___

• I . In Cyrillic
• 1. Бойцов, А. Выдача преступников. Санкт-Петербург, 2004;
• 2. Велчев, Б. Имунитетът по наказателното право на Република България, С., 2001;
• 3. Гиргинов, А. Екстрадицията по българското право. С., 1998;
• 4. Гиргинов, А. Международна правна помощ по наказателни дела, С., 2012;
• 5. Глумин, М. Международно-правоваяпомощь по уголовнымделам как институт уголовно-процессуального права России. Нижний Новгород, 2005;
• 6. Димов, Д. Процесуалноправни аспекти на сътрудничеството с Международния наказателен съд, в „Международното наказателно правосъдие в контекста на българското законодателство”, Асоциация „Прозрачност без граници”, С., 2004, с. 37;
• 7. Игнатова, Б. Разпит чрез телефонна конференция и видео конференция при разследване на престъпления, извършени от чужденци, Съвременно право, 2007, бр. 5, с. 95;
• 8. Коняхин, В. Институт экстрадиции: уголовно-правовая регламентация, Законность, 2005, № 1, с. 17;
• 9. Маринова, Г. Екстрадицията и Европейската заповед за арест,С., 2009;
• 10. Машева, Д. Трансфер на осъдени лица, Европейска интеграция и право, С., 2009, № 2, с. 7;
• 11. Мезяев, А. Международные договоры об экстрадиции и проблема смертной казни, Государство и право, 2003, № 3, с. 86;
• 12. Милинчук, В. Институт правовой помощи по уголовным делам. Действующая практика и перспективы развития.Москва, 2001;
• 13. Панов, В. Сотрудничество государств в борьбе с международными уголовными преступлениями, Москва, 1993;
• 14. Панова, П. Европейската заповед за арест. С., 2009;
• 15. Раймундов, П. Наказателно-процесуални въпроси при разследване на престъпления срещу фининсовите средства на Европейския съюз, Асоциация „Прозрачност без граници”, С., 2008;
• 16. Ръководство ”MODUS OPERANDI”: Международно правно сътрудничество по наказателни дела (авт. Которова-Духлакова, И. ,Йосифов, Ц., Смилянова Янева, В., Машева, Д., Цветанов, Е. и Петров, С.). С., 2009;
• 17. Сливенски, И. Принципи на екстрадиционното право (Българско екстрадиционно право). С., 1934;
• 18. Цветков, С. Съвместните екипи за международно разследване на трафика на хора с цел експлоатация, Б-н на Асоциацията на прокурорите в България, 2001, № 1, с. 119;
• 19. Цепелев, В. Международноесотрудничество в борьбе с преступностью, Москва, 2001.
• II. In Latin
• 1. Alegre, S. and Leaf, M. Mutual recognition in European Judicial Cooperation: a step too far too soon? Case study- the European Arrest Warrant, in “European Law Journal”, Vol. 10, (2), 2004, p. 200;
• 2. Alonso García, R. Community and national legal orders: autonomy, integration and interaction, in “Collected courses of the Academy of European Law”, 1996, Vol. VII, Book 1, p. 59;
• 3. Barret, G. Cooperation in Justice and Home Affairs in the European Union - An Overview and A Critique, in “BARRETT, G., Justice Cooperation in the European Union”, Dublin, 1997, p. 1;
• 4. Bassiouni, M C. Post-Conflict Justice in Iraq: An Appraisal of the Iraqi Special Tribunal, 23 September 2005, from:http://insct.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Bassiouni.Postconflict-Justice-in-Iraq.2005.pdf
• 5. Bassiouni, M C. International Extradition: United States law and practice, New York, 2007;
• 6. Bassiouni, M C. International CriminalLaw, Volume II, 3-rd ed., Leiden, 2009;
• 7. Belfiore, R. Movement of evidence in the EU: The present scenario and possible future developments, in “European journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice”, 2009, Vol. 17, p. 1;
• 8. Bruggemann, W. Judicial co-operation in the fields of drug-trafficking, money launderingand fraud, in“International law and the Hague’s 750-th anniversary”, The Hague, 1999, p. 21;
• 9. Girginov, A. Preparation of outgoing requests by Republika Srpska for international legal assistance in criminal matters (law, practice, recommendations), in ”Scientific Research Journal of SWU”, Volume VII, 2009;
• 10. Girginov, A.:BiH – an example for Iraq? , in “New Europe”, 2012 (25 Nov-01 Dec), No. 1008, p. 15.
• 11. Gless, S. Police and Judicial Cooperation between the European Union Member States. Results and Prospects, in “FIJNAUT, C. and OUWERKERK, J., The Future of Police and Judicial Cooperation in the European Union”, Leiden, 2010, p. 25;
• 12. De Wree, E., Vander Beken, T. and Vermeulen, G.The transfer of sentenced persons in Europe. Much ado about reintegration, in “Punishment and Society” 2009, Vol. 11 (1), p. 111;
• 13. The Future of Police and Judicial Cooperation in the EU, edited by Fijnaut, I. and J. Ouwerkerk, Leiden, 2010;
• 14. Koering-Joulin, R. Judicial Assistance in Criminal Cases within the European Union, in “DELMAS-MARTY, M. S., M. and MORGIN, G., What kind of Criminal Policy for Europe?”, The Hague, 1996, p. 169;
• 15. Konstanitinides, T. The Europeanization of extraditions: how many light years away to mutual confidence?, in “ECKES, C. and KONSTANDINIDES, T., Crime within the Area of Freedom Security and Justice. A European Public Or- der”, Cambridge, 2011, p. 192;
• 16. Lillich, R. The Soering Case, in “The American Journal of International Law”, 1991, Vol. 85 (1), p. 128;
• 17. Macauley, R. FIGHTING CORRUPTION, Incriminations, Thematic Review of GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round, Council of Europe – Strasbourg, 2012, P. 47, point 47.
• 18. Militello, V. and Mangiaracina, A. The Future of Mutual Assistance Conventions in the European Union”, in “FIJNAUT, C. and OUWERKERK, J., The Future of Police and Judicial Cooperation in the European Union”, Leiden, 2010, p. 169;
• 19. Morgan, C. The Potential of Mutual Recognition as a Leading Policy Principle, in “FIJNAUT, C. and OUWERKERK, J., The Future of Police and Judicial Cooperation in the European Union”, Leiden, Brill, 2010, p. 231;
• 20. Mylonaki, Emmanouela-Burton, T. Extradition as a tool in the Fight against Transnational Crime: a Holistic Evaluation, in “JURA” scientific magazine-University of Pécs, Law Faculty, 2011, No. 2, p. 175.
• 21. Nicholls, C., C. Montgomery and J. Knowles. The law of extradition and mutual assistance: international criminal law: practice and procedure, London, 2002;
• 22. Nilsson, H. From classical judicial cooperation to mutual recognition, in ”Revue Internationale de Droit Penale”, 2006 (1), Vol. 77, p. 53;
• 23. Plachta, M. The role of Double Criminality in international co-operation in penal matters, in ”Double Criminality. Studies in International Criminal Law”, edited by Jareborg, N., Upsala, 1989, p. 84;
• 24. Rafaraci, T. Procedural Safeguards and the Principle of Ne Bis In Idem in the European Union, in ”European Cooperation in Penal Matters: Issues and Perspectives”, M. C. Bassiouni-V. Militello-H. Satzger (eds.), CEDAM, 2008, pp. 363 401;
• 25. Ristau, B. International judicialassistance, International Law Institute, Washington, 1984;
• 26. Sahinkaya, Y.: Extraterritorial Effect of the Right to Fair Trial: How to test the Flagrant Denial of Fair Trial in Extradition Cases under International Human Rights Law, in “Human Rights Review” (Ankara, Turkey), Vol. III, Issue 2, Dec 2013, p. 1.
• 27. Saltzger, H. and Zimmerman, F. From traditional models of judicial assistance to the principle of mutual recognition: new developments of the actual paradigm of the European cooperation in penal matters, in “BASSIOUNI, C., MILITELLO, V. and SATZGER, H., European Cooperation in Penal Matters: Issues and Perspectives”, Milan, 2008, p. 337;
• 28. Tak, P. Bottlenecks in International Police and Judicial Cooperation in the EU, in “European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice”, 2000, Vol. 4, p. 343;
• 29. Van den Wyngaert, C. and Stessens, G. Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters in the European Union, in ”Changes in Society, Crime and Criminal Justice in Europe”, Vol. 2: International Organised and Corporate Crime, edited by Fijnaut, C., Goethals, J., Peters, T. and Walgrave, L., Antwerp, 1995, p. 137;
• 30. Vermeulen, G., W. De Bondt and Van Damme, Y. EU cross-border gathering and use of evidence in criminal matters. Towards mutual recognition of investigative measures and free movement of evidence?, Maklu, 2010;
• 31. Vermeulen, G., W. De Bondt and C. Ryckman (eds.) Rethinking international cooperation in criminal matters in the EU. Moving beyond actors, bringing logic back, footed in reality, Maklu, 2012;
• 32. Wise E. Obligation to extraditeorprosecute, in ”International LawReview”, 1993, Vol. 27 (1,2), p. 268;
• 33. Wouters, J. and Naert, F. Of arrest warrants, terrorist offences and extradition deals: An appraisal of the EU’s main criminal law measures against terrorism after “11 September, in “Common Market Law Review”, 2004, Vol. 41, p. 909.