HUKUK VE EDEBİYAT: ANLAMLI BİR İLİŞKİ

Hukuk ve edebiyat bağlamı hâlâ birçok yeniliğe açık bir alandır. Bu makalenin amacı ''hukuk ve edebiyat'' olarak adlandırılan akımın bazı önemli özelliklerini incelemek ve akımın çıkış noktası olarak kabul edilen dilbilimsel açıdan hukuk, hukukta anlatı ve hukuk ile kültür ilişkisi gibi konuları ele almaktır. Ayrıca hukuk ve edebiyatı ilişkilendiren klasik yaklaşımlara ve bu yaklaşımların gerekçelerine yer verilecektir. Mesela hukuk ve hukukçuların adlî kararların veya hukukî yorumun geliştirilmesi gibi. Görülecektir ki hukuk ve edebiyat ilişkisinin ortaya koyduğu birtakım sonuçlar sadece teori niteliği taşımayıp ayrıca uygulanabilir olmaktadır. Bu makale ''hukuk ve edebiyat'' akımına akımın üzerine inşa edildiği fikirlere ve fikirlerin olası yönlerde geliştirilmesine dair bir giriş olarak görülebilir. Türkçede hukuk ve edebiyat ilişkisi ile ilgili çok az çalışma olduğundan çevirinin değerli bir katkı sağlamasını umuyoruz. 

Law and Literature: A Meaningful Connection

The connection between law and (imaginative) literature can still affect surprisingly. The theme of the present article is to summarize some of the basic features of the movement, which is called ‘’Law and Literature” and to suggest some starting-points with which it is associated. These starting points include, for instance linguistic conception of law, narratology in law or the relations between law and culture. The article offers an overview of the classical approaches connecting law and literature and mentions the reasons for this connection: e.g. cultivation of law and lawyers, improvement of judicial decisions or improvement of legal interpretation. Some of the findings resulting from the joint of law and literature can be used in practice and goes beyond „mere” theory. The article is to be seen as an introduction to the movement of ‘’Law and Literature”, presentation of ideas on which this movement is based and offering the possibility of its further development. 

___

  • Balkin, Jack M., Levinson Sanford, “Interpreting Law and Music: Performance Notes on “The Banjo Serenader” and “The Lying Crowd of Jews”, Cardozo Law Review, c. 20, nr. 5-6, 1999 (1513-1572).
  • Benjamin, Walter, Illuminations, trans. Harry Zohn, Random House, New York, 1988.
  • Binder, Guyora, Weisberg, Robert, Literary Criticism of Law, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000.
  • Blomquist, Robert F., “Overinterpreting Law”, 2011, 25 Agustos 2015'te erişildi. Valparaiso University Legal Studies Research Paper, nr. 11-01. http:// ssrn.com/abstract=1766766. Bourdieu, Pierre, Language and Symbolic Power, trans. Gino Raymond, Matthew Adamson, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1991.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre, “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field”, The Hastings Law Journal, c. 38, nr. 5, 1987 (805-853), s. 816-817.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre, The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Çev. Susan Emanuel, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1995.
  • Brooks, Peter, “Narrative Transactions – Does the Law Need a Narratology?”, Yale Journal of Law and Humanities, c. 18, nr. 1, 2006 (1-28).
  • Cardozo, Benjamin N., “Law and Literature”, Yale Law Journal, c. 48, nr. 3, 1939 (489-507).
  • Cover, Robert, “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative”, Harvard Law Review, c. 97, nr.1, 1983 (1-68).
  • Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1998.
  • Eco, Umberto, “Interpretation and Overinterpretation: World, History, Texts”, 1990, 25 Ağustos 2015'te erişildi. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Cambridge University, http:// tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/documents/Eco_91.pdf.
  • Umberto Eco, Lector in fabula: la cooperazione interpretativa nei testi narrativi, Bompiani, Milano, 2006.
  • Fitzpatrick, Peter, The Mythology of Modern Law, Routledge, London, 1992.
  • Gaakeer, Jeanne, “The Future of Literary-Legal Jurisprudence: Mere Theory or Just Practice?”, Law and Humanities, c. 5, nr. 1, 2011 (185-196).
  • Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, Basic Books, New York, 1973.
  • Kairys, David, The Politics of Law: a progressive critique, Basic Books, New York, 1998.
  • Kornstein, Daniel J., “A Practicing Lawyer Looks Back on Law and Literature”, Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature, c. 10, nr. 2, 1998 (117-119).
  • MacCormick, Neil, “Coherence in Legal Justification”, in: Aleksander Peczenik, Lars Lindahl, Bert van Roermund (eds.), Theory of Legal Science, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1984, s. 235-251.
  • Minda, Gary, Postmodern Legal Movements, New York University Press, New York, 1995.
  • Posner, Richard A., “Law and Literature: A Relation Reargued”, Virginia Law Review, c. 72, nr. 8, 1986 (1351-1392).
  • Saussure, Ferdinand De, Course in General Linguistics, transl. Wade Baskin, Philosophical Library, New York, 1959.
  • Stempowski, Tomasz, Prawo i film – instrukcja obsługi”, in: Tomasz Stempowski, Piotr Grabarczyk (red.), Prawo w fi lmie, C. H. Beck, Warszawa, 2009.
  • Tait, Allison, Norris, Luke, “Narrative and the Origins of Law”, Law and Humanities, c. 5, nr. 1, 2011 (11-22). Wambaugh, Eugene, “Light Reading for law Students”, Law Bulletin of the State University of Iowa, c. 2, nr. 28-31, 1891-1893.
  • White, James Boyd, “Law as Language: Reading Law and Reading Literature”, Texas Law Review, c. 60, nr. 3, 1982 (415-445).
  • White, James Boyd, The Legal Imagination, University of Chicago Press, London, 1985. Weisberg, Richard H., “Wigmore and the Law and Literature Movement”, Law and Literature, c. 21, nr. 1, 2009 (129-145).
  • Weisberg, Richard H., “Wigmore’s “Legal Novels” Revisited: New Resources for the Expansive Lawyer”, Northwestern University Law Review, c. 71, nr. 1, 1976 (17-28).
  • Weisberg, Richard H., Kretschman, Karen L., “Wigmore’s “Legal Novels” Expanded: A Collaborative Effort”, The Maryland Law Forum, c. 7, nr. 2, 1977-1978 (94-103).
  • Wigmore, John H., “A List of Legal Novels”, Illinois Law Review, c. 2, nr. 9, 1907-1908 (574-593).