GERÇEKÇİ MUHAFAZAKARLIKLA MACERACILIK NÖBETLERİ ARASINDA PAKİSTAN DIŞ POLİTİKASI

Muhafazakârlık, ‘muhafazakâr dış politikanın neye benzeyeceğine dair bazı ipuçları veriyor olsa da, bu ipuçları bazen birbiriyle çelişen, çok farklı yorumlara açıktır. Sınırları çizilmiş, dış politikaya yaklaşım ve davranış anlamında iyi tanımlanmış bir muhafazakâr dış politika programından bahsetmek oldukça zordur. Pakistan dış politikası ve muhafazakârlık bağlantısı söz konusu olduğunda, Pakistan Silahlı Kuvvetleri’nin iç siyasetteki tarihsel rolü ve etkisi böyle bir değerlendirme yapmayı ayrıca zorlaştırmaktadır. Pakistan, nükleer silahlarına rağmen askeri, siyasi, ekonomik ve sosyal kaynakları oldukça kısıtlı bir ‘küçük-ölçekte’ güç olduğundan, Pakistan’ın askeri ve sivil yönetici seçkinleri Pakistan ulusal çıkarlarını savunmak amacıyla büyük oranda gerçekçi bir dış politika izlemiştir. Pakistan’ın gerçekçi muhafazakâr dış politikası, Anglo-Amerikan dünyanın muhafazakâr geleneğine oranla, büyük oranda muhafazakârsız muhafazakâr dış politikadır. Bunun da en önemli nedeni Pakistan’ın dış politika seçeneklerinin oldukça kısıtlı olmasıdır. Pakistan’da yalnızca Eyüp Han ve Navaz Şerif muhafazakâr politikacılar olarak tanımlanabilirken, her iki politikacı da muhafazakâr olarak nitelenebilecek dış politikalarını muhafazakâr kimliklerine atfetmediler. Zülfikar Ali Butto ve Ziya ül- Hak ise muhafazakâr kimlikleri olmadığı halde —ilki ‘İslami sosyalist’, ‘ikincisi İslamcı muhafazakâr’ dış politika takip ettiler. Bununla birlikte, 1965 Pakistan-Hindistan Savaşı ve 1999 Kargil Savaşı’nın da gösterdiği üzere Pakistan dış politikasında dönem dönem anti-muhafazakâr maceracılık patlamaları da yaşanmıştır.

___

  • AHMAD, I. & EBERT, H. (2013). Will Pakistan’s India policy under Sharif shift strategically? Strategic Analysis, (37) 6, 667-674.
  • AHMAD, S. (2014, December 26). Pakistan’s foreign policy — an agonizing reappraisal. The Express Tribune. Retrieved from http://tribune.com.pk/story/812138/pakistans-foreignpolicy- an-agonising-reappraisal/
  • AKHTAR, S. (1978). Pakistan and the great powers. In M. Hasan (ed.), Pakistan in a changing world: essays in honour of K. Sarwar Hasan (ss. 172-193). Karachi: Pakistan Institute of International Affairs.
  • AKHUND, I. (1987). Memories of a bystander: A life in diplomacy. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
  • ARİF, K.M. (1995). Working with Zia: Pakistan Power Politics, 1977-1988. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
  • ARMITAGE, D. (2000). Edmund Burke and reason of state. Journal of the History of Ideas, 61(4), 617-634.
  • BACEVICH, A.J. (2016, March 30). Ted Cruz embodies the degeneration of foreign-policy conservatism. The Nation. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.com/article/ted-cruzembodies- the-degeneration-of-foreign-policy-conservatism/
  • BAXTER, C. (Ed.). (2013). Diaries of field marshal Mohammad Ayub Khan 1966-1972. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
  • BENETON, P. (2011). Muhafazakârlık (C. Akalın, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim.
  • BRANDS, H. W. (1998). What America owes the world: The struggle for the soul of foreign policy. Cambridge, New York, and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  • BROOKS, D. (2016). The conservative intellectual crisis. The New York Times, October 28. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/28/opinion/the-conservativeintellectual- crisis.html?_r=1
  • CHARMLEY, J. (2011). Traditions of conservative foreign policy. In Geoffrey Hicks (Ed.) conservatism and British foreign policy, 1820-1920: The Derby’s and their world (ss. 215- 228). Ashgate.
  • Conservative vs. a Liberal—a debate (1956, March 4). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/books/00/11/26/specials/schlesinger-debate.html
  • ÇETİN, H. (2004). Muhafazakârlık: Kaosa karşı kozmos. Muhafazakâr Düşünce, 1(1), 87.
  • DUMAN, F. (2004). Edmund Burke: muhafazakârlık, aydınlanma ve siyaset. Muhafazakâr Düşünce, 1(1), 31.
  • FUKUYAMA, F. (1995). [Review of the Book Edmund Burke and international relations, by J.M. Welsh]. Foreign Affairs, (74)5, 162.
  • GEORGE, J. (2005). Leo Strauss, neoconservatism and US Foreign Policy: Esoteric nihilism and the Bush Doctrine. International Politics, (42), 174-202.
  • GERSON, M. (2016, December 19). The GOP is at its peak, but conservatism has hit rock bottom. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/thegop- is-at-its-peak-but-conservatism-has-hit-rock-bottom/2016/12/19/ebcb896e-c624- 11e6-8bee-54e800ef2a63_story.html?utm_term=.ae0286febe46
  • GHANI, N. (Ed.). (2010). Field Marshal Mohammad Ayub Khan: A selection of talks and interviews, 1964-1967. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
  • GRARE, F. (2013). Pakistan’s foreign and security policies after the 2013 general election: the judge, the politician, and the military. International Affairs, (89)4, 987-1001.
  • GÜNGÖRMEZ, B. (2004). Muhafazakâr paradigma: “dogma” ve “önyargı””. Muhafazakâr Düşünce, 1(1), 11.
  • HAGUE, W. (2009). Conservative party speeches. William Hague: The future of British Foreign Policy. 21 Temmuz. Retrieved from http://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/ speech/601323
  • HAMPSHER-Monk, I. (2015). How to think like Edmund Burke: debating the philosopher’s complex legacy. Foreign Affairs January/February.
  • HAMPSHER-Monk, I. (2005). Edmund Burke’s changing justification for intervention. The Historical Journal, (48)1, 65-100.
  • HAWKINS, A. (2011). Derby redivivus: reflections on the political achievement of the Fourteenth Earl of Derby. In G. Hicks (Ed.) Conservatism and British foreign folicy, 1820-1920: The Derby’s and their World (ss 19-41). Ashgate.
  • HICKS, G. (2011). Introduction: The Wiew from Knowsley. In G. Hicks (Ed.) Conservatism and British Foreign Policy, 1820-1920: The Derby’s and their world (ss1-19). Ashgate.
  • HUNTER, J. (2011). What’s a neoconservative? The American Conservative. Retrieved from http://www.theamericanconservative.com/2011/06/23/whats-a-neoconservative/
  • HYDER, K. (1978). Pakistan’s foreign policy in the early Seventies. In M. Hasan (Ed.), Pakistan in a changing world: essays in honour of K. Sarwar Hasan (ss97-112). Karachi: Pakistan Institute of International Affairs.
  • KHAN G. A. (2009). Testing times as foreign minister. Islamabad, Lahore & Karachi: Dost Publications.
  • KINZER, S. (2015, December 13). What truly conservative foreign policy looks like. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/12/13/what-trulyconservative- foreign-policy-looks-like/Dr6wJUyXx4ewVsk3xByw7K/story.html
  • KUX, D. (2001a) The United States and Pakistan 1947-2000: Disenchanted allies. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • LARISON, D. (2015, December 17). The American conservative: realism and restraint. The American Conservative. Retrieved from http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/ the-american-conservative-realism-and-restraint/
  • LIEVEN, A. (2012). Pakistan: a hard country. Penguin.
  • LIZZA, R. (2015, November 11). When Donald Trump met Edmund Burke. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/when-donald-trumpmet- edmund-burke
  • MARKER, J. (2016). Cover Point: impressions of leadership in Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
  • MEARSHEIMER, J. J. (2015) Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: realism versus neoconservatism. Open Democracy. Retrieved from https://www.opendemocracy.net/ democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp
  • MUKASHAF, M. (2015, April 10). Pakistan declines Saudi call for armed support in Yemen fight. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-yemen-securityidUSKBN0N10LO20150410
  • NASR, S. V. R. (2005). The rise of “muslim democracy”. Journal of Democracy, 16(2), ss 13-27
  • NAWAZ, S. (2008). Crossed swords: Pakistan, its army, and the wars within. Oxford University Press.
  • NISBET, R. (2007). Muhafazakârlık: Düş ve gerçek (K. Bülbül ve M. F. Serenli, Çev.) Ankara: Kadim
  • OAKESHOTT, M. (1962). Rationalism in Politics. London, Hertford and Harlow: Shenval Press Ltf. O’BRIEN, C. C. (2004). Introduction. In E. Burke, Reflections on the revolution in France. Penguin Books.
  • Pakistan Country Reader. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://www. adst.org/Readers/Pakistan.pdf
  • PAUL, R. (2014). Rand Paul: The Case for Conservative Realism. The National Interest. Retrieved from http://nationalinterest.org/feature/rand-paul-the-case-conservative-reaism-11544
  • REDFORD, P. & BEECH, M. (2011). David Cameron’s pragmatic ‘liberal internationalism’ approach to foreign policy differs from that of his Conservative predecessors. LSE British Politics and Policy. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/davidcameron- foreign-policy-approach/
  • SATTAR, A. (2013). Pakistan’s foreign policy: 1947-2012: A concise history (3rd ed.). Karachi: Oxford University Press.