___

• Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., Sanford, R. N., Aron. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper and Brothers: New York.
• Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press: London.
• Chapleau, K. M. ve Oswald, D. L. (2014). A system justification view of sexual violence: Legitimizing gender inequality and reduced moral outrage are connected to greater rape myth acceptance. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 15(2), 204-218.
• Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics: North American Edition. Sage.
• Flanagan, O. (2018). Introduction: The moral psychology of anger. Myisha Cherry & Owen Flanagan (Ed.), The Moral Psychology of Anger içinde. (s. VIII-XXXI). Rowman & Littlefield International.
• Güldü, Ö. (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinde siyasal kimlik (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Güldü, Ö. (2011). Sağ Kanat Yetkeciliği Ölçeği: Uyarlama çalışması (Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale: The adaptation study). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (Ankara University Journal of Social Sciences), 2(2), 27-51.
• Hasta, D. ve Karaçanta, H. (2017). Yetkecilik, sosyal baskınlık yönelimi ve siyasal görüş. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20(40), 23-34.
• Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.
• Jost, J. T. (2011). System justification theory as compliment, complement, and corrective to theories of social identification and social dominance. David Dunning (Ed.). Social Motivation içinde. (s. 223-263). Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
• Jost, J. ve Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13(1), 111-153 . Jost, J. T. ve Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 209-232.
• Jost, J. T., Wakslak, C. J. ve Tyler, T. R. (2008), System justification theory and the alleviation of emotional distress: Palliative effects of ideology in an arbitrary social hierarchy and in society. Karen A. Hegtvedt ve Jody Clay-Warner (Ed.), Justice (Advances in Group Processes, Volume 25) içinde (s.181–211). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Karaçanta, H. (2001). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal baskınlık yönelimi ve başka bazı değişkenler açısından karşılaştırılması (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Kugler, M. B., Cooper, J. ve Nosek, B. A. (2010). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality correspond to different psychological motives. Social Justice Research, 23(2-3), 117-155.
• Lee, S. Y. (2010). Framing moral responsibility: The influence of moral emotions on persuasive health messages (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Universıty of Wisconsin-Madison.
• Montada, L. (1992). Predicting prosocial commitment in different social contexts. Pearl M. Oliner, Samuel P. Oliner, Lawrence Baron, Lawrence A. Blum, Dennis L. Krebs, M. Zuzanna Smolenska (Ed.). Embracing the Other: Philosophical, Psychological, and Historical Perspectives on Altruism içinde (s. 226-252). NYU Press, New York..
• Montada, L. ve Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3(4), 313-344.
• Pagano, S. J. (2007). A model of moral emotional reactions to injustice: Implications for psychological well-being and prosocial action (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). University of California, Los Angeles.
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. ve Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741.
• Pullant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA.
• Quasney, E. (2011). Emotional responses to gender-based inequality: Justifications and consequences (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Marquette University.
• Robinson, M. D., Watkins, E. R., ve Harmon-Jones, E. (Ed.). (2013). Handbook of cognition and emotion. Guilford Press.
• Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S. ve Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574.
• Sidanius, J. ve Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An ıntergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Storbeck, J., ve Clore, G. L. (2007). On the interdependence of cognition and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 21(6), 1212-1237.
• Tan, X., Liu, L., Huang, Z., Zhao, X. ve Zheng, W. (2016). The dampening effect of social dominance orientation on awareness of corruption: Moral outrage as a mediator. Social Indicators Research, 125(1), 89-102.
• Tan, X., Liu, L., Zheng, W. ve Huang, Z. (2016). Effects of social dominance orientation and right‐wing authoritarianism on corrupt intention: The role of moral outrage. International Journal of Psychology, 51(3), 213-219.
• Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R. ve Chen, E. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18(3), 267-274.