lavender scent on dental patient anxiety levels: a cluster randomised-controlled trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010;38(1):83–7.
  • 3. Plampling D. Behavioural science and dentistry. J Dent. 1990;18:286–7.
  • 4. Mattoo K, Rathi N, Goswami R. Differences in mental attitude towards extensive dental treatments between two siblings suffering from amelogenesis ımperfecta –Two case reports and literature review. IJDSR. 2014;2(6):123–7.
  • 5. Steele JG, Treasure E, Pitts NB, Morris J, Bradnock G. Total tooth loss in the United Kingdom in 1998 and implications for the future. Br Dent J. 2000;189(11):598–603.
  • 6. Lindsay SJE. The perception by dentists and patients of fear in dental treatment. In: F.J.McGuigan, editors. Stress and tension control 2. New York: Springer ABD; 1984. p. 213–22.
  • 7. Kleinknecht RA, Klepac RK, Alexander LD. Origins and characteristics of fear of dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1973;86(4):842–8.
  • 8. Kent GG, Blinkhorn AS. The psychology of dental care. 2nd ed. 1991. p. 1–28.
  • 9. Glaros AG, Gadbury-Amyot CC. How personal protective equipment affects perceptions of dentists. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993;124(10):82–8; discussion 90.
  • 10. Siegel LJ, Smith KE, Cantu GE, Posnick WR. The effects of using infection-control barrier techniques on young children’s behaviour during dental treatment. ASDC J Dent Child. 1992;59(1):17–22.
  • 11. Berscheid E, Gangestad S. The social-psychological ımplications of facial physical attractiveness. Clin Plast Surg.1982;9:289–96.
  • 12. Dunn JJ, Lee TH, Percelay JM, Fitz JG, Goldman L. Patient and house officer attitudes on physician attire and etiquette. JAMA. 1987;257(1):65–8.
  • 13. Thomas DP, Brett P. What is next in educational research? 2016. p. 285–95.
  • 14. Barrett TG, Booth IW. Sartorial eloquence: does it exist in the paediatrician-patient relationship?. BMJ. 1994;309(6970):1710–2.
  • 15. Coulthard P. Conscious sedation guidance. Evid Based Dent. 2006;7(4):90–1.
  • 16. Vagnoli L, Caprilli S, Robiglio A, Messeri A. Clown doctors as a treatment for preoperative anxiety in children: a randomized, prospective study. J. Pediatr. 2005;116(4):563–7.
  • 17. Cohen SD. Children’s attitudes toward dentists' attire. J Dent Child. 1973;40(4):285–7.
  • 18. Mistry D, Tahmassebi JF. Children’s and parents’ attitudes towards dentists’ attire. EAPD. 2009.10: 237–40.
  • 19. Kuscu OO, Çağlar E, Kayabaşoğlu N, Sandalli N. Preferences of dentist’s attire in a group of Istanbul school children related with dental anxiety. EAPD. 2009.;10:38–41.
  • 20. AlSarheed M. Children’s perception of their dentists. Eur. J. Dent. 2011.5:186–90.
  • 21. Nair BR, Mears SR, Hitchcock KI, Attia JR. Evidence‐based physicians’ dressing: a crossover trial. Med. J. Aust. 2002;177: 681–2.
  • 22. McCarthy JJ, Christine McCarthy M, Eilert RE. Children’s and parents' visual perception of physicians. Clin Pediatr. 1999;38:145–52.
  • 23. Kelly GR, Shroff B, Best AM, Tufekci E, Lindauer SJ. Parents’ preferences regarding appearance and attire of orthodontists. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(3):404–9.
  • 24. Shulman ER, Brehm WT. Dental clinical attire and infection-control procedures. Patients’ attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132(4):508–16.
  • 25. Kamavaram Ellore VP, Mohammed M, Taranath M, Ramagoni NK, Kumar V, Gunjalli G. Children and parent’s attitude and preferences of dentist's attire in pediatric dental practice. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8(2):102–7.