Öğretmenlerin ve Öğretmen Adaylarının BT Kullanma Niyetleri: BT'yi Okullarla Bütünleştirmede Anahtar Faktörler

Çalışmada, öğretmen adaylarının gelecekteki derslerinde BT kullanma niyetlerini ve onların niyetlerini gerçekleştirebilmelerini etkileyen faktörleri ortaya çıkarmak amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda nitel içerikli basit betimsel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada 21 öğretmen adayıyla ve 13 öğretmenle gruplar halinde branş bazında görüşmeler yürütülmüştür. Verilerin analizinde içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre öğretmen adaylarının gelecekteki derslerinde BT kullanma niyetlerini; BT'ye yönelik yarar algısı, kullanım kolaylığı algısı, sosyal etki, kolaylaştırıcı şartlar faktörleri etkilemektedir. Öğretmen adaylarının BT kullanma niyetlerini gerçekleştirmelerini belirlemek amacıyla öğretmenlerle yapılan görüşmelerde; okulun alt yapı yetersizlikleri, öğrenci profili problemleri, eğitim ve bilgi yetersizlikleri, hizmet öncesi eğitimlerin yetersizlikleri ortaya çıkarılmıştır.

Teachers and Preservice Teachers Intentions to Use ICT: The Keys to ICT Integration in School

The purpose of this study was to reveal the pre-service teachers' intentions to use ICT in their future classes and the factors influential on their realizing their intentions. Simple descriptive research which is qualitative design was used, and branch-based focus group interviews were held with 21 preservice teachers and 13 in-service teachers in three-person groups. Data were analyzed through content analysis, and four factors influential on pre-service teachers' intentions were found to be "perceived usefulness", "perceived ease of use and efficacy", "social influence", and "facilitating conditions". According to the results, the top factors affecting the realization of their intentions were "lack of infrastructure of schools", "student profile problems", "education and knowledge gaps", and "inadequacy of pre-service training".

___

  • Anderson, S., Maninger, R, (2007). Preservice teachers' abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, (2), 151-172.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice.
  • Baydaş, Ö., Gedik, N. ve Göktaş, Y. (2013). Öğretmenlerin bilişim teknolojileri kullanımı: 2005-2011 y111ar1n1n karşılaştırılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3, 41-54.
  • Birch, A., Irvine, V. (2009). Preservice teachers' acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: applying the UTAUT model. Educational Media International, 46 (4), 295-315.
  • Brown, D., Warschauer, M. (2006). From the university to the elementary classroom: Students' experiences in learning to integrate technology in instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14 (3), 599-621.
  • Buchanan, T., Sainter, P., Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25 (1), 1-11.
  • Carpenter, J. M., Green, M. C., Laflam, J. (2011). People or profiles: Individual differences in online social networking use. Personality and Individual Difi'erences, 50 (5), 538-541.
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C.--C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology Society, 13 (4), 63-73.
  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit--Leftwich, A., York, C. S. (2006--2007). Exemplary technologyusing teachers: Perceptions of factors influencing success. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23 (2), 55--61
  • Gao, P., Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., Wu, J. (2009). Developing better understanding of technology-based pedagogy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25 (5), 714--730.
  • Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICT integration into preservice teacher education programs. Educational Technology Society, 12 (1), 193-204.
  • Hew, K. F., Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research Development, 55, 223--252.
  • Hsu, P. S., Sharma, P. (2006). case study of the change process of technology integration into science methods course from 1997 to 2003. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education sunulan bildiri, Orlando, FL.
  • Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38 (4), 383--408.
  • Keengwe, ., Onchwari, G., Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student learning: barriers and promise. Journal of Science of Education Technology, 17, 560-- 565
  • Koh, J. H. L., Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre--service teachers' technology integration expertise through the TPACK--developing instructional model. Journal of Educational Computing Research,44 (1), 35-58.
  • Kreijns, K., Van Acker, F., Vermeulen, M., van Buuren (2013). What stimulates teachers to integrate ICT in their pedagogical practices? The use of digital learning materials in education. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (1), 217--225.
  • Lawless, K. A., &Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614.
  • Lei, ., Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: longitudinal study. Computers Education, 49(2), 284--297.
  • Lim, C. P., Chai, C. S., Churchill, D. (2010). Leading [C in education practices: capacitybuilding toolkit for teacher education institutions in the asia-pacific. Singapore: Microsoft.
  • Lim, C. P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, S. C., Tsai, C. C. (2013). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of technology in schools. Journal of Educational Technology Society, 16 (2), 59-68.
  • Lisowski, L., Lisowski, J. A., Nicolia, S. (2006). lnfusing technology into teacher education: Doing more with less. Computers in the schools, 23 (3), 71-92.
  • Liu, S. (2012). multivariate model of factors influencing technology use by preservice teachers during practice teaching. Educational Technology Society, 15 (4), 137-- 149.
  • Mishra, P., Koehler, M. ., Kereluik, K. (2009). The song remains the same: Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53 (5), 48-53.Peeraer, ., Van Petegem, P. (2012). Measuring integration of information and communication technology in education: An item response modeling approach. Computers Education, 58 (4), 1247-1259.
  • Pempek, T., Yermolayeva, A.Y., Calvert, LS. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on facebook. Journal ofApplied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227--238.
  • Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C. E., Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow's teachers to teach With technology (PT3) grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 863--870.
  • Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Tondeur, J., van Braak, ., Duyck, W., Duyck, P. (2011). Predicting secondary school teachers' acceptance and use of digital learning environment: cross--sectional study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 568--575
  • Rabab, E.--S. H. E.-S., &Samar, E.-H. A. E.-R. E.-S. (2013). Video-based lectures: An emerging paradigm for teaching human anatomy and physiology to student nurses. Alexandria Journal ofMedicine, 49 (3), 215--222.
  • Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., &Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers' intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies using Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45 (2), 171-196.
  • Sadi, S., Şekerci, A. R., Kurban, B., Topu, F. B., Demirel, T., Tosun, C., Demirci, T. ve Göktaş, Y. (2008). Öğretmen eğitimde teknolojinin etkin kullanımı: Öğretim elemanları ve öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, (3), 43--49.
  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, ., Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers Education, 54, 103--112.
  • Shen, C. X., Liu, R. D., Wang, D. (2013). Why are children attracted to the Internet? The role of need satisfaction perceived online and perceived in daily real life. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (1), 185--192.
  • Tataroğlu Taştan, B., Çelik, A. ve Erduran, A. (2013). Matematik öğretmen adaylarinin matematiksel düşünme ve öğrencilerin matematiksel düşünmelerinin geliştirilmesi hakkındaki görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 21 (4) 1487-1504.
  • Teo, T., Tan, L. (2012). The theory of planned behavior (TPB) and pre-service teachers' technology acceptance: validation study using structural equation modeling. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20 (1), 89-104.
  • Tondeur ., van Braak J., &Valcke M. (2006) Primary school curricula and the use of ICT in education. Two worlds apart? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (6), 962-- 976
  • Tondeur, J., Van Keer, H., van Braak, ., Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: challenging the potential of school policy. Computers Education, 51, 212'223.
  • Torres--Ramirez, M., Garcia--Domingo B., Aguilera, J., de la Casa, J. (2014). Video-sharing educational tool applied to the teaching in renewable energy subjects. Computers Education, 160-177.
  • Tosuntas, S. B., Karadag, E., Orhan, S. (2015). The factors affecting acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard within the scope of FATIH project: structural equation model based on the Unified Theory of acceptance and use of technology. Computers Education, 8] (2015), 169--178.
  • Turan, Z., Küçük, S. ve Gündoğdu, K. (2013). Öğretmen eğitiminde bilişim teknolojilerinin kullanımı: Mevcut ve beklenen durum. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, (1), 1--9.
  • UNESCO Institute of Statistics (2006). ICTs and education indicators: Suggested core indicators based on meta--analysis of selected International School Surveys.
  • Valtonen, T., Dillon, P., Hacklin, S., Vaisanen, P. (2010). Net generation at social software: challenging assumptions, clarifying relationships and raising implications for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 49 (6), 210--219.
  • Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Sormunen, K., Dillo, P., Sointu, E. (2015). The impact of authentic learning experiences with ICT on pre-service teachers' intentions to use ICT for teaching and learning. Computers Education, 8] (2015), 49--58. Vrocharidou, A., Efthymiou, I. (2012). Computer mediated communication for social and academic purposes: profiles of use and university students' gratifications. Computers Education, 58 (1), 609-616.
  • Wachira, P., Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teachers perspectives. Journal of Science of Education Technology, 20, 17--25.
  • Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, A., Boshuizen, P. A. H. (2008). Information-problem solving: review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (3), 623--648.
  • Way, ., Webb, C. (2007). Pedagogy, innovation and e-Learning in primary schools. Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education sunulan bildiri. Adelaide.
  • Wise, J. C., Toto, R., Lim, K. Y. (2006). Introducing Tablet PCs: Initial results from the classroom. 36th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Engineering Conference sunulan bildiri. Chicago, IL.
  • Yetkin--Özdemir, İ. E. (2008). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematik öğretiminde materyal kullanımına ilişkin bilişsel becerileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 362-373.
  • Yildirim, S. (2007). Current utilization of ICT in Turkish basic education schools: review of teacher's ICT use and barriers to integration. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34 (2), 171-186.