Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of some hematological parameters on fertilization success, embryo quality and pregnancy rates in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. 50 infertile couples aged 22-46 years who were admitted to Ataturk University Research Hospital for IVF treatment were included in the study. The number of fertilized oocytes, embryo quality, clinic pregnancy rate were determineted and compared with hematological parameters. In the male petients, the platelet distribution width (PDW) value was negatively correlated with the fertilization rate (rp = -0.341*; p=0.015). An negative relationship between the transplantable embryo rate and the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) value was observed (rp = -0.320*; p = 0.024) in the male. While the hemoglobin (HGB) value was negatively correlated with the fertilization rate (rp=-0.332*; p=0.019), the red cell distribution width (RDW) value was positively correlated with the fertilization rate (rp = 0.359*; p=0.010) in female petients. In addition, significant correlations were found between PDW value both good quality embryo rate (regression coefficient : -19.808, p = 0.007) ( corrected as -19.808) and transplantable embryo rate (regression coefficient : -16.855, p = 0.033) (corrected as -16.855) in female petients. In conclusion, changes in PDW values of female patients significantly affect embryo quality, may result pregnancy failure and abnormal embryo and fetus development during pregnancy

___

1. Cyna AM, Middleton P. Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;8:CD003005.

2. Prabhakaran S, Ljuhar D, Coleman R, et al. Circumcision in the paediatric patient: Areview of indications, technique and complications. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54:1299-307.

3. Sir E, Eksert S, Zor M, et al. The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided unilateral transversus abdominis plane block in the pain management of shock wave lithotripsy. Arch Esp Urol. 2019;72:933-8.

4. Demiraran Y, Kocaman B, Akman RY. A Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single dose epidural tramadol versus morphine in Children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:510-3.

5. Brenner L, Marhofer P, Kettner SC, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cranial spread during caudal blockade in children: The effect of different volumes of local anesthetics. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:229-35.

6. Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK. Handbook of Clinical Anesthesia. 6th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2009.

7. Uguralp S, Mutus M, Koroglu A, et al. Regional anesthesia is a good alternative to general anesthesia in pediatric surgery: Experience in 1,554 children. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:610-3.

8. Şener M, Çalışkan E, Bozdoğan N, et al. Our experiences of paediatric caudal anaesthesia. JARSS. 2006;14:259-63.

9. Gezer E, Uğur B, Şen S, et al. Retrospective evaluation of caudal anaesthesia in pediatric surgery. Meandros Med Dent J. 2006;7:27-30.

10. Erdoğan NM, Kaymak S, Uğuz M, et al. Evaluation of analgesic effect of caudal anesthesia: A retrospective study. J Contemp Med. 2015;5:41-5.

11. Beyaz SG. Comparison of postoperative analgesic efficacy of caudal block versus dorsal penile nerve block with levobupivacaine for circumcision in children. Korean J Pain. 2011;24:31-5.

12. Irwin MG. Cheng W. Comparison of subcutaneous ring block of the penis with caudal epidural block for post-circumcision analgesia in children. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996;24:365-7.

13. Weksler N, Atias I, Klein M, et al. Is penile block better than caudal epidural block for postcircumcision analgesia? J Anesth. 2005;19:36-9.

14. Bramwell RG, Bullen C, Radford P. Caudal block for postoperative analgesia in children. Anaesthesia. 1982;37:1024-8.

15. Walco GA, Cassidy RC, Schechter NL. Pain, hurt and harm. The ethics of pain control in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:541-4.

16. Stang HJ, Snellman LW, Condon LM, et al. Beyond dorsal penile nerve block: a more humane circumcision. Pediatrics. 1997;100:E3.

17. Yeoman PM, Cooke R, Hain WR. Penile block for circumcision? A comparison with caudal blockade. Anaesthesia. 1983;38:862-6.

18. Kazak Bengisun Z, Ekmekci P, Haliloglu AH. Levobupivacaine for postoperative pain management in circumcision: caudal blocks or dorsal penile nerve block. Agri. 2012;24:180-6.

19. Locatelli B, Ingelmo P, Sonzogni V, et al. Randomized, double-blind, phase ııı, controlled trial comparing levobupivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% by the caudal route in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:366-71.

20. Dobereiner EF, Cox RG, Ewen A, et al. Evidence-based clinical update: which local anesthetic drug for pediatric caudal block provides optimal efficacy with the fewest side effects? Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:1102-10.

21. Silvani P, Camporesi A, Agostino MR, et al. Caudal anesthesia in pediatrics: An update. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006;72:453-9.

22. Jöhr M, Berger TM. Caudal blocks. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22:44-50.

23. Brown DL. Regional Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2nd edition. WB Saunders Company, Pennsylvania, 1996.

24. Akın M, Saydam S, Keskin G, et al. Caudal epidural anesthesia in pediatric urological surgery; a single institutional experience with 5536 cases. Bozok Med J. 2015;5:41-5.

25. Begeç Z, Durmuş M, Toprak Hİ, et al. Caudal block in children: A retrospective study of 2262 cases. JTAICS. 2005;33:288-94.

26. Ango PD, Kohou KL, Koné N, et al. Caudal anesthesia: experience in the post-operative analgesia in pediatric ambulatory surgery at the University Hospital of Treichville. Open Journal of Anesthesiology. 2017;7:400-6.

27. Ivani G, De Negri P, Lonngvist PA, et al. A comparison of three different concentrations of levobupivacaine for caudal block in children. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:368-71.

28. Ramboatiana R, Gassner C, Schoch JP, et al. [Postoperative analgesia for circumcision in children]. Agressologie. 1990;31:39-42.

29. Polat R, Akın M, Keskin G, et al. Comparison of dorsal penile block and caudal block with bupivacaine and oral ibuprofen in children undergoing circumcision. J Anesth. 2015;23:238-43.

30. Irsi C, Ar Yıldırım A, Ozdemir F. Caudal block with general anesthesia for outpatient pediatric surgery procedures. J Anesth Crit Care Open Access. 2017;7:00248.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

A case with unexplained weight loss the underlying cause is aluminum toxicity

Emir CERME, Selcan SEVEN, Ece VURAL, Selda MERCAN, Işıl BAVUNOĞLU

Pseudo-Outbreak of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolated from Kidney Stones and Attributed to Inadequate Sterilization: Investigation of Molecular Typing and Clonal Relationship

Reyhan YİŞ, Selma TOSUN, Emine Deniz BAYRAM, Özlem Gamze GÜLFİDAN, Tansu DEĞİRMENCİ, Bülent GÜNLÜSOY, Barış OTLU, Çiğdem KUZUCU

Comparison of adult health literacy of individuals related to two family health centers with high and low socio-economic level

Suzan HAVLIOĞLU, Fatma ERSİN

Can ultrasound probes and gels be the source for opportunistic bacterial infections?

Özlem GENÇ, Sermin UMAY

Open wedge high tibial osteotomy with sliding cancellous bone in distal fragment into the osteotomy gap; 2-year follow-up results

Aydın ARSLAN, Reşit SEVİMLİ

Relationship between behçet’s disease and oxidant and antioxidant markers

Fikret AKYÜREK, Fatma TUNÇEZ AKYÜREK

Smoking behavior and attitudes of patient’s relatives in the pediatric emergency rooms- a multi-center study

Selçuk Yasin YILDIZ, Onur ÖZTÜRK, Muhammet BULUT, Arzu AYRALER, Muhammet Ali ORUÇ, Bahadır YAZICIOĞLU, Mustafa ÜNAL, Gülşah ÖZTÜRK, Mi̇kai̇l ÖZDEMİR

Evaluation of factors influencing quality of life in the third trimester of pregnancy: A cross-sectional study

Selda YÖRÜK, Hülya TÜRKMEN

Evaluation of single low-dose caudal epidural block effectiveness in children undergoing circumcision surgery: Single center experience

Volkan Serhat ÖZEN

Characteristics of the immigrant newborns and analysis of short-term results: An example of Giresun

Muhammet BULUT, Dilek KÜÇÜK ALEMDAR