Can magnetic resonance spectroscopy adequately differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic and low-grade from high-grade lesions in brain masses?

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı serebral lezyonların ayırıcı tanısında Manyetik Rezonans Spektroskopinin etkinliğini araştırmaktır. Yöntem: Serebral lezyonu olan 46 olgu Manyetik Rezonans Spektroskopi ile incelendi. Kolin, kreatin, N-asetil aspartat ve lipid-laktat pikleri değerlendirildi. Kırk altı olgunun 40'ına stereotaktik biopsi ya da operasyon uygulandı. Histopatolojik sonuçlar ile Manyetik Rezonans Spektroskopi sonuçları karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Lezyonların neoplastik/neoplastik olmayan ayrımında Kolin/N-asetil aspartat en yüksek duyarlılığa sahipti (%87.2) ve Kolin/Kreatin, Kolin/N-asetil aspartat, Kolin+Kreatin/N-asetil aspartat oranlarının özgüllük değerleri %100 olarak hesaplandı. Düşük/yüksek evre ayrımında Kolin/Kreatin en yüksek duyarlılığa sahipti (%95.7) ve Kolin/N-asetil aspartat, Kolin+Kreatin/N-asetil aspartat, lipid-laktat oranlarının özgüllüğü %100 olarak hesaplandı. Sonuç olarak Kolin/Kreatin oranının 2.2'den yüksek olması ve eşlik eden lipid-laktat pikinin neoplastik lezyonların düşük/yüksek evre ayrımında %100 (%82.2-100) duyarlılık ve %100 (%71.7-100) özgüllüğe sahip olduğu görüldü. Sonuç: Yüksek Kolin ve düşük N-asetil aspartat piklerinin lezyonların neoplastik/neoplastik olmayan ayrımında etkili olduğu görüldü. Neoplastik lezyonların yüksek/düşük evre ayrımında ise 2.2'den yüksek Kolin/Kreatin oranı ve eşlik eden lipid-laktat pikinin değerli bilgiler verdiği sonucuna varıldı.

Beyin kitlelerinde neoplastik / neoplastik olmayan ve yüksek evre / düşük evre ayrımında mr spektroskopinin yeri

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in the differential diagnosis of brain lesions. Materials and Methods: Forty-six patients with cerebral lesions were examined by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Choline, creatine, N-acetyl aspartate and lipid-lactate peaks were evaluated. Forty of the 46 patients underwent stereotactic biopsy or surgery. Histopathological results were compared with the Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy results. Results: The Choline / N- acetyl aspartate ratio had the highest sensitivity (87.2%) in neoplastic versus non-neoplastic differentiation and the specificities of the Choline / Creatine, Choline / N-acetyl aspartate and Choline+Creatine / N-acetyl aspartate ratios were found to be 100%. Choline / Creatine ratios showed the highest sensitivity (95.7%) in low-grade versus high-grade differentiation and specificities of Choline / N-acetyl aspartate, Choline+Creatine / N- acetyl aspartate ratios and lipid-lactate levels were found to be 100%. Consequently, a value of Choline / Creatine > 2.2 and an accompanying lipid-lactate peak differentiated neoplasms as low-grade versus high-grade with a sensitivity of 100% (82.2-100) and a specificity of 100% (71.7-100). Conclusion: The presence of elevated Choline and decreased N-acetyl aspartate levels are effective in the differetiation of neoplastic versus non-neoplastic lesions with high sensitivity and specificity. A proposed ratio of Choline / Creatine > 2.2 and an accompanying lipid-lactate peak provide valuable information in differentiating low-grade from high-grade lesions.

___

  • 1) Dowling C, Bollen AW, Noworolski SM, et al. Preoperative proton MR spectroscopic imaging of brain tumors: correlation with histopathologic analysis of resection specimens specimens. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 604–612.
  • 2) Hourani R, Brant LJ, Rizk T, Weingart JD, Barker PB, Horská A. Can proton MR spectroscopic and perfusion imaging differentiate between neoplastic and nonneoplastic brain lesions in adults? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:366-372.
  • 3) Stadlbauer A, Gruber S, Nimsky C, et al. Preoperative grading of gliomas by using metabolite quantification with high-spatial-resolution proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 2006; 238:958-969.
  • 4) Bulakbasi N, Kocaoglu M, Ors F, Tayfun C, Ucoz T. Combination of single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy and apparent diffusion coefficient calculation in the evaluation of common brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24:225-233.
  • 5) Bernstein M, Parrent AG. Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J Neurosurg 1994; 81:165–168.
  • 6) Field M, Witham TF, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD. Comprehensive assessment of hemorrhage risks and outcomes after stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 2001; 94:545–551.
  • 7) Kreth FW, Muacevic A, Medele R, Bise K, Meyer T, Reulen HJ. The risk of haemorrhage after image guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain tumours: a prospective study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 143: 539–545.
  • 8) Sawin PD, Hitchon PW, Follett KA, Torner JC. Computed imaging-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: a risk analysis of 225 consecutive cases. Surg Neurol 1998; 49:640–649.
  • 9) Yu X, Liu Z, Tian Z, Li S, Huang H, et al. Stereotactic biopsy for intracranial space-occupying lesions: clinical analysis of 550 cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2000; 75:103–108.
  • 10) Law M, Yang S, Wang H, et al. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24:1989-1998.
  • 11) Al-Okaili RN, Krejza J, Woo JH, Wolf RL, O'Rourke DM, Judy KD, et al. Intraaxial brain masses: MR imagingbased diagnostic strategy—initial experience. Radiology 2007; 243:539–550.
  • 12) García-Gómez JM, Luts J, Julià-Sapé M, et al. Multiproject-multicenter evaluation of automatic brain tumor classification by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. MAGMA 2009; 22:5-18.
  • 13) Lin AP, Ross BD. Short-echo time proton MR spectroscopy in the presence of gadolinium. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25:705-712.
  • 14) Murphy PS, Dzik-Jurasz AS, Leach MO, Rowland IJ. The effect of Gd-DTPA on T(1)-weighted choline signal in human brain tumours. Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 20:127-130.
  • 15) Smith JK, Kwock L, Castillo M. Effects of contrast material on single-volume proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21:1084-1089.
  • 16) Spampinato MV, Smith JK, Kwock L, et al. Cerebral blood volume measurements and proton MR spectroscopy in grading of oligodendroglial tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188:204-212.
  • 17) Bruhn H, Frahm J, Gyngell ML, et al. Noninvasive differentiation of tumors with use of localized H-1 MR spectroscopy in vivo: initial experience in patients with cerebral tumors. Radiology 1989; 172: 541–548.
  • 18) Castillo M, Kwock L, Mukherji SK. Clinical applications of MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17:1–15.
  • 19) Krouwer HG, Kim TA, Rand SD, et al. Single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy of nonneoplastic brain lesions suggestive of a neoplasm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19:1695–1703.
  • 20) Poptani H, Gupta RK, Roy R, Pandey R, Jain VK, Chhabra DK. Characterization of intracranial mass lesions with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16:1593–1603.
  • 21) Segebarth CM, Baleriaux DF, Luyten PR, den Hollander JA. Detection of metabolic heterogeneity of human intracranial tumors in vivo by H-1 NMR spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1990; 13:62–76.
  • 22) Rand SD, Prost R, Haughton V, et al. Accuracy of single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy in distinguishing neoplastic from nonneoplastic brain lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18:1695–1704.
  • 23) Demaerel P, Johannik K, van Hecke P, et al. Localized 1H NMR spectroscopy in fifty cases of newly diagnosed intracranial tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:67–76.
  • 24) Herholz K, Heindel W, Luyten PR, et al. In vivo imaging of glucoseconsumption and lactate concentration in human gliomas. Ann Neurol 1992; 31:319–327.
  • 25) Ott D, Hennig J, Ernst T. Human brain tumors: assessment with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 1993; 186:745–752.
  • 26) Shimizu H, Kumabe T, Tominaga T, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of malignancy of brain tumors with proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17:737-747.
  • 27) Kugel H, Heindel W, Ernestus R-I, Bunke J, du Mensil R, Friedmann G. Human brain tumors: spectral patterns detected with localized H-1 MR spectroscopy. Radiology 1992; 183:701–709.
  • 28) Fulham MJ, Bizzi A, Dietz MJ, et al. Mapping of brain tumor metabolites with proton MR spectroscopic imaging: clinical relevance. Radiology 1992; 185:675-686.
  • 29) Kinoshita Y, Kajiwara H, Yokota A, Koga Y. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors: an in vitro study. Neurosurgery 1994; 35:606–614.
  • 30) Tien RD, Lai PH, Smith JS, Lazeyras F. Single-voxel proton brain spectroscopy exam (PROBE/SV) in patients with primary brain tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:201-209.
  • 31) Meyerand ME, Pipas JM, Mamourian A, Tosteson TD, Dunn JF. Classification of biopsy-confirmed brain tumors using single-voxel MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20:117–123.
  • 32) Moller-Hartmann W, Herminghaus S, Krings T, et al. Clinical application of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the diagnosis of intracranial mass lesions. Neuroradiology 2002; 44:371–381.
  • 33) Kimura T, Sako K, Gotoh T, Tanaka K, Tanaka T. In vivo singlevoxel proton MR spectroscopy in brain lesions with ring-like enhancement. NMR Biomed 2001; 14:339–349.
  • 34) Poptani H, Gupta RK, Jain VK, Roy R, Pandey R. Cystic intracranial mass lesions: possible role of in vivo MR spectroscopy in its differential diagnosis. Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 13:1019-1029.
  • 35) Luyten PR, Marien AJ, Heindel W, , et al. Metabolic imaging of patients with intracranial tumors: 1H MR spectroscopic imaging and PET. Radiology 1990; 176:791–799.
  • 36) Martin AJ, Liu H, Hall WA, Truwit CL. Preliminary assessment of turbo spectroscopic imaging for targeting in brain biopsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22:959-968.
  • 37) Bizzi A, Movsas B, Tedeschi G, et al. Response of non-Hodgkin lymphoma to radiation therapy: early and long-term assessment with H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1995; 194:271-276.
  • 38) Law M, Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, Arnett J, Litt AW. High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging. Radiology 2002; 222:715-721.
  • 39) Bendszus M, Warmuth-Metz M, Klein R. MR spectroscopy in gliomatosis cerebri. Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21:375–380.
  • 40) Pyhtinen J. Proton MR spectroscopy in gliomatosis cerebri. Neuroradiology 2000; 42:612–615.
  • 41) Uysal E, Erturk M, Yildirim H, et al. Multivoxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy in gliomatosis cerebri. Acta Radiol 2005; 46:621-624.
  • 42) Garg M, Gupta RK, Husain M, et al. Brain abscesses: etiologic categorization with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2004; 230:519-527.
  • 43) Kim DG, Choe WJ, Chang KH, et al. In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of central neurocytomas. Neurosurgery 2000; 46:329-334.
  • 44) Lee DY, Chung CK, Hwang YS, et al. Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor: radiological findings (including PET, SPECT, and MRS) and surgical strategy. J Neurooncol 2000; 47:167–174.
  • 45) Sener RN. Neuro-Behcet's disease: diffusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24:1612-1614.
  • 46) Baysal T, Ozisik HI, Karlidag R, et al. Proton MRS in Behcet’s disease with and without neurological findings. Neuroradiol 2003; 45:860-864.
  • 47) Appenzeller S, Li LM, Costallat LT, Cendes F. Neurometabolic changes in normal white matter may predict appearance of hyperintense lesions in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2007; 16:963-971.
Marmara Medical Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 1019-1941
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1988
  • Yayıncı: Marmara Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Akdeniz üniversitesi tıp fakültesinde uygulanan özel çalışma modülleri ile ilgili öğretim üyesi ve öğrencilerin görüşleri: İlk sonuçlar

Yeşim ŞENOL, Erol GÜRPINAR, Çiler ÖZENCİ, Nilüfer BALCI, Utku ŞENOL

Analysis of the patients admitted to Marmara University Hospital with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

TÜRKAY AKBAŞ, Neşe İMERYÜZ, Aysun BOZBAŞ, Nurdan TÖZÜN

Yazılı basında çıkan sağlık haberlerinin incelenmesi

Kübra KAYTAZ, M Fatih TÜTÜNCÜ, N Hale ERBATUR, Cengiz ERTEKİN, İ Ahmet Özdemir AKTAN

BİR TIP FAKÜLTESİNDEKİ ÖĞRETİM ÜYESİ, UZMAN VE ASİSTAN DOKTORLARIN SÜREKLİ MESLEKİ GELİŞİM KAVRAMINA BAKIŞ AÇILARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Seyhan HIDIROĞLU, Muhammed ÖNSÜZ, Ahmet TOPUZOĞLU, Melda KARAVUŞ

A 59-year old man with portal-splenic and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis

Payman MOHARRAMZADEH, Samad Shams VAHDATI, Parastou HOSEINI, Mahboob POURAGHAEI

YAZILI BASINDA ÇIKAN SAĞLIK HABERLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Kübra KAYTAZ, M. TÜTÜNCÜ, N. ERBATUR, Cengiz ERTEKİN, Ahmet AKTAN

A 93 year old woman with acute changes in the central nervous system

Vitorino M SANTOS, Fabio H B SANTOS, Cristina T LEAL, Armanda D PRATE, Cristina T CRUZ

Devlet hastanesinde bir yıllık toksoplazma seropozitifliği

Leyla BEYTUR, Meryem IRAZ, Mesut KARADAN, Erdal KARCI, Pınar Yüce FIRAT, Ayşe TURAN, Fehime DEPECİK, ÜLKÜ KARAMAN

MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ HASTANESİNE VARİS DIŞI ÜST GASTROİNTESTİNAL KANAMA İLE BAŞVURAN HASTALARIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Türkay AKBAŞ, Neşe İMERYÜZ, Aysun BOZBAŞ, Nurdan TÖZÜN

AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ TIP FAKÜLTESİNDE UYGULANAN ÖZEL ÇALIŞMA MODÜLLERİ İLE İLGİLİ ÖĞRETİM ÜYESİ VE ÖĞRENCİLERİN GÖRÜŞLERİ: İLK SONUÇLAR

Yeşim ŞENOL, Erol GÜRPINAR, Çiler ÖZENCİ, Nilüfer BALCI, Utku ŞENOL