Evaluation of the results of the proximal femoral nail surgery for intertrochanteric femur fractures

Evaluation of the results of the proximal femoral nail surgery for intertrochanteric femur fractures

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological results of the patients who underwent proximal femoral nail (PFN) surgery due to intertrochanteric femur fractures (IFF). A total of 195 patients who underwent PFN surgery due to IFF in January 2014 and January 2018 in our institute and with at least six months follow-up periods were included in the study. Demographic data, comorbidities, Evans-Jensen fracture classification, anesthesia risk scores, hospitalization duration, time to surgery, duration of surgery, amount of blood loss, whether additional traumas exist, quality of reduction, complication rates, Harris hip scores (HHS), Fogagnolo Reduction Quality criteria and possible correlations between these variables were evaluated retrospectively. In our study, the majority of the patients were found to be between the ages of 70-90. Hypertension was found to be the most common comorbid disease in the patients (50.2%). The fracture type of the majority of the patients was determined as type 4. The majority of patients were identified as ASA III and ASA IV group patients (38.4% and 35.9%, respectively). Successful HHS was found at a rate of 77.5%. As the fracture type worsened, the HHS score worsened (p

___

  • 1. Yu X, Wang H, Duan X, et al. Intramedullary versus extramedullary internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fracture, a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018;52:299-307.
  • 2. Koval K, Zuckerman J. Intertrochanteric Fractures. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, editors. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 2. Philedelphia: Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults; 2001;1635-63.
  • 3. Hinton RY, Lennox DW, Ebert FR, et al. Relative rates of fracture of the hip in the United States. Geographic, sex, and age variations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:695-702.
  • 4. Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;8; CD000093.
  • 5. Tyllianakis M, Panagopoulos A, Papadopoulos A, et al. Treatment of extracapsular hip fractures with the proximal femoral nail (PFN): long term results in 45 patients. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004;70:444-54.
  • 6. D'Arrigo C, Carcangiu A, Perugia D, et al. Intertrochanteric fractures: comparison between two different locking nails. Int Orthop. 2012;36:2545- 51.
  • 7. Lewinnek GE, Kelsey J, White AA 3rd, et al. The significance and a comparative analysis of the epidemiology of hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;152:35-43.
  • 8. Baumgaertner M. Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures. In: Browner D, Jupiter J, Levine A, Trafton P, editors. Skeletal trauma. 2: WB Saunders Company; 2003;1776–816.
  • 9. Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M Jr, Paccola CA. Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124:31-7.
  • 10. Tuzun S, Eskiyurt N, Akarirmak U, et al; Turkish Osteoporosis Society. Incidence of hip fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis in Turkey: the FRACTURK study. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:949-55.
  • 11. DeLee J. Fractures and dislocations of the hip. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, editors. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 2. Philedelphia: Lippincott–Raven; 1996;1659-827.
  • 12. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, et al. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone. 1996;18:57-63.
  • 13. Bateman L, Vuppala S, Porada P, et al. Medical management in the acute hip fracture patient: a comprehensive review for the internist. Ochsner J. 2012;12:101-10.
  • 14. Temiz A, Durak A, Atici T. Unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in geriatric patients treated with the DLT trochanteric nail. Injury. 2015 ;46:S41-6.
  • 15. Yoon BH, Baek JH, Kim MK, et al. Poor prognosis in elderly patients who refused surgery because of economic burden and medical problem after hip fracture. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28:1378-81.
  • 16. Stern MB, Goldstein TB. The use of the Leinbach prosthesis in intertrochanteric fractures of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;128:325- 31.
  • 17. Ricci WM. New Implants for the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures. Tech Orthop. 2008;23:222-31.
  • 18. Kourtzis N, Pafilas D, Kasimatis G. Management of pertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patients with an external fixation. Injury. 2001;32:115-28.
  • 19. Lavelle D. Fractures and dislocations of the Hip. In: Canale S, Beaty J, editors. Campell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 11 ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Year Book; 2008;3237–85.
  • 20. Saudan M, Lübbeke A, Sadowski C, et al. Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:386-93.
  • 21. Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F, et al. The proximal femoral nail (PFN)- -a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:53-8.
  • 22. Banan H, Al-Sabti A, Jimulia T, et al. The treatment of unstable, extracapsular hip fractures with the AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN)- -our first 60 cases. Injury. 2002;33:401-5.
  • 23. Kim SY, Kim YG, Hwang JK. Cementless calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2186-92.
  • 24. Kesmezacar H, Ogut T, Bilgili MG, et al. Yaşlilarda intertrokanterik femur kiriklarinin tedavisi: Internal tespit mi, hemiartroplasti mi? [Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients: internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2005;39:287-94.
  • 25. Kenzora JE, McCarthy RE, Lowell JD, et al. Hip fracture mortality. Relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery, and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;186:45-56.
  • 26. Smektala R, Endres HG, Dasch B, et al. The effect of time-to-surgery on outcome in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;29;9:171.
  • 27. Zuckerman JD, Sakales SR, Fabian DR, et al. Hip fractures in geriatric patients. Results of an interdisciplinary hospital care program. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:213-25.
  • 28. Zuckerman JD, Skovron ML, Koval KJ, et al. Postoperative complications and mortality associated with operative delay in older patients who have a fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1551-6.
  • 29. Hamlet WP, Lieberman JR, Freedman EL, et al. Influence of health status and the timing of surgery on mortality in hip fracture patients. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997;26:621-7.
  • 30. Bannister GC, Gibson AG, Ackroyd CE, et al. The fixation and prognosis of trochanteric fractures. A randomized prospective controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;254:242-6.
  • 31. Lenich A, Mayr E, Rüter A, et al. First results with the trochanter fixation nail (TFN): a report on 120 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126:706- 12.
  • 32. Georgiannos D, Lampridis V, Bisbinas I. Complications following Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures with the Gamma3 Nail: Is the Latest Version of Gamma Nail Superior to Its Predecessor? Surg Res Pract. 2014;2014:143598.
  • 33. Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999;30:327-32.
  • 34. Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JW, et al. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury. 2002;33:395-9.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Engineering, production, and immunogenicity studies of a truncated form of rabies virus glycoprotein produced in Nicotiana benthamiana plant

Tarlan MAMEDOV, Gülshan MAMMADOVA, Nedim MUTLU, Nilüfer GUN, İrem GÜRBÜZASLAN, Damla YÜKSEL, Gülnara HASANOVA

Factors affecting mortality and morbidity in acute pancreatitis

Mehmet SERTKAYA, Fatih Mehmet YAZAR, Ahmet Necati ŞANLI, Arif EMRE

The relationship between preoperative anxiety levels and posttraumatic stress disorder in women having curettage: A prospective study

Didem ŞİMŞEK KÜÇÜKKELEPÇE, Ceyda BAŞOĞUL, Hacer ÜNVER

Associations among chondromalacia patella and meniscopathy in youthful, active individuals with chronic anterior knee pain

Bünyamin ARI, Mehmet AKÇİÇEK

Antibiotic susceptibility of escherichia coli strains isolates determined as a cause of urinary tract infection in pediatric patients

Ali GÖZÜKÜÇÜK, Basri ÇAKIROĞLU

Identification of marker proteins in preterm and term birth: Relationship of rankl and HSP70 in the cord blood

Selçuk GÜREL, Barış UZUNOK

The effect of mesenchymal stem cell-lyophilizate on the proliferation of A549 cells by regulation of JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway

Fatma Nilay TUTAK, Haluk ULUCA

A rare manifestation of giant cell arteritis: Bilateral scalp necrosis

İsmail Okan YILDIRIM, Ayşegül ÖZGÜL, Rafet ÖZBEY, Dursun TÜRKMEN, Serpil ŞENER, Nihal ALTUNIŞIK, Mücahit MARSAK, Server YOLBAŞ

Inter-observer agreement of the musculoskeletal system disability levels of individuals presenting at disability health boards

Musa POLAT, Nusret AYAZ

New approaches in treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

Ebru KOCA