Sibel ÜSTÜN ÖZEK, Büşra AKBAŞ

GÖRSEL UYANDIRILMIŞ POTANSİYELLERİN NORMAL VERİLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: BİR ELEKTRONÖROFİZYOLOJİ LABORATUVARININ DENEYİMİ

Amaç: Laboratuvarımızda cinsiyete ve yaşa göre normal P100 latans ve amplitüd değerlerini karşılaştırmak amaçlandı. Materyal ve Metot: Çalışmaya 75 kadın 25 erkek toplam 100 olgu dahil edildi. Her iki göze ayrı ayrı patern VEP uygulandı. P100 latans ve amplitüdleri iki göz arasında, cinsiyet ve yaşa göre karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan olguların yaşları 10,18 ile 64,47 arasındayken, ortalama 39,07±12,57 yaş olarak saptandı. Kadınlarda ortalama latans sağda 107,15±4,56 solda 108,12±4,6 erkeklerde sağda 110,2±4,78, solda 111,76±4,47 olarak bulundu. Erkeklerde iki yanlı P100 latansları uzundu. Amplitüd değerleri kadınlarda ortalama 9,09±5,05 erkeklerde 7,32±2,48 olarak saptandı. Kadınlarda sağ (r:-0.337; p

Evaluation of Visual Evoked Potentials Normative Values: An Electroneurophysiology Laboratory Experience

Aim: To determine and compare gender and age-based normative P100 latency and amplitude values in our laboratory. Materials and Methods: 100 adults (75 female+25 male) were included in the study. VEP pattern was performed to both eyes, separately to each one. P100 latencies and amplitudes were compared between the two eyes in terms of gender and age. Results: The ages of the participants were between 10.18 and 64.47 and the mean age was 39.07 ± 12.57 years. The average of latency determined in females was 107.15 ± 4.56 in the right and 108.12 ± 4.6 in the left, in males was 110.2 ± 4.78 in the right and 111.76 ± 4.47 in the left. Bilateral P100 latencies were detected longer in males. The amplitude values were 9.09 ± 5.05 in females and 7.32 ± 2.48 in males. There was a statistically negative significant correlation between amplitude measurements in the right eyes (r: - 0.337; p

PDF

___

1. Celesia GG. Visual evoked potentials in clinical neurology. In: Aminoff MJ. Ed. Electrodiagnosis in Clinical Neurology, 5th Ed., Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2005: 453-71.
2. Emre Öge A. Yayla V. Uyandırılmış potansiyeller.içinde İtf nöroloji.e-kitap: 2019.
3. Celesia GG, Kaufman D, Cone S. Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;68(3):161-71.
4. Gupta S, Gupta G, Deshpande VK. Visual evoked potentials: Impact of age, gender, head size and BMI. International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research. 2016; 7(1): 022-6.
5. Sharma R, Joshi S, Singh K, Kumar A. Visual evoked poten-tials: normative values and gender differences. J Clin DiagnRes: JCDR. 2015;9:CC12.17
6. Gregori B, Pro S, Bombelli F, La Riccia M, Accornero N.Vep latency: sex and head size. Cln neurophysiol. 2006;117(5):1154-7.
7. Gupta S, Singh S, Gupta G, Ovais. Variations in pattern reversal visual evoked potentials during menstrual cycle in healthy females. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Chemical Research. 2013; 3(1):45-9.
8. Oken BS, Chiappa KH, Gill E. Normal temporal variability of the P100. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;68(2):153–6.
9. Mahjooba M, Shandiz HJ, Mirzajani A, Ehsaei A, Jafarzadehpur E Normative values of visual evoked potentials in Northeastern of Iran Journal of optometry. 2019;(12):192-7
10. Bulut MN, Oral AY, Bulut K Pattern VEP (Desen Görsel Uyarılmış Potansiyel) Normal Değerlerimiz Pattern VEP (Visually Evoked Potentials) Normal Values J Kartal TR. 2015;26(2):109–4
11. Sawaya R, Sawaya H, Youssef G. Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in adults: variability with age.Clinical and investigative medicine. 2017;vol40 no 6
12. Solanki JD,Naisargi NH,Mehta HB, Shah CJ Visual evoked potential: Head size, sex, and BMI.2013:579-81
13. Shaw NA, Cant BR. Age-dependent changes in the amplitude of the pattern visual evoked potential Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1981:51:671--3
14. Tandon OP, Sharma KN. Vısual Evekod Potential ın Young Adults a normative study Ind. Physiol. Pharmac. Volume S3. Number 4.1989
15. Fortune B, Zhang X, Hood DC, Demirel S, Johnson CA. Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP. Doc ophtalm. 2004;109(1):87-100
16. Dotto PF, Berezovsky A, Sacai PY, Rocha DM, Salomao SR.Gender-based normative values for pattern-reversal and flash visually evoked potentials under binocular and monocular stimulation in healthy adults Doc ophtolma. 2017;135(1): 53-67.