External fire-escape stairs risk analysis: A case study in İstanbul

External fire-escape stairs risk analysis: A case study in İstanbul

External fire escape stairs are used in many countries. They are recognised as building elements that can minimise loss of life in case fire safety precautions are inactive or inadequate. However, external fire escape stairs pose more risk than fire exit stairs, and they have characteristics that pose hazards during access or usage in terms of fire safety. A pilot study conducted in 10 districts of Istanbul showed that the risks are high in external fire escape stairs in the city. According to the results of this study, the districts with the highest number of hazard sources on the external fire-escape stairs are Beyoğlu, Beşiktaş, and Şişli. The aim of this study is to reveal the risks related to fire safety and to prevent or reduce the harm that these risks may cause to users by reviewing the physical conditions of the fire escape stairs in the buildings in the three districts of Istanbul, where the number of hazard sources is the highest, in order to ensure that escape from the buildings in fires is both easy and fast and does not pose a danger to the safety of the user. In this context, using a model consisting of three stages a case study was carried out in the Şişli, Beşiktaş, and Beyoğlu districts of Istanbul. Data on hazard sources were collected in a total of 600 buildings, including 200 buildings with external fire-escape stairs in each of the three districts where the case study was conducted. The risks that may be experienced in the fire escape stairs in these districts were analysed, the results of the analysis were discussed and district-based risk maps were created. The number of hazard sources questioned in the pilot study was increased by new hazard sources identified in the research project. According to the results of the analysis study, a total of 3,580 hazard sources were determined in the interrogation conducted on 18 hazard sources. Among the three districts, the district with the highest risk value is Beyoğlu and the district with the lowest is Beşiktaş. In these districts, necessary actions are decided and recommendations are developed to control the risks and eliminate or reduce the effects of the hazard sources on the users.

___

  • Avlar, E. and Yıldırım, H. S. (2020). The analysis of risks inherent in external fire escape stairs, through a new model proposal. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 35(2):871– 885.
  • Başdemir, H. and Demirel, F. (2010). A literature review of passive fire safety precautions in buildings. Journal of Polytechnic 13(2):101–109. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/politeknik/issue/ 33053/367867.
  • BBR (2016). Boverket’s building regulations-mandatory provisions and general recommendations. Sweden: Code of Statutes of the Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning (Boverket) 6.
  • Brushlinsky, N., Ahrens M., Sokolov, S., and Wagner, P. (2020). World fire statistics. No: 25. International Association of Fire and Rescue Services, National committees CTIF of Russia, Germany, USA. BS 9999 (2017). Code of practice for fire safety in the design, management and use of buildings. UK: British Standards Institution.
  • Chris, W. (2012). A guide to emergency lighting. London: The British Standards Institution.
  • Department Fire of Brigade (2020). Statistics. İstanbul: Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality.
  • Gigova, R., Ilyushina, M., and Mackintosh, E. (2018). Entire class of schoolchildren feared dead in Russian shopping mall fire. CNN Word. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/27/europe/russia- kemerovo-shopping-mall-fire-intl/index.html, (accessed: 5 September 2020).
  • IMM and BU (2020). Istanbul province Beşiktaş, Şişli and Beyoğlu district probable earthquake loss estimates booklet. Istanbul: Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Boğaziçi University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Department of Earthquake Engineering.
  • Jeffrey, S. T. and Brain, J. M. (2007). Egress design solutions: A guide to evacuation and crowd management planning. ARUP, New Jersey, Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Kılıç, A. (2016). Student dormitory fire. Fire and Safety Magazine 187:8–10.
  • Neuman, S. (2018). At least 64 dead in shopping mall fire in central Russia. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/ sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/26/596921954/40- dead-in-shopping-mall-fire-in-central-russia, (accessed: 12 September2020).
  • NFPA 101 (2021). Life safety code. USA: National Fire Protection Association.
  • Potton, E., Ares, E., and Wilson, W. (2017). Grenfell Tower fire: response and tackling fire risk in high rise blocks. (Briefing Paper No. 7793). UK: House of Commons Library.
  • Ronchi, E. and Nilsson, D. (2013). Fire evacuation in highrise buildings: A review of human behaviour and modelling research. Fire Science Review 2(7):1–21.
  • Ronchi, E., Reneke, P. A., Kuligowski, E. D., and Peacock, R. D. (2014). An analysis of evacuation travel paths on stair landings by means of conditional probabilities. Fire Safety Journal (65):30–40.
  • SNIP 21-01-97 (1997). Fire safety of buildings and structures. Moscow: Resolution of the Ministry of Construction of the Russian Federation.
  • Spearpoint, M. and Maclennan, H. A. (2012). The effect of an ageing and less fit population on the ability of people to egress buildings. Safety Science 50(8):1675–1684.
  • Turkey’s Regulation on Fire Protection (2015). Official Gazette, 2015/29411, Turkey.