Comparison of hemodynamic response for intubation and propofol pain caused by lidocaine administration with infusion and tourniquet

Propofol is one of the most widely used i.v. anesthetic agent. Nevertheless, pain following i.v. administration of propofol is an important problem in anesthesia induction. A wide range of studies have been performed related to lidocaine effects on propofol injection pain and hemodynamic response to intubation. However, effect of both situations are seldomly studied in the literature. In our study we compare lidocaine effects on propofol injection pain and hemodynamic response to intubation which is given by infusion or under tourniquet as i.v. bolus. 70 patients attended to the study are separated randomly into two groups of 35 patients. Prior to induction, lidocaine has been infused with infusion pump as to be completed in 2 minutes with concentration of 2%, total dosed 1mg/kg in infusion group (Group I, n=35). In this group, after half of the total lidocaine dose is infused (1st minute), anesthesia induction has been started by giving 40 mg propofol of 1% in 10 seconds with infusion pump. In tourniquet group (Group T, n=35) prior to induction 1mg/kg lidocaine has been given as bolus by applying tourniquet with 70 mm/Hg pressure to the arm that is established vascular access and tourniquet has been remained for 60 seconds. After opening the tourniquet, induction has been started by giving 40 mg propofol of 1% in 10 seconds with infusion pump. During induction, patient‟s consciousness was evaluated by questioning his/her name and age after administering 1/4 (VRS0), 1/2 (VRS1), and 3/4 (VRS2) of total propofol dose. Confused patients were eliminated and the sense of pain caused by propofol was evaluated in study patients. The results were recorded according to four-point categorical verbal rating scale (VRS). For groups, the pulse rates and mean arterial pressures before lidocaine administration (T0), after lidocaine (T1), immediately after intubation (T2) and 10th minute after intubation (T3) were recorded. No differences detected among the groups with regards to demographic data and side effects. (p>0.05). No significant differences statically detected when comparing the heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pain scores of groups for all times (p>0.05). It is concluded that administering lidocaine by infusion technic may be an alternative method for tourniquet method on suppressing hemodynamic response related to tracheal intubation and on preventing injection pain related to propofol

___

1. Lea-Febirger Endotrakeal Anesthesia Complications. Collins VJ. Editor: Principles of Anesthesia; .3th edition, Philedelphia. 1993;1:571-5.

2. Reddy MS, Chen FG, Ng HP. Effect of ondansetron pretreatment on pain after rocuronium and propofol injection: a randomised, doubleblind controlled comparison with lidocaine. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:902.

3. Tan CH, Onsiong MK. Pain on injection of propofol. Anaesthesia. 1998;53(5):468-76.

4. Kam E, Abdul-Latif MS, McCluskey.Comparison of propofol-lipura with propofol mixed with lidocaine 10 mg on propofol injection pain. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:1167-9.

5. Yokota S, Komatsu T, Komura Y. Pretreatment with topical 60% lidocaine tape reduces pain on injection of propofol. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:672-4.

6. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS. Anaesthesia for patients with cardiovascular disease. Clinical Anesthesiology, 3th edition. Appleton & Lange, Stamford. 2002:393-4.

7. Nakane M., Iwama H. A potential mechanism of propofol induced pain on injection based on studies using nafamostat mesilate. BJA. 1999;83(3);397- 404.

8. Abdullah H. Yeşim E. Serdar Y. Laringoskopi ve entübasyona hemodinamik yanitin baskilanmasinda lidokain, fentanil ve magnezyum sülfat´in etkilerinin karşilaştirilmasi. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi. 2000;15(3):144-7.

9. Macario A, Weinger M, Truong P, Lee M. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are both common and important to avoid? The perspective of a panel of expert anesthesiologists. AnesthAnalg. 1999;88:1085-91.

10. Nıtın S, Lakshmi J, Mamta S. Prevention of propofol pain: a comparative study. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2009,20.1:71-4.

11. Hynynen M, Korttila K, TammistoT. Pain on i.v. injection of propofol (IC135 868) in emulsion formulation: Short communication. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1985;29:651-2.

12. McCrirrickA, Hunter S. Pain on injection ofpropofol: The effect of injectate temperature. Anaesthesia. 1990;45:443- 4.

13. Lu Y, Zhang Y, Wong GT, Dong C, Yu J. Prevention of injection pain due to propofol by dezocine: A comparison with lidocaine. Indian J Pharmacol. 2013;45:619-21.

14. McCulloch MJ, Lees NW. Assessment and modification of pain on induction with propofol (Diprivan). Anaesthesia. 1985;40:1117-20.

15. Mangar D, Holak EJ. Tourniquet at 50 mm Hg followed by intravenous lidocaine diminishes hand pain associated with propofol injection. Anesth Analg. 1992;74:250-2.

16. Lai YY, Chang CL, Yeh FC. The site of action oflidocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia. Ma ZuiXueZaZki. 1993;31:3134.

17. Scott RPF, Saunders DA, Norman J. Propofol: Clinical strategies for the preventing the pain of injection. Anaesthesia. 1988;43 492-4.

18. Wilkinson D, Anderson M, Gauntlett I. Pain on injection of propofol: modification by nitroglycerin. Anesth Analg. 1993;77:1139-42.

19. Huang YW, Buerkle H, Lee TH. Effect of pretreatment with ketorolac on propofol injection pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46: 1021-420.

20. Ewart MC, Whitwam JG. Prevention of pain during injection of propofol. Lancet. 1990;335:798-9.

21. Memiş D, Alpaydın T, Pamukçu Z. Laringoskopi ve trakeal entübasyonla gelişen kardiyovasküler yanıtların önlenmesinde esmolol, alfentanil, fentanil ve lidokainin karşılaştırılması. Türk Anesth Rean Cem Mecmuası. 1999;27:513-6.

22. Tam S, Chung F, Campbell M. Intravenous lidocaine: Optimal time o f injection before tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:1036-9.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Little negligence leading to irreparable harm: Thinner burns

Kemal ARSLAN, Arif ATAY, TAMER SEKMENLİ, METİN GÜNDÜZ, Osman DOĞRU, İlhan ÇİFTÇİ

Containment of the health care associated infections by adhering to hand hygiene practices

Jegadeesh RAMASAMY, Prateek Saurabh SHRİVASTAVA, Saurabh RamBihariLal SHRIVASTAVA

A case of myocardial infarction together with acute appendicitis in Emergency Clinic of Turgut Ozal Medical Center

Mehmet Ediz SARIHAN, ŞÜKRÜ GÜRBÜZ, ALİ GÜR

The views of nurses working at palliative care centers about palliative care and the influence of education on their knowledge level

METİN DİNÇER, NAZAN TORUN

A comment on “General anesthesia management in carotid endarterectomy surgery: a single center experience”

Ali Sait KAVAKLİ

Surgical approach to retinal detachment with primary congenital glaucoma

Ali OLGUN, DİLEK GÜVEN, Eyüp DÜZGÜN, Selam Yekta ŞENDÜL, Hakan KAÇAR

Idiopathic talipes equinovarus with preaxial polydactyly of the foot: a case report

Ali Tufan PEHLİVAN, Süleyman Semih DEDEOĞLU, Yunus İMREN

Antimicrobial activity and antioxidant potential of the methanolic leaf extracts of three cultivars of date palm trees (Phoenix dactylifera) from Saudi Arabia

Emad Mohamed ABDALLAH, Khalid Hamid MUSA, Kamal Ahmad QURESHİ, Alaa M M SADEEK

The frequency of de quervain tenosynovitis, trigger finger and dupuytren contracture accompanying idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome

Fatih DUYGUN, Cengiz ALDEMİR

Beneficial effects of melatonin on acetylsalicylic acid induced liver damage in rats

M Ediz SARIHAN, Hakan PARLAKPINAR, Alaattin POLAT, Nigar VARDI, ONURAL ÖZHAN, HACI AHMET ACET