Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of some hematological parameters on fertilization success, embryo quality and pregnancy rates in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. 50 infertile couples aged 22-46 years who were admitted to Ataturk University Research Hospital for IVF treatment were included in the study. The number of fertilized oocytes, embryo quality, clinic pregnancy rate were determineted and compared with hematological parameters. In the male petients, the platelet distribution width (PDW) value was negatively correlated with the fertilization rate (rp = -0.341*; p=0.015). An negative relationship between the transplantable embryo rate and the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) value was observed (rp = -0.320*; p = 0.024) in the male. While the hemoglobin (HGB) value was negatively correlated with the fertilization rate (rp=-0.332*; p=0.019), the red cell distribution width (RDW) value was positively correlated with the fertilization rate (rp = 0.359*; p=0.010) in female petients. In addition, significant correlations were found between PDW value both good quality embryo rate (regression coefficient : -19.808, p = 0.007) ( corrected as -19.808) and transplantable embryo rate (regression coefficient : -16.855, p = 0.033) (corrected as -16.855) in female petients. In conclusion, changes in PDW values of female patients significantly affect embryo quality, may result pregnancy failure and abnormal embryo and fetus development during pregnancy

___

1. Cyna AM, Middleton P. Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;8:CD003005.

2. Prabhakaran S, Ljuhar D, Coleman R, et al. Circumcision in the paediatric patient: Areview of indications, technique and complications. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54:1299-307.

3. Sir E, Eksert S, Zor M, et al. The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided unilateral transversus abdominis plane block in the pain management of shock wave lithotripsy. Arch Esp Urol. 2019;72:933-8.

4. Demiraran Y, Kocaman B, Akman RY. A Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single dose epidural tramadol versus morphine in Children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:510-3.

5. Brenner L, Marhofer P, Kettner SC, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cranial spread during caudal blockade in children: The effect of different volumes of local anesthetics. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:229-35.

6. Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK. Handbook of Clinical Anesthesia. 6th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2009.

7. Uguralp S, Mutus M, Koroglu A, et al. Regional anesthesia is a good alternative to general anesthesia in pediatric surgery: Experience in 1,554 children. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:610-3.

8. Şener M, Çalışkan E, Bozdoğan N, et al. Our experiences of paediatric caudal anaesthesia. JARSS. 2006;14:259-63.

9. Gezer E, Uğur B, Şen S, et al. Retrospective evaluation of caudal anaesthesia in pediatric surgery. Meandros Med Dent J. 2006;7:27-30.

10. Erdoğan NM, Kaymak S, Uğuz M, et al. Evaluation of analgesic effect of caudal anesthesia: A retrospective study. J Contemp Med. 2015;5:41-5.

11. Beyaz SG. Comparison of postoperative analgesic efficacy of caudal block versus dorsal penile nerve block with levobupivacaine for circumcision in children. Korean J Pain. 2011;24:31-5.

12. Irwin MG. Cheng W. Comparison of subcutaneous ring block of the penis with caudal epidural block for post-circumcision analgesia in children. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996;24:365-7.

13. Weksler N, Atias I, Klein M, et al. Is penile block better than caudal epidural block for postcircumcision analgesia? J Anesth. 2005;19:36-9.

14. Bramwell RG, Bullen C, Radford P. Caudal block for postoperative analgesia in children. Anaesthesia. 1982;37:1024-8.

15. Walco GA, Cassidy RC, Schechter NL. Pain, hurt and harm. The ethics of pain control in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:541-4.

16. Stang HJ, Snellman LW, Condon LM, et al. Beyond dorsal penile nerve block: a more humane circumcision. Pediatrics. 1997;100:E3.

17. Yeoman PM, Cooke R, Hain WR. Penile block for circumcision? A comparison with caudal blockade. Anaesthesia. 1983;38:862-6.

18. Kazak Bengisun Z, Ekmekci P, Haliloglu AH. Levobupivacaine for postoperative pain management in circumcision: caudal blocks or dorsal penile nerve block. Agri. 2012;24:180-6.

19. Locatelli B, Ingelmo P, Sonzogni V, et al. Randomized, double-blind, phase ııı, controlled trial comparing levobupivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% by the caudal route in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:366-71.

20. Dobereiner EF, Cox RG, Ewen A, et al. Evidence-based clinical update: which local anesthetic drug for pediatric caudal block provides optimal efficacy with the fewest side effects? Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:1102-10.

21. Silvani P, Camporesi A, Agostino MR, et al. Caudal anesthesia in pediatrics: An update. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006;72:453-9.

22. Jöhr M, Berger TM. Caudal blocks. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22:44-50.

23. Brown DL. Regional Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2nd edition. WB Saunders Company, Pennsylvania, 1996.

24. Akın M, Saydam S, Keskin G, et al. Caudal epidural anesthesia in pediatric urological surgery; a single institutional experience with 5536 cases. Bozok Med J. 2015;5:41-5.

25. Begeç Z, Durmuş M, Toprak Hİ, et al. Caudal block in children: A retrospective study of 2262 cases. JTAICS. 2005;33:288-94.

26. Ango PD, Kohou KL, Koné N, et al. Caudal anesthesia: experience in the post-operative analgesia in pediatric ambulatory surgery at the University Hospital of Treichville. Open Journal of Anesthesiology. 2017;7:400-6.

27. Ivani G, De Negri P, Lonngvist PA, et al. A comparison of three different concentrations of levobupivacaine for caudal block in children. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:368-71.

28. Ramboatiana R, Gassner C, Schoch JP, et al. [Postoperative analgesia for circumcision in children]. Agressologie. 1990;31:39-42.

29. Polat R, Akın M, Keskin G, et al. Comparison of dorsal penile block and caudal block with bupivacaine and oral ibuprofen in children undergoing circumcision. J Anesth. 2015;23:238-43.

30. Irsi C, Ar Yıldırım A, Ozdemir F. Caudal block with general anesthesia for outpatient pediatric surgery procedures. J Anesth Crit Care Open Access. 2017;7:00248.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

An examination of forensic autopsy cases with pulmonary embolism

Ahmet Sedat DÜNDAR, Mücahit ORUÇ, İsmail ALTIN, Bedirhan Sezer ÖNER, Semih PETEKKAYA, Emine TÜRKMEN ŞAMDANCI, Osman CELBİŞ

Prognostic importance of the outcomes of updating staging system in patients with stage II breast cancer

Hasan DAĞMURA, Yusuf Alper KILIÇ

Synthesis of the compound 4-Coumarinyl 4-methoxybenzoate and molecular docking study against COVID-19

Pelin KOPARIR

Investigation of dentist and clinical environment preferences for children patients and parents

Esra KIZILCI, İsmail CİHANGİR, Özlem AŞKAROĞLU, Hüsniye GÜMÜŞ

Evaluation of the psychiatric examination findings of victims decided to have sexual abuse occurred as a result of trial

Ferhan KANDEMİR, Bora BÜKEN, Zehra Zerrin ERKOL, Erkan BÜKEN

Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes

Ayşe Nur YILDIRIM, Osman Nuri KELEŞ

Analysis of the job satisfaction and burnout levels of operating room nurses

Bilsev DEMİR

Evaluation of risk factors of diagnostic failure in fine needle biopsy in pulmonary nodules; conventional computed tomography versus computed tomography flouroscopy

Mehmet KOLU, İsmail Okan YILDIRIM

Apelin hormone level and its role in the etiology of sudden hearing loss

Nuray ENSARİ, Özer Erdem GÜR, Nilgün GÜR, Ömer Tarık SELÇUK, Levent RENDA, M. Deniz YILMAZ, Hülya EYİGÖR, Yeşim ÇEKİN

Efficacy of proximal crescentic, supination osteotomy in the surgical treatment of moderate and severe hallux valgus deformity

Vugar NABI, Cengiz ALDEMİR