Gökçe TUĞDEMİR KÖK, Durmuş Ali DEVECİ

6077

FREIGHT TRANSPORT MODE CHOICE WITH STATED PREFERENCE METHOD: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Modeling transport choice is one of the most important components of transportation analysis since it determines the parties to be involved, the resources to be used and the impact made on the environment. Many different techniques have been used to analyze choice modelling. As a principle, all choice modelling techniques suppose that goods/services can be defined in terms of their characteristics or attributes and the levels. In stated preference methods, decision makers evaluate and decide on the multi-attribute and mutually exclusive alternatives they prefer. Aim of the study is to analyze the studies that use the stated preference method in transport mode choice in terms of transportation modes, study area, decision-makers, decision variables and general findings. For this purpose, a systematic literature review method has been conducted for freight mode choice using “stated preference method”. A systematic literature review from relevant academic studies has indicated such transportation choice variables through as transport time, transport cost, transport mode, flexibility, frequency, reliability, risk of delay/punctuality, risk of loss and damage and service quality. To analyze the freight transport choice, discrete choice experiments which are one of the stated preference techniques have been the most preferred methods. According to literature review, most effective variables in choosing freight transport mode are transport cost, transport time and reliability. Additionally, it has been found that the features involved as effective variables in the preferred freight route / mode selection experiments indicated are most strongly confirmed by applying more mechanical, more easily and less subjective applied approaches to the literature review.
Keywords:

Freight Forwarders, Freight Transportation, Mode Choice Shippers, Stated Preference,

PDF

___

  • Adamowicz, V. and Boxall, P. (2001). “Future Directions of Stated Choice Methods for Environment Valuation.” Choice Experiments: A New Approach to Environmental Valuation. London, UK, April 10.
  • Akay, D. (2016). Uluslararası Lojistikte Taşıma Modu Seçimini Etkileyen Faktörler: Türkiye Uygulaması ve bir Model Önerisi, Master Thesis: Karatay University, Social Science Institute.
  • Alpizar, F. and Carlsson, F. (2001). “Policy Implications and Analysis of the Determinants of Travel Mode Choice, an Application of Choice Experiments to Metropolitan Costa Rica.” Costa Rica: Working Paper in Economics no. 5, Department of Economics, Göteborg University.
  • Anciaes, P.R.; Jones, P.; Metcalfe, P.J. (2018). A Stated Preference Model to Value Reductions in Community Severance Caused by Roads.” Transportation Policy, Vol. 64, pp. 10–19.
  • Anderson, N. H. (1970). “Functional Measurement and Psychophysical Judgment.” Psychol. Re Vol. 77, pp. 153-70
  • Arencibia, A. I., Feo-Valero, M., García-Menéndez, L., and Román, C. (2015). “Modelling Mode Choice for Freight Transport Using Advanced Choice Experiments.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 75, pp. 252-267.
  • Arunotayanun, K., and Polak, J. W. (2011). “Taste heterogeneity and market segmentation in freight shippers’ mode choice behavior.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 47, No.2, pp. 138-148.
  • Bacca, J., Baldiris, S. and Fabregat, R. (2014). “Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications,” Journal of Education, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 133–149, 2014.
  • Bando, T., Fukuda, D, Wicaksono, A. and Wardan, L. K. (2015). “Stated Preference Analysis for New Public Transport in a Medium-sized Asian City: A Case Study in Malang, Indonesia.” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.11.
  • Banomyong R. and Beresford K.C. (2001). “Multimodal Transport: The Case of Laotian Garment Exporters. International Journal of Physical Distribution.” Logistics Management, Vol. 31, pp. 651-673
  • Bardi, E. (1973). “Carrier Selection from One Mode.” Transportation Journal, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 22-29.
  • Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Ozedemiroglu, E., Pearce, D., Sugden, J.and Swanson, J. (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Bergantino, A. S. and Bolis, S. (2008). Monetary Values of Transport Service Attributes: Land versus Maritime Ro-Ro Transport. An Application using Adaptive Stated Preferences.” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 159-174.
  • Bergantino, A.S., Bierlaire, M., Catalano, M. and Migliore, M. (2013). “Taste Heterogeneity and Latent Preferences in the Choice Behavior of Freight Transport Operators.” Transport Policy, Vol. 30, pp. 77-91.
  • Beuthe, M. and Bouffioux, C. (2008). “Analyzing Qualitative Attributes of Freight Transport from Stated Orders of Preference Experiment.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 105-128.
  • Bolis, S. and Maggi, R. (1998). “Adaptive Stated Preference Analysis of Shippers’ Transport and Logistics Choice”, the 38th ERSA Conference, Vienna.
  • Burdg, H. B. and Daley, J. M. (1985). “Shallow-Draft Water Transportation: Marketing Implications of User and Carrier Attribute Perceptions.” Transportation Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 55-67.
  • Catalano, M., Lo Casto, B. and Migliore, M. (2008). “Car sharing demand estimation and urban transport demand modelling using stated preference techniques”. European Transport, pp. 33-50.
  • Competition Commission (2010). Review of Stated Preference and Willingness to Pay Methods, April 2010, London.
  • Coyle, J. J., Bardi, E.J. and Langley, C. J. (1996). The Management of Business Logistics. West Publishing Company: Minneapolis.
  • Cullinane K. and Toy N. (2000). “Identifying İnfluential Attributes in Freight Route/Mode Choice Decisions: A Content Analysis”, Transportation Research Part E, pp. 49-51
  • Danielis, R. (2002) Freight Transport Demand and Stated Preference Experiments, Milan: Franco Angeli.
  • Danielis, R. and Marcucci, E. (2007). “Attribute Cut-Offs in Freight Service Selection.” Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 43, pp.506-515.
  • Denktaş Şakar, G. (2010). Transport Mode Choice Decisions and Multimodal Transport: A Tringulated Approach. Dokuz Eylül University Printing Office, İzmir
  • Deveci, D. A. (2010). “Türkiye’de Çoklu Taşımacılığın Geliştirilmesine Yönelik Stratejik bir Model Önerisi.” Dokuz Eylul University Journal of Maritime Faculty, Vol. 2, No.1, pp. 13-32.
  • Duan, L., Peng, Q., and Tang, Y. (2016). “Railway Shippers’ Heterogeneous Preferences with Random Parameters Latent Class Model.” Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 25, pp. 416–424
  • Feo, M., Espino, R. and Garcia, L. (2011). “A Stated Preference Analysis of Spanish Freight Forwarders Modal Choice on the South-West Europe Motorway of the Sea.” Transport Policy, Vol. 18 pp. 60-67.
  • Feo-Valero, M., Garcia-Menendez, L. and Del Saz-Salazar, S. (2016). Rail Freight Transport and Demand Requirements: an Analysis of Attribute Cur-Offs through a Stated Preference Experiment.”. Transportation, Vol.43, pp. 101-122.
  • Finn A. and Louviere J. J. (1992). “Determining the Appropriate Response to Evidence of Public Concern: The Case of Food Safety.” Journal of Public Policy Marketing, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 12-25.
  • Flynn T. N., Louviere J. J., Peters T. J. and Coast J. (2007). “Best–Worst Scaling: What It Can Do for Health Care Research and How To Do It.” Journal of Health Econ. Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.171-189
  • Fowkes, T. and Tweddle, G. (1988). Computer Guided Stated Preference Experiment for Freight Mode Choice, PTRC SAM
  • Garcia-Menendez, L., Marinez-Zarzoso, I. And Pinero De Miguel, D. (2004). “Determinants of Mode Choice between Road and Shipping for Freight Transport.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 447-466.
  • Gilmour, P. (1976). “Some Policy Implications of Subjective Factors in the Modal Choice for Freight Movement.” Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 12, No.1, pp. 39-57.
  • Golias, J. Ve Yannis, G. (1998). “Determinants of Combined Transport’s Market Share.” Transport Logistics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 251–264)
  • Gourdin, K. N. (2006). Global Logistics Management, Second Edition, Austuralia: Blackwell Publising.
  • Gubbins, E. J. (2003). Managing Transport Operations, Kogan Page Limited: London.
  • Hammond, K. R. (1955). “Probabilistic Functioning and the Clinical Method.” Psychology Review, Vol. 62, pp. 255–262.
  • Hartgen, D.T. (1974). “Attitudinal and Situational Variables Influencing Urban Mode Choice: Some Empirical Findings.” Transportation, Vol. 3, pp. 377–392.
  • Hayuth, Y. (1987). Intermodality: Concept and Practice, Lloyd’s of London Press: London.
  • Hensher, D. A. (1994). “Stated preference analysis of travel choices: The state of practice”. Transportation, Vol. 21, No.2, pp. 107-133.
  • Jovicic, G., (1998). Application of Models Based on Stated and Revealed Preference Data for Forecasting Danish International Freight Transport, Tetraplan AS, Aalborg, June 1998
  • Khooban, Z., Farahani R.Z., Rezapour S. ve Kardar L. (2011). Transportation. Logistics Operations and Management: Concepts and Models, London: Elsevier.
  • Kim, H.C., Nicholson, A. and Kusumastuti (2017). “Analysing Freight Shippers’ Mode Choice Preference Heterogeneity Using Latent Class Modelling” Transportation Research Procedia, No. 25C, pp. 1109-1125.
  • Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Joint Technical Report. Keele, UK.
  • Kjaer, T. (2005). A Review of the Discrete Choice Experiment - with Emphasis on its Application in Health Care, Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark.
  • Koppelman, F.S. and Bhat, C. (2006). “A Self Instructing Course in Mode Choice Modeling: Multinomial and Nested Logit Models.” Elements Vol. 28, pp. 501–512.
  • Köfteci, S. (2008). Bir Kara Ulaştırma Koridorunda Yük Taşımacılığı Tür Seçiminden Lojistik Maliyete Göre Modellenmesi. Doktora Tezi. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Krapfel, F. E. And Mentzer, J. T. (1982). “Shippers Transportation Choice Processes under Deregulation.” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 11, No.2, pp. 117-124.
  • Lancaster, K. J. (1966). “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 132-157
  • Larranaga, A. M., Arellana, J., Senna, L. A. (2017). “Encouraging Intermodality: A Stated Preference Analysis of Freight Mode Choice in Rio Grande do Sul.” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 102, pp. 202-211.
  • Li, Z. And Hensher, D. (2012). “Accommodating Risk Attitudes in Freight Transport Behavior Research.” Transport Reviews, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 221-239
  • Louviere, J.J. (1984). “Hierarchical Information Integration: A New Method for the Design and Analysis of Complex Multi-Attribute Judgement Problems”. In: Th C Kinnear (Ed.) Advances in Consumer Research Volume XI, Pp. 148–155 (Association of Consumer Research, Provo).
  • Manski, C.F. (1977). “The Structure of Random Utility Models.” Theory and Decision, Vol. 8, pp.229-254.
  • Matear, S. And Gray, R. (1993). “Factors Influencing Freight Service Choice for Shippers and Freight Suppliers.” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 25-36.
  • Mcfadden, D. (1974). “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.
  • Mckinnon, A. C. (1989). Physical Distribution Systems. Routledge: London.
  • Murphy, P. R. And Hall, P. K. (1995). “The Relative Importance of Cost and Service in Freight Transportation Choice Before and After Deregulation: An Update.” Transportation Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 30-38.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2011). Impacts of Public Policy on Freight Transportation System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Noda, S. (2004). “Container Shipping and Security Issues: The Carriers’ Responsibility in the Fight against Terrorism.” Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 157-186.
  • Norojono, O., Young, W., (2003), “A Stated Preference Freight Mode Choice Model”, Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 26, No.2, 195-212.
  • Nugroho, M. T., Whiteing, A. and de Jong, G. (2016). “Port and Inland Mode Choice from the Exporters’ and Forwarders’ Perspectives: Case Study – Java, Indonesia.” Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 19, pp. 73-82.
  • Patterson, Z.R., Ewing, GO. And Haider, M. (2007). “Shipper Preferences Suggest Strong Mistrust of Rail: Results from Stated Preference Carrier Choice Survey for Quebec City-Windsor Corridor in Canada.” In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2008, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Pp. 67-74
  • Pavlyuk, D., & Gromule, V. (2010). Discrete Choice Model for a Preferred Transportation Mode. Riga, Latvia: Transport and Telecommunication Institute, Lomonosova 1, LV-1019.
  • Pederson, E. L. and Gray, R. (1998). “The Transport Selection Criteria of Norwegian Exporters.” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 108-120.
  • Ranaiefar, F., Regan, A. (2011). Freight-transportation externalities. In: Logistics Operations and Management: Concepts and Models. USA
  • Regmi, M. B., and Hanaoka, S. (2015). “Assessment of Modal Shift and Emissions along a Freight Corridor between Laos and Thailand.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 192-202.
  • Richter, C. and Keuchel, S. (2012). Modelling Mode Choice in Passenger Transport with Integrated Hierarchical Information Integration.” Journal of Choice Model, Vol. 5, pp. 1–21.
  • Saleh, F. And Das, C. (1974). “Transport Service Choice: Punctuality or Speed?” International Journal of Physical Distribution. Vol. 4, No.5, pp. 297-304
  • Shinghal, N. (2002). An Application of Stated Preference Methods to the Study of Intermodal Freight Transport Services in India. PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
  • Shinghal, N. and Fowkes, A. S. (2002). “Freight Mode Choice and Adaptive Preferences.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 367-378.
  • Šimeček, M., & Dufek, J. (2016). “A Freight Modal Shift Model for Slovakia.” Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 14, pp. 2814-2819.
  • Thurstone, L.L. (1927). “A Law of Comparative Judgment.” Psychological Review, Vol. 34, pp. 273-286
  • Torres-Carrion, P. V., Gonzalez-Gonzales, C.S., Silvana, A., Rodriguez-Morales, G. (2018). IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference
  • Train, K. and Wilson, W.W. (2008). “Estimation on Stated-Preference Experiments Constructed from Revealed-Preference Choices.” Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 42, pp. 191-203.
  • Tuna, O. and Akarsu, M. (1999).”Freight Transport Service Buying Process: a General Model for Exporters.” Strategic Approches for Maritime Industries in Poland and Turkey, Ergün, M. and Zurek, J., Ed., Vol 1., Dokuz Eylul Publications, Izmir, Turkey, pp. 1-15.
  • Van der Waerden, P., Borgers, A., Timmermans, H., & Berenos, M. (2007). Users Evaluation of Transport Mode Characteristics with Special Attention to Public Transport. Berkeley, USA: 11th World Conference on Transport Research.
  • Vannieuwenhuyse, B, Gelders L and Pintelon L. (2003). “An On-line Decision Support System for Transportation Mode Choice” Logistics Information Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 125-133
  • Vega, A., Feo-Valero, M., Espino-Espino, R. (2018). “The Potential Impact of Brexit on Ireland’s Demand for Shipping Services to Continental Europe.” Transport Policy, Vol. 71, pp. 1-13.
  • Vermeireni, T. and Macharis, C. (2016). “Intermodal Land Transportation Systems and Port Choice, an Analysis of Stated Choices among Shippers in the Rhine-Scheldt Delta.” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.43, No.8, pp. 992-1004.
  • Witlox, F. and Vandaele, E. (2005). “Determining the Monetary Value of Quality Attributes in Freight Transportation Using a Stated Preference Approach.” Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 77-92.
  • Wittenberg, E., Bharel, M., Bridges, J. F. P., Ward, Z. and Weinreb, L. (2016). “Using Best-Worst Scaling to Understand Patient Priorities: A Case Example of Papanicolaou Tests for Homeless Women.” The Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 356-364.
  • Wu, W. and Ye, J. (2019). “Typical Combined Travel Mode Choice Utility Model in Multimodal Transportation Network.” Sustainability, Vol. 11.
Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2019
  • Yayıncı: Mersin Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Volkan EFECAN, Ender GÜRGEN

ANALYSIS OF MARINE ACCIDENTS IN THE STRAIT OF İSTANBUL USING QUALITATIVE&QUANTATIVE METHODS

Nur Jale ECE

Gökçe TUĞDEMİR KÖK, Durmuş Ali DEVECİ

ANALYSIS OF MARINE ACCIDENTS IN THE STRAIT OF İSTANBUL USING QUALITATIVE&QUANTATIVE METHODS

Nur Jale ECE

Nergis ÖZİSPA, Durmuş Ali DEVECİ

Taha Talip TÜRKİSTANLI, Barış KULEYİN