Clinical and morphological evaluation of odontoid fractures of C2 vertebra

There have not been enough studies on cervical vertebra-2 (C2) odontoid fracture and their clinical and radiological evaluation. This study was designed to determine the proportions of the C2 odontoid fracture types and to determine the specific incidence of fracture types according to age and gender and to evaluate them clinically and with cervical spine computed tomography (CT) sections of each case. We retrospectively reviewed 32 cases of C2 odontoid fractures admitted to our clinic between January 2013 and March 2017. There were C2 odontoid fracture [15 (46.9%) male and 17 (53.1%) female] who were referred to the neurosurgical clinic. The mean age was 38.5 (2-87). The most frequent reasons for application were in-vehicle traffic accidents 18 (56.3%), fall 6 (18.8%), outside-vehicle traffic accidents 4 (12.5%), assault 3 (9.4%), breast Ca. 1 (3.1%) due to metastasis. In terms of odontoid fracture types; Type I 4 (12.5%), Type II 23 (71.9%), Type III was 5 (15.6%). 13 (40.6%) anterior, 7 (21.9%) posterior and 12 (37.5%) nondeplase were applied for odontoid fracture displacement in our cases. Pain and tenderness in the neck region of 29 patients (90.6%) were present in C2 odontoid fractured patients who applied to our clinic, while 3 (9.4%) patients presented with hemiparesia. The Frankel scale of these patients; 1 patient (3.1%) applied with B, 2 (6.3%) with D, 29 (90.6%) with E scale. Odontoid fractures do not always come to us with spinal cord damage, often the initial sign may be only neck pain. In such cases, odontoid fractures can be easily misdiagnosed and can result in morbidity and mortality, which is a major problem. The aim of our study is to draw attention to the importance of this issue by evaluating the existing data on odontoid fractures in many aspects, which are not enough studies in the literature.

___

1. Ivancic PC. Odontoid fracture biomechanics. Spine 2014;39:1403-10.

2. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1663–74.

3. Grauer JN, Shafi B, Hilibrand AS, et al. Proposal of a modified, treatmentoriented classifi cation of odontoid fractures. Spine J. 2005;5:123–9.

4. Muller EJ, Wick M, Russe O, et al. Management of odontoid fractures in the elderly. Eur Spine J. 1999;8:360–5.

5. Crockard HA, Heilman AE, Stevens JM. Progressive myelopathy secondary to odontoid fractures: Clinical, radiological, and surgical features. J Neurosurg. 1993;78:579–86.

6. Malik SA, Murphy M, Connolly P, et al. Evaluation of morbidity, mortality and outcome following cervical spine injuries in elderly patients. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:585–91.

7. Brown RL, Brunn MA, Garcia VF. Cervical spine injuries in children: a review of 103 patients treated consecutively at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:1107–14.

8. Fassett DR, McCall T, Brockmeyer DL. Odontoid synchondrosis fractures in children. Neurosurg Focus. 2006;20:7.

9. Bu G, Shuang F, Liu G, et al. Type II Odontoid Fracture with Atlantoaxial Dislocation Presenting as Symptomatic Seizures: A Case Report. World Neurosurg. 2016;96:614.11-14.

10. Frankel H, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 1969;7:179–92.

11. Senturk S. Radiological determination of safe and adequate corpectomy limits in the cervical region. Ann Med Res. 2019;26:854-8.

12. Cevirgen F, Karaca L, Senol D, et al. Analysis in terms of gender of morphometric characteristics of typical cervical vertebrae: A radiological study. Med Sci. 2018;7:355-9.

13. Redlund-Johnell I, Pettersson H. Radiographic measurements of the craniovertebral region. Designed for evaluation of abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Radiol Diagn. 1984;25:23–8.

14. Jubert P, Lonjon G, Garreau LC. Complications of upper cervical spine trauma in elderly subjects. A systematic review of the literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:301–12.

15. Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Odontoid fracture in motor vehicle environments. Accid Anal Prev. 2005;37:505–14.

16. Plant G. Spinal meningioma presenting as focal epilepsy. Br Med J. 1981;282:1974–5.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Linezolid drug interactions: A retrospective study

Zeynep Ülkü GÜN, Ömer Faruk BAHÇECİOĞLU, Selim GÖK

Following-up the long-term efficacy of hepatitis B vaccine in immunization of risky occupational groups

Meside GÜNDÜZÖZ, Murat BÜYÜKŞEKERCİ, Osman Gökhan ÖZAKINCI, Aybike DİP, Servet Birgin İRİTAŞ, Berrin TELATAR

Effects of hyoscine-n-butylbromide on postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative pain in ureteroscopic procedures

Süheyla ABİTAĞAOĞLU, Ceren KÖKSAL, Cansu OFLUOĞLU, Çağlar YILDIRIM, Dilek ERDOĞAN ARI

Pneumothorax in the newborn due to oxygen therapy through the intubation tube; A case report

Murat KURU, Fatma DURAK, Selda YAVAŞCAN

Comparison of the antioxidant effect and phenolic profile of two Crataegus extracts

Hilal BARDAKÇI, Kevser ÖZDEMİR, Timur Hakan BARAK, Elif Begüm YILDIRIM, Feyza Şebnem GÖRÜR

The association of outer retinal tubulation with vitreomacular adhesion and epiretinal membrane in eyes with age-related macular degeneration

Seyhan DİKCİ, Pamuk Betül ULUCAN, Soner DEMİREL, Penpe Gül FIRAT, Turgut YILMAZ

Evaluation of potential drug-drug interactions in hospitalized patients at a tertiary care hospital: A pilot study

Yeşim KAYA YAŞAR, Seçkin ENGİN, Elif Nur BARUT, Serhat SEVGİ, Gamze EROĞLU, Feride Sena SEZEN

Mobile phone usage characteristics of children at school and parents' approach

Murat ÇEVİK, İzzet GÖKER KÜÇÜK, Kurtuluş ÖNGEL, Utku ESER

The effect of orlistat treatment on cardiovascular novel inflammatory biomarkers

Zafer YALİM, Sümeyra ALAN YALİM

Employing Adaptt Tool to respond to the rising COVID-19 caseload in the European region

Saurabh RamBihariLal SHRİVASTAVA, Prateek Saurabh SHRİVASTAVA