Comparison of results of revision total knee arthroplasty surgery due to septic and aseptic loosening

The purpose of this study was to share the clinical, functional and radiological results of patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) for septic or aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty. 34 patients who were diagnosed with septic (n=19) or aseptic (n = 15) loosening after total knee arthroplasty and underwent single stage (aseptic group) or two-stage (septic group) RTKA surgery between May 2015 and June 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with septic loosening were checked again with clinical and laboratory evaluations for the second stage of revision surgery at the postoperative 3rd and 6th weeks. The changes in the joint line before and after the surgery were measured radiographically. The classification of the defects was performed by using the Anderson Orthopedic Research Institute criteria. Preoperative and postoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) was completed by all patients. KSS scores were a statistically significant increase observed in the postoperative values compared to the preoperative ones in both groups (p = 0.001). Moreover, there was a statistically higher increase observed among the aseptic loosening patients compared to the septic patients and the preoperative period in the KSS scores (p = 0.001). In terms of the preoperative distance between the fibular styloid and distal part of the femoral component used in the evaluation of the joint line, it was observed that postoperatively, there was a higher increase in among the patients with septic loosening TKA compared to the aseptic loosening TKA (p = 0.002). As a result, restoration of the joint line is a very important parameter in RTKA, and the increase in joint distance negatively affects the results clinically and functionally. Two-stage surgical treatment in septic loosening TKA is an effective and successful surgical method for the prevention reinfection.

___

Courpied JP, Caton JH. Total HipArthroplasty, state of the art forthe 21st century. Int Orthop. 2011;35:149–50.

Ritter MA. The anatomical graduated component total knee replacement: a long-term evaluation with 20-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:745-9.

Bourne RB, Crawford HA. Principles of revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:331-37.

Suarez J, Griffin W, Springer B, et al. Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail? J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(6 Suppl 1):99–103.

Jämsen E, Stogiannidis I, Malmivaara A, et al. Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:67–77.

Rand JA. Modular augments in revision total kneearthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:347-53.

Takahashi Y, Gustilo RB. Nonconstrained implants in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994;309:156-62.

Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: Knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:205-17.

Healy WL, Della Valle CJ, Iorio R, et al. Complications of total knee arthroplasty: standardized list and definitions of the Knee Society. Clinical Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:215–20.

Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–5.

Shahi A, Parvizi J. Prevention of periprosthetic joint infection. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015;3:72–81.

Parvizi J, Jacovides C, Zmistowski B, et al. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection: is there a consensus? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3022–30.

Pabinger C, Berghold A, Boehler N, et al. Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21:263–8.

Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, et al. Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1329–32.

Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today–has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1774–8.

Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic joint infection. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1645-54.

Trampuz A, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, et al. Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. Am J Med. 2004;117:556-62.

Giulieri SG, Graber P, Ochsner PE, et al. Management of infection associated with total hip arthroplasty according to a treatment algorithm. Infection. 2004;32:222-28.

Resit Sevimli, Okan Aslanturk , Kadir Ertem , et al. An investigation of infection rate and seasonal effect level in total joint replacement cases. Med Sci. 2020;9:802-5.

Stammers J, Kahane S, Ranawat V, et al. Outcomes of infected revision knee arthroplasty managed by two-stage revision in a tertiary referral centre. Knee. 2015;22:56–62.

Mortazavi SM, Vegari D, Ho A, et al. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: predictors of failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3049–54.

Tigani D, Trisolino G, Fosco M, et al. Two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection: Influence of host health status and infecting microorganism. Knee. 2013;20:9–18.

Claassen L, Radtke K, Ettinger M, et al. Preoperative diagnostic for periprosthetic joint infection prior to total knee revision arthroplasty. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2014;6:5437.

Zywiel MG, Johnson AJ, Stroh DA, et al. Prophylactic oral antibiotics reduce reinfection rates following two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2011;35:37–42.

Bratzler DW, Hunt DR. The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:322-30.

American Dental Association, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with total joint replacements. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134:895-99.

Lum ZC, Natsuhara KM, Shelton TJ, et al. Mortality during total knee periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:3783-88.

Cancienne JM, Granadillo VA, Patel KJ, et al. Risk factors for repeat debridement, spacer retention, amputation, arthrodesis, and mortality after removal of an infected total knee arthroplasty with spacer placement. J Arthroplasty. 2017;33:515e20.

Ghanem E, Pawasarat I, Lindsay A, et al. Limitations of the Knee Society Score in evaluating outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2445-51.

Bılgen O, Durak K, Atici T. Total diz protezi revizyonu erken donem sonucları. Uludag Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi. 2001;27:1-19.

Wirries N, Winnecken HJ, Lewinski GV, et al. Osteointegrative sleeves for metaphyseal defect augmentation in revision total knee arthroplasty: Clinical and radiological 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:2022-29.

Laskin, Richard S. Joint line position restoration during revision total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:169-71.

Nett MP. Scuderi GR. Revision of aseptic failed total knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. 2012;1327-45.

Gustke KA. Preoperative planning for revision total knee arthroplasty: Avoiding chaos. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(4 Suppl 2):37–40.

Rand JA, Peterson LF, Bryan RS, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1986;35:305–18.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

CT evaluations by emergency medicine specialists in Covid-19 patients

Kemal Gokcek, Omer Dogan Alatas

Pilot testing the new Amit Jain’s scoring system for diabetic foot ulcer in predicting the risk of amputation

Amit Kumar C Jain, Apoorva HC, Kishore Kumar

PFAPA (periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis) syndrome in children; surgical versus medical treatment?

Yuksel TOPLU, Tuba BAYINDIR, Mehmet TEKİN, M. Tayyar KALCIOĞLU

Evaluation of the effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on plasma and cerebrospinal fluid beta-endorphin levels in rats

Canan Kucuk, Nihal Kadiogullari

A retrospective comparison of systemic and local methotrexate therapy applied before uterine curettage in caesarean scar pregnancy

Ugurkan Erkayiran, Tufan Arslanca, Jan Bozkurt

Comparison of clinical and quality of life outcomes of patients who underwent early postoperative rehabilitation and cast immobilization after Achilles tendon repair

Turan Bilge KIZKAPAN, Sinan OĞUZKAYA, Gökay EKEN, Seçkin BAŞILGAN

Radiological imaging findings of the hepatic tuberculosis

Mustafa KOÇ

Prevalence and predictors of 25-OH Vitamin D deficiency in peritoneal dialysis patients: A single center study

Dilek BARUTÇU ATAŞ, Arzu VELİOĞLU, Murat TUĞCU, Hakkı ARIKAN, Ebru AŞÇIOĞLU

Macro-CK in carbon monoxide poisoning: A guide for in-hospital mortality?

ERDAL TEKİN, Oktay GÜLCÜ, Uğur AKSU, Mustafa BAYRAKTAR

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on medication adherence in psychiatric disorders

Bahadır DEMİR, Esra GUNEYSU, Muhammet SANCAKTAR, Şengül KOCAMER ŞAHİN, Gülçin ELBOĞA, Abdurrahman ALTINDAĞ