Susanne Öner, Ahmet Nohutçu

219

PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY RESULTS OF A-TWO-YEAR STUDY

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyse the conditions of the penetrating keratoplasties (PK) performed at Haydarpaşa Numune Hospital over 2 years time, and to compare the outcome with previous studies.Method: Forty-five eyes of 40 patients were investigated retrospectively. Donor corneas were trephined to 7.00-7.50 mm sized buttons. In 30 eyes continuous, and in 15 eyes interrupted sutures were used. Eight procedures were combined with extracapsular cataract extraction. Postoperative treatment consisted of topical antibiotic, corticosteroid, mydriatic, and artificial tear drops. If required, additional treatment was initiated.Results: Thirty-nine procedures were primary PK, 6 were rekeratoplasties. The most frequent indication for PK was corneal leucoma. No serious intraoperative complication was observed. A clear corneal graft was obtained in 77.8% after a follow-up of 4-31 months. Visual acuity increased in 35 eyes. The most frequent postoperative complication was glaucoma. Primary graft failure was observed in 2, and immunologic graft failure in 5 eyes. Rekeratoplasty was performed in 3 eyes.Conclusion: The results of our study are comparable to previous studies. Even with the inclusion of high-risk PK, the frequency ofobtaining a clear corneal graft is high, and is likely to increase further with rigid eyebanking procedures and ABO blood group-matching.Key Words: Penetrating keratoplasty, Graft rejection, Eyebanking.
PDF

___

  • Bersudsky V, Blum-tlareuveni T, Rehany U, Rumelt S. The profile of repeated corneal transplantation. Ophthalmology 2001; 198: 461-469.
  • Chan JH, Dua NS, Poivell-Richards A, Jones DRE, Harris IN. Effect of ABO blood group mismatching on corneal epithelial cells: an in vitro study. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: I 104- 1109.
  • Bulut S, Akova YA, Onat N, Duman S. Penetrating keratoplasty combined with extracapsular cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. MlY Ofthalmoloji 1998; 3: 240-243.
  • Sridhar fIS, Nurthy S, BansaI AK, Rao OTİ.
  • Corneal triple procedure: Indications,
  • complications, and outcomes. Cornea 2000; 19: 333-335.
  • Doğanay S, Doğanay Z, Bahadır N, Doğan OK. Penetrating keratoplasty combined with intraocular lens implantation. NH Oftalmoloji 1998; 3: 255-258.
  • S u s a n n e Öner , et al.
  • Güven D, Aksünger A, Bilgihan K, Akata F, Hasanreisoğlu B. Our results of triple procedure surgery. MP1 Oftalmoloji 1996; 3: 385-388.
  • Kurnaz E, Kubaloğlu A, Öztürk O. Penetrating keratoplasty in treatment of nontraumatic corneal perforation. T Oft Gaz 2003; 33: 600- 605.
  • Jonas JB, Katık RN, Budde WN. Tectonic sklerokeratoplasty and tectonic penetrating keratoplasty as treatment for perforated or predescemetal corneal ulcers. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132: 14-18.
  • Jonas JB, Rank RN, Budde WN. Immunologic graft reactions after allogenic penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 133: 437-443.
  • Williams KA. The Australian Corneal Graft Registry. 1990-1992 report. Aust Pi ZJ Ophthalmol 1993; 21: 1-48.
  • Hohutçu AF, Karslıgil N, Bayraktar Ş, Beştaş FI, Koca I. Penetrating keratoplasty in Haydarpaşa Humune Hospital. Haydarpaşa Piumune Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi 1995; 35: 82-84.
  • Özkurt Y, Oral Y, Oğuz ET, Rodop Ö, Arsan A, Doğan ÖK. Glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. T Oft Gaz 2003; 33: 717-720.
  • Doğanay S, Doğanay Z, Bahadır N, Doğan ÖK. Keratoconus and keratoplasty. NPi Oftalmoloji 1998; 3: 229-232.
  • Lass JH, Lembach RG, Park SB. Clinical management of keratoconus. /I multicenter analysis. Ophthalmology 1990; 97: 433-445.
  • Onat N, Hurözler AB, Bozkurt S, Aslan BS, Duman S. Selection of donor cornea for
  • patients with keratoconus. T Klin J Ophthalmol 2003; 12: 9-14.
  • The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies (CCCT) Research Group. Effectiveness of histocompatibility matching in high risk corneal transplantation. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 1392-1403.
  • Borderie VN, Lopez N, Vedie F, et al. ABO antigen blood group compatibility in corneal transplantation. Cornea 1997; 16: 16.
  • Kirkness CM, Ficker LA. Risk factors for the development of postkeratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea 1992; I I: 427-432.
  • Hurözler AB, Karalezli A, Budak K Onat N. Duman S. The development of glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty and risk factors. T Klin J Ophthalmol 2003; 12: 37 4 I.
  • Yılmaz FG, Kavalcıoğlu Ö, Akova YA, Onat N, Duman S. Penetrating keratoplasty in chemical corneal burns. NH Oftalmoloji 2000; 7: 11-13.
  • Zimmerman T, Olson R, Waltman S, Kaulman
  • H. Transplant size and elevated intraocular pressure. Postkeratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 1978; 96: 2231-2233.
  • Vajpayee RB, Sharma V, Sharma Pi, Panda A, Taylor HR. Evaluation of techniques of single continuous suturing in penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 134- 138.
  • Cursiefen C, Kiichle N, Haumann GOH.
  • Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty: histopathology of 1.250
  • corneal buttons. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 85: 42-47.
Marmara Medical Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 1019-1941
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1988
  • Yayıncı: Marmara Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

THE ROLE OF CYSTOSCOPY IN THE EVALUATION OF HEMATURIA IN THE PRESENCE OF NORMAL RADIOLOGICAL AND MICROBIOLOGICAL WORK-UP

Cenk YAZICI, Levent TÜRKERİ, Yalçın ÜLKER, Ferruh ŞİMŞEK

I N T R A M E D U L L A R Y C A V E R N O M A

Serdar Özgen, Deniz Konya, Mustafa Güdük, Selçuk Peker, Necmettin Pamir

Nurettin Aka, Zeynep Tuzcular Vural, Gültekin Köse

Arif BAHAR, Ferhan Karademir, Gökhan Aydemir, İsmail Göçmen

ASTHMA AND OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIC DISORDERS

Müzeyyen DOĞAN, Emel ERYÜKSEL, Tekin BAĞLAM, Turgay ÇELİKEL

Susanne Öner, Ahmet Nohutçu