aşlı Erişkin Dönemdeki Bireylerin Yüz Yumuşak Doku Özelliklerinin Cinsiyetlere Göre Karşılaştırılması: Pilot Çalışma

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 3B yüz tarama sisteminden elde edilen görüntüleri kullanarak 50-60 yaş arası bireylerin yüz yumuşak doku boyutlarını değerlendirmek ve cinsiyetler arası karşılaştırma yapmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya protetik diş tedavisi anabilim dalında oklüzal dikey boyut ve ön diş kaybı olmayan 26 kişi (13 erkek; 55,54±2,99 yıl, 13 kadın; 54,46±3,31 yıl) dahil edildi. 3dMD görüntüleri üzerinde lineer ve açısal ölçümler yapıldı. Gruplar arası değerleri karşılaştırmak için bağımsız örneklem t testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Veriler dudak uzunluğu, alt yüz yüksekliği, burun genişliği, alt yüz genişliği, alt dudak ve burun açısında cinsiyetler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değişiklikler olduğunu ortaya koydu. Sonuç: Kadınlarda fasiyal yumuşak doku genişlikleri ve yükseklikleri erkeklere göre daha azdır.

Comparison of Facial Soft Tissue Features of Older Adults by Gender: A Pilot Study

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the facial soft tissues dimensions of the individuals 50-60 ages and compare between sexes by using images obtained from 3D facial scanning system. Materials and Methods: Twenty six individuals (13 males; 55.54±2.99 years, 13 females; 54.46±3.31 years) with no loss of occlusal vertical dimensions and anterior teeth in department of prosthodontics were included in the study. Linear and angular measurements of anatomical marks on 3dMD images were made. Statistical analyse (Independent samples t-test) was performed to compare the differences. Results: There were statistically significant differences in lip length, lower face height, nose width, lower face width, lower lip and nasomental angle were found between sexes. Conclusion: Facial soft tissue widths and heights were less in female than male.

PDF

___

1. Albert AM, Ricane K, Patterson E. A review of the literature on the aging adult skull and face: implications for forensic science research and applications. Forensic Sci Int 2007; 172: 1-9.
2. Rhodes MG. Age estimation of faces: a review. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2009; 23: 1-12.
3. Ozdemir ST, Sigirli D, Ercan I, Cankur NS. Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of healthy Turkish young adults: anthropometric measurements. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33: 175-84.
4. Velemínská J, Fleischmannová N, Suchá B, Dupej J, Bejdová Š, Kotěrová A, et al. Age-related differences in cranial sexual dimorphism in contemporary Europe. Int J Legal Med 2021; 135: 2033-44
5. Dickens ST, Sarver DM, Proffit WR. Changes in frontal soft tissue dimensions of the lower face by age and gender. World Journal of Orthodontics 2002; 3: 313-20.
6. Maal TJJ, van Loon B, Plooij JM, Rangel F, Ettema AM, Borstlap WA, et al. Registration of 3-dimensional facial photographs for clinical use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 2391-401.
7. Topsakal KG. 3-Dimensional imaging systems in orthodontics: Review of literature. Selcuk Dent J 2018; 5: 186-93.
8. Available from: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/ Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Yaslilar-2020-37227
9. De Greef S, Vandermeulen D, Claes P, Suetens P, Willems G. The influence of sex, age and body mass index on facial soft tissue depths. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2009; 5: 60-5.
10. Stephan CN, Simpson EK. Facial soft tissue depths in craniofacial identification (part I): an analytical review of the published adult data. J Forensic Sci 2008; 53; 1257-72.
11. Baik HS, Jeon JM, Lee HJ. Facial soft-tissue analysis of Korean adults with normal occlusion using a 3-dimensional laser scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 759-66.
12. Plooij JM, Swennen GR, Rangel FA, Maal TJ, Schutyser FA, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft-tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38: 267-73.
13. Powers SK, Howley ET. Exercise physiology: Theory and application to fitness and performance. 3th Ed. Boston: McGraw- Hill, 1996.
14. Zhao JM, Ji LL, Han MQ, Mou QN, Chu G, Chen T, et al. Lip morphology estimation models based on three-dimensional images in a modern adult population from China. Int J Legal Med 2021; 135: 1887-901.
15. Smith OAM, Nashed YSG, Duncan C, Pears N, Profico A, O'Higgins P. 3D Modeling of craniofacial ontogeny and sexual dimorphism in children. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2021; 304: 1918-26.
16. Liu Y, Kau CH, Pan F, Zhou H, Zhang Q, Zacharopoulos GV. A 3-dimensional anthropometric evaluation of facial morphology among Chinese and Greek population. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24: e353-8.
17. Kaur M, Garg RK, Singla S. Analysis of facial soft tissue changes with aging and their effects on facial morphology: A forensic perspective. Egypt J Forensic Sci 2015; 5: 46-56.
18. Wilkinson C. Forensic facial reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
19. Nilendu D. Mid-sagittal Facial Soft Tissue Depth and Angular Facial Height–A Comprehensive Study. Forensic Imaging 2020; 20: 200355.
20. Hernández EL, Alvarez A, Abou-Ayash S, Att W. Effect of Complete Dentures on Facial Soft Tissue Volume: A 3D Comparative Study. Int J Prosthodont 2021; 35: 208-18.
21. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Ciusa V, Dellavia C. Growth and aging of facial soft tissues: A computerized three-dimensional mesh diagram analysis. Clin Anat 2003; 16: 420-33.
22. Cheung LK, Chan YM, Jayaratne YS, Lo J. Three-dimensional cephalometric norms of Chinese adults in Hong Kong with balanced facial profile. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112: e56-e73.
23. Packiriswamy V, Kumar P, Rao M. Identification of facial shape by applying golden ratio to the facial measurements: an interracial study in malaysian population. N Am J Med Sci 2012; 4: 624-9.
24. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR, Alt KW, Bagic I, Baltadjiev G, et al. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16: 615-46.
25. Bravo-Hammett S, Nucci L, Christou T, Aristizabal JF, Kau CH. 3D Analysis of Facial Morphology of a Colombian Population Compared to Adult Caucasians. Eur J Dent 2020; 14: 342-51.