Smith’te Tutarlılık Tartışması Bağlamında Görünmez El Metaforu ve Kendiliğinden Doğan Düzenin İktisat ve Toplum Açısından Önemi

This study, deals with the emergence of political economy along with the production of goods andservices depending on the capital accumulation process. The Smithian impact in resolving the linkbetween the definition of political economy and distribution and accumulation shall be explained.Moreover, the view that Smith’s works titled The Theory of Moral Sentiments and The Wealth of theNations contain consistency rather than inconsistency are evaluated in the study. Smith deals with themarket and political process in his work titled The Wealth of the Nations. Therefore, it is expressedthat the bases of political economy have been established by his work. Moreover, Smith evaluates themoral philosophy in his work titled The Theory of Moral Sentiments which focuses on the importanceof concepts like utility and ethics. Accordingly, that the thinkers of Scottish Enlightenment focuson emotions instead of mind and then Smith’s tendency towards emotional rationality realized inconsistency are expressed and that these thinkers are turning towards the concept of sympathy isemphasized in this study. Smith, one of the thinkers of Scottish Enlightenment, attempted to describethe desire of people to be accepted, adopted and esteemed in society by the concept of sympathy.Furthermore, Smith mentions that there is a relationship between the concept of sympathy and ethicalvalues. In this context, this study explains the assessment of the concept of sympathy from a socialand ethical point of view by the thinkers of Scottish Enlightenment. In addition, it is argued that theidea of spontaneous order and the invisible hand metaphor in Smith have integrity with Smith’s MoralSentiments Theory. Smith, with the idea of spontaneous order, claims that individuals are pursuingtheir self-interest in the commercial society, as a result, a collective development can be achieved bythis way. In the spontaneous order, there are cooperations and exchanges in the market among people.On the other hand, Smith expresses that public good will reach the highest level with the invisiblehand metaphor. Besides, the invisible hand metaphor is an instrument which balance both marketand society that has the function of regulatory force. This study, discusses the importance of Smith’sinvisible hand metaphor and spontaneous order for economy and society. In the study, it is emphasizedon the argument that Smith’s invisible hand metaphor can be explained with work titled The MoralSentiments Theory. Nevertheless, it is evaluated that the principle of sympathy in The Moral SentimentsTheory is referred to the sense of competition in The Wealth of the Nations and the economic life of thebuyer and the seller is realized in a consistent way. In this context, the purpose of the study is to revealand discuss whether Smith’s invisible hand metaphor and the idea of spontaneous order and also hisideas on economics, society and morality in general are linked to each other or not. As a consequenceof the study, it is stated that Smith had tendency toward the ideal of integrating economics and moralbehavior in The Theory of Moral Sentiments and The Wealth of the Nations. Moreover, in general, thatthe Scottish Enlightenment thinkers referred to moral values rather than to the self-interested reasonand the discipline of the political economy has developed with Smith is manifested.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Ekonomi Politik, Görünmez El Metaforu, Kendiliğinden Doğan Düzen, Ahlaki Duygular Kuramı, Ulusların Zenginliği.

PDF

___

Altan, Mehmet (2013) Uluslararası Ekonomi Politik, (Ed.) Murat Çetin, Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını No. 2941, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayıncılığı.
Başdemir, Hasan Y. (2009) Liberalizm Ahlaki Temeller, Ankara: Liberte Yayınları.
Brewer, Anthony (2009) “On the Other (Invisible) Hand…”, History of Political Economy, 41(3), 519-543.
Buğra, Ayşe (1995) “İktisatçılar ve İnsanlar”, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Campbell, Thomas D. (1971) Adam Smith’s Science of Morals, University of Glasgow Social and Economic Studies, New Series, No. 21, London: Allen & Unwin.
Fiztgibbons, Athol (1995) Adam Smith’s System of Liberty, Wealth and Virtue, New York: Clarendon.
Furuya, Hiroyuki (2011) “Beauty as Independence: Stoic Philosophy and Adam Smith”, The Kyoto Economic Review, 80 (1), 70-102.
Gordon, Scott (1991) The History and Philosophy of Social Science, New York: Routledge.
Golding, Peter ve Murdock, Graham (1997) “Kültür, İletişim ve Ekonomi Politik”, içinde (Ed.) Süleyman İrvan, Medya, Kültür ve Siyaset, (Çev.) Dilek B. Kejanlıoğlu, Ankara: Ark Yayınları.
Horwitz, Steven (2013) “Smith’ten Menger ve Hayek’e Kendiliğinden Doğan Düzen Geleneğinde Liberalizm”, (Ed.) Atilla Yayla, içinde Hangi Liberalizm, (Çev.) Atilla Yayla, Ankara: Liberte Yayınları, 161-190.
Hjort, Anne M. (1991) “Mandeville’s Ambivalent Modernity”, Comparative Literature, 106 (5), 951-966.
Kılıçaslan, Yılmaz (2012) “Temel Kavramlar ve Tüketici Davranışı” (Ed.) Yılmaz Kılıçaslan ve Ethem Esen içinde İktisada Giriş, Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını No: 2566, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2-26.
Kisner, Matthew J. (2010) “Perfection and Desire: Spinoza on The Good”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91(1), 97–117.
Kniivilä, Matleena (2007) “Industrial development and economic growth: implications for poverty reduction and income inequality” in Industrial Development for the 21st Century: Sustainable Development Perspectives, New York: United Nations Publication, 295-332.
Lord, Beth (2010) Spinoza’s Ethics- An Edinburgh Philosophical Guide, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Macfie, Alec L. (1967) The Individual in Society: Papers on Adam Smith, London: Allen & Unwin.
Mandeville, Bernard (1988) The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, Vol. 1-2, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Mill, John S. (2009) Principles of Political Economy, Abridged, with Critical, Bibliographical, and Explanatory Notes, and a Sketch of the History of Political Economy, By J. Laurence Laughlin, Ph. D. Assistant Professor of Political Economy in Harvard University, 1885, The Project Gutenberg EBook, Release Date: September 27, 2009.
Otteson, James R. (2002) “Adam Smith: Bir Ahlâk Filozofu”, (Çev.) Atilla Yayla, Piyasa Dergisi, 3 (Yaz), 49- 57.
Özekicioğlu, Halil ve Kılıç, Cüneyt (2010) Invisible Hand as the Base of Capitalism and İt’s Evolution in Relation to Globalization: Materialistic Revival”, içinde (Ed.) Hakan Kapucu, Murat Aydın, İsmail Şiriner, Farhang Morady, Ümit Çetin, Politik İktisat ve Adam Smith, Kocaeli: IJOPEC Yayınları, 197- 208.
Özel, Hüseyin (2009) “İktisat ve Sosyal Teoride ‘Görünmez El’ Eğretilemesi”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 42 (2), (Haziran), 45-65.
Özel, Hüseyin (2012) “Ekonomi Politiğin Yöntemi ve Kapsamı”, İktisat Felsefesi Dergisi, 1 (Bahar), 12-42.
Özveren, Eyüp (2011) “(Kurumsal) İktisat-Felsefe İlişkisi: Ne Seninle ne Sensiz?” içinde (Ed.) Ozan İşler ve Feridun Yılmaz, İktisadı Felsefeyle Düşünmek, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Pennington, Mark (2014) Sağlam Politik Ekonomi-Klasik Liberalizm ve Kamu Politikasının Geleceği, (Çev.) Atilla Yayla, Ankara: Liberte Yayınları.
Polanyi, Karl (2001) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Second Edition, Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press.
Pongiglione, Francesca (2011) “Bernard Mandeville’s influence on Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations”, I Castelli di Yale, XI (11), 109-118.
Raphael, David D. (2014) Adam Smith, (Çev.) Ekrem Erdem ve A. Aslıhan Çelenk, Ankara: Liberte Yayınları. Ruben, Ester ve Dumludağ, Devrim (2015) “Davranışsal İktisadın Gelişimi”, İktisat ve Toplum Dergisi, 58 (Ağustos), 4-9.
Sarfati, Metin (2007) “Smith’te Bütünlük Sorunu”, İktisat Dergisi, 490 (Ekim-Kasım), 32-47.
Sarfati, Metin (2010) “Ekonomi Politiğin İnsanı” “Kim”dir?, İstanbul: Derin Yayınları.
Sarfati, Metin (2011) “Smith–Spinoza ve İktisat Teorisine Bir Eleştirisi”, içinde (Ed.) Ercan Eren ve Metin Sarfati, İktisatta Yeni Yaklaşımlar, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 105-134.
Sarfati, Metin (2014) “İktisadın Gizemi İktisadın Geleceği”, Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6 (2), 1-14.
Scott, Kyle (2009) “Mandeville’s Paradox as Satire: The Moral Consequences of Being a Good Citizen in a Commercial Society”, Politics & Policy, 37 (2), 369-394.
Smith, Adam (2008) Milletlerin Zenginliği, (Çev.) Haldun Derin, İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
Smith, Adam (1976) The Theory of Moral Sentiments, (Ed.) D.D. Raphael and A.L. Macfie, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Smith, Steven B. (2005) “What Kind of Democrat Was Spinoza?”, Political Theory, 33 (1), 6-27.
Uyl, Douglas ve Griswold, Charles (1996) “Adam Smith on Friendship and Love”, The Review of Metaphysics, 49 (3), 609-637.
Üşür, İşaya (2003) “Ekonomi Politik: Zarif Mezar Taşları?”, Praksis Dergisi, 10 (Yaz-Güz), 211-238.
Vanberg, Viktor J. (2002) “Anayasal İktisat, Ahlak ve Ekonomik Düzen Politikası”, içinde (Ed.) Coşkun Can Aktan, Anayasal İktisat, (Çev.) Melek Seferoğlu, Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi, 247-268.
Verburg, Rudi (2015) “Bernard Mandeville’s vision of the social utility of pride and greed”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(4), 662-691.
Wagener, Hans J. (1994) “Cupiditate et Potentia: The Political Economy of Spinoza” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1(3), 475-493.
Yay, Turan (2010) “Adam Smith’in Düşünce Sisteminde Devletin Rolü ve Önemi Üzerine”, içinde (Ed.) Hakan Kapucu, Murat Aydın, İsmail Şiriner, Farhang Morady, Ümit Çetin, Politik İktisat ve Adam Smith, Kocaeli: IJOPEC Yayınları, 77-91.
Yılmaz, Feridun (2010) “İskoç Aydınlanması ve Adam Smith” içinde (Ed.) Mine Kara, N. Emrah Aydınonat, Görünmez Adam Smith, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 65-85.