The risks and benefits of non-predictive splenectomy: The necessity of splenectomy and early postoperative outcomes

Although, most splenectomy is predictive due to preoperative tests, sometimes the decision to perform the splenectomy is made intraoperatively for non-primary splenic diseases. The aim of this study to investigate the risks, benefits and necessity of non-predictive of splenectomy and early outcomes. Splenectomy was performed as predictive splenectomy (PS) for primary splenic diseases and non-predictive splenectomy (Non-PS) for non-primary splenic diseases. Preoperative, operative, and 1-month postoperative data included to study. Between June 2012 and July 2018, 108 patients underwent splenectomy. Of these patients, 67 (62%) had PS for primary splenic disease, and 41 (38%) had non-PS due to non-primary splenic diseases. Patients with PS were statistically younger compared to Non-PS patients (52.82 ± 15.07 vs. 44.32 ± 19.23 years, p = 0.022). The most common cause of splenectomy in the PS group was immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in 16 (23.9%) and splenic trauma in 16 (23.9%), whereas in the non-PS group the major causes were gastric cancer in 16 (39%) and pancreas cancer in 10 (24.4%). Patients in the PS group had significantly lower postoperative hospital stay day (11.2 ± 7.3 vs. 6.4 ± 4.2, p = 0.001). The total complication rate was statistically higher in the non-PS patients (31.7% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.012). However, no significant differences were found in the postoperative infection rates (17% in non-PS versus 7.5% in PS, p = 0.22). Even if the preoperative investigation does not show any indication for splenectomy, but the surgeon has intraoperative concerns about sub-optimal oncological surgery without splenectomy, we recommend that the surgeon should perform the splenectomy.

___

Brunicardi FC, Anderson DK, Billiar TR, et al. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery, Tent Editon, 34th Chapter. 2015, p. 1420-39.

Katz SC1, Pachter HL. Indications for splenectomy. Am Surg. 2006 ;72:565-80.

Rodeghiero F, Ruggeri M. Short- and long-term risks of splenectomy for benign haematological disorders: should we revisit the indications? Br J Haematol. 2012;158:16-29.

Bagrodia N, Button AM, Spanheimer PM, et al. Morbidity and mortality following elective splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic conditions: analysis of the american college ofsurgeons national surgical quality improvement program data. JAMA Surgery.2014;149:1022-29.

Edgren G, Almqvist R, Hartman M, et al. Splenectomy and the risk of sepsis: a population-based cohort study. Ann Surg 2014;260:1081–87.

Sinwar PD. Overwhelming post splenectomy infection syndrome - review study. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1314-16.

Xiang L, Tu Y, He T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy for the management of splenic hilum metastasis in cytoreductive surgery of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Gynecol. Oncol. 2016;27:62-3.

Weitz J, Jaques DP, Brennan M, et al. Association of splenectomy with postoperative complications in patients with proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:682–89

Yu W, Choi GS, Chung HY. Randomized clinical trial of splenectomy versus splenic preservation in patients with proximal gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:559–63.

Sano T, Sasako M, Mizusawa J, et al. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate splenectomy in total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2017;265:277-83.

Usui S, Tashiro M, Haruki S, et al. Spleen preservation versus splenectomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: A comparison of short-term outcomes. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016;9:5-13.

Son SY, Shin DJ, Park YS, et al. Spleen-preserving lymphadenectomy versus splenectomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Oncol. 2017;26:207-211.

Yoo YJ, Yang SJ, Hwang HK, et al. Overestimated oncologic significance of lymph node metastasis in g1 nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumor in the left side of the pancreas. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 ;94:1404.

He Z, Qian D, Hua J, et al. Clinical comparison of distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:91593.

Tang CW, Feng WM, Bao Y, et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy or distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy?: Perioperative and patientreported outcome analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48:62-6

Shoup M, Brennan MF, McWhite K, et al. The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2002;137:164-8.

Lolle I, Pommergaard HC, Schefte DF, et al. Inadvertent splenectomy during resection for colorectal cancer does not ıncrease long-term mortality in a propensity score model: a nationwide cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:1150-59.

Sun H, Bi X, Cao D, et al. Splenectomy during cytoreductive surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:3473-82.

Djaldetti M, Bergman M, Salman H, et al. On the mechanism of postsplenectomy leukocytosis in mice. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003;33:811-17.

Morgan TL, Tomich EB. Overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI): a case report and review of the literature. J Emerg Med. 2012;43:758-63.

Yong M, Thomsen RW, Schoonen WM, et al. Mortality risk in splenectomised patients: a Danish population-based cohort study. Eur J Intern Med. 2010;21:12-6.

Di Sabatino A, Lenti MV, Tinozzi FP, et al Vaccination coverage and mortality after splenectomy: results from an Italian single-centre study. Intern Emerg Med. 2017;12:1139-47.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The association between TLR4 polymorphisms and pulmonary tuberculosis

Refika Dilara VAİZOĞLU, Harika Gözde GÖZÜKARA BAĞ, Ceren ACAR

Assessment of vitamin D level in Hashimoto thyroiditis in Turkish population

Banu Şarer YÜREKLİ, Ezgi BELLİKÇİ KOYU, Hatice ÖZIŞIK, Dilek ONGAN, Gökhan ÖZGEN

Prevalence of frailty syndrome and related factors in older adults living in a nursing home

Şemsinnur GÖÇER, OSMAN GÜNAY

Diagnostic utility of chest pain characteristics in discriminating obstructive coronary artery disease: A ‘Historic’ Dilemma

DEMET ÖZKARAMANLI GÜR

Common Demodex spp. identified on the arm and abdominal region of patient monitored for widespread pruritus

YASEMİN KAYA, SEVDA ÖNDER, Ülkü KARAMAN, Gamze KAÇMAZ

Can bevacizumab administered together with beta radiation in treatment of pterygium play a role in additive effect and/or treatment of the side effects?

Yasemin BENDERLİ CİHAN, Fatma BAĞCI

Terra firma-forme dermatosis: Two cases

Dursun TURKMEN

Comparison of patient specific quality assurance tests done with using different dosimetric systems for intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment plans

Kamil Erkan ÖZGEN, Şükran ESKİCİ ÖZTEP, Mehmet Bahadır ÇELİK, Eda Bengi YILMAZ, Mehmet KABADAYI

Association between heart rate turbulence and anxiety symptom levels

BUĞRA ÖZKAN, Özcan ÖRSÇELİK, Cevahir ÖZKAN, Mert Koray ÖZCAN, Ayça ARSLAN, AHMET ÇELİK, İsmail Türkay ÖZCAN

Accurate diagnostic algorithm for patients with rare pathology of thenar intramuscular lipomas

Zafer ATBAŞI, YUSUF ERDEM