___

• Andrews, D.A. and Bonta, J. (2010) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, New Providence, NJ.: Anderson Publishing.
• Bonta, J. (2004) ‘Effective practice: state of the art – or science?’ in: D. Andrews, C. Hollin, P. Raynor, C. Trotter and B. Armstrong, Personal Effectiveness in Working with Offenders, Dinas Powys: Cognitive Centre Foundation.
• Bonta, J., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Yessine, A., Gutierrez, L. and Li, J. (2010) The Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision: Risk-needresponsivity in the Real World (Corrections Research User Report 2010–01), Ottawa, ON.: Public Safety Canada.
• Bottoms, A.E. and McWilliams, W. (1979) ‘A non-treatment paradigm for probation practice’, British Journal of Social Work, 9, 159–202.
• Bridges, A. (2011) Probation and Youth Offending Work: A Tribute to Those who do it Well, London: HM Inspectorate of Probation.
• Brody, S.R. (1976) The Effectiveness of Sentencing (Home Office Research Study 35), London: HMSO.
• Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J. (2006) Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach, London: Sage.
• Christie, N. (1981) Limits to Pain, Oxford: Martin Robertson. Correctional Service of Canada (2002) Circles of Support and Accountability: A Guide to Training Potential Volunteers, Ottawa, ON.: Correctional Service of Canada.
• Devos, A. (2009) ‘Balans van het 10-jarig bestaan van de justitiehuizen’ [‘Assessing the results of ten years of the Houses of Justice’] (unpublished speech to the ten-year Colloquium of the Houses of Justice, Brussels, 2 December. Translation by Aline Bauwens).
• Dowden, C. and Andrews, D. (2004) ‘The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: a meta-analysis’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 203–14.
• Downes, D. and Hansen, K. (2006) Welfare and Punishment: The Relationship Between Welfare Spending and Imprisonment (Briefing 2), London: Crime and Society Foundation.
• Duff, A. (2001) Punishment, Communication and Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Durnescu, I. (2011) ‘Pains of probation: effective practice and human rights’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 530–45.
• Folkard, M.S., Smith, D.E. and Smith, D.D. (1976) IMPACT Volume II: The Results of the Experiment (Home Office Research Study 36), London: HMSO.
• Garland, D. (1997) ‘Probation and the reconfiguration of crime control’, in: R. Burnett (Ed.), The Probation Service: Responding to Change (Proceedings of the Probation Studies Unit First Colloquium: Probation Studies Unit Report No. 3), Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Criminological Research.
• Gendreau, P. and Andrews, D. (2001) The Correctional Program Assessment Inventory (CPAI) 2000, Saint John, NB.: University of New Brunswick.
• Grünhut, M. (1952) ‘Probation in Germany’, Howard Journal, 8, 168–74.
• Hart, H.L.A. (1968) Punishment and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hollis, V. (2007) Reconviction Analysis of Programme Data Using Interim Accredited Programmes Software (IAPS), London: National Offender Management Service.
• Home Office (1984) Probation Service in England and Wales: Statement of National Objectives and Priorities, London: Home Office.
• Home Office (1995) Strengthening Punishment in the Community, Cm. 2780. House of Commons (2011) The Role of the Probation Service (Justice Committee Report), London: House of Commons.
• Ledger, J. (2010) ‘Rehabilitation revolution: will probation pay the price?’, Probation Journal, 57, 415–22.
• Lewis, S. (2005) ‘Rehabilitation: headline or footnote in the new penal policy?’, Probation Journal, 52, 119–35.
• London Probation Trust (2011) Available at: http://www.london-probation. org.uk (accessed 19 June 2011).
• Lopez-Rey, M. (1957) ‘United Nations activities and international trends in probation’, Howard Journal, 9, 346–53.
• Lowenkamp, C., Latessa, E. and Smith, P. (2006) ‘Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention’, Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 575–94.
• Mantle, G. (2006) ‘Probation: dead, dying or poorly?’, Howard Journal, 45, 321–4.
• Martinson, R. (1974) ‘What works? Questions and answers about prison reform’, The Public Interest, 35, 22–54.
• McGuire, J. (2004) Understanding Psychology and Crime, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
• McKnight, J. (2009) ‘Speaking up for probation’, Howard Journal, 48, 327–43.
• McNeill, F. (2011) ‘Probation, credibility and justice’, Probation Journal, 58, 9–22.
• McNeill, F., Raynor, P. and Trotter, C. (Eds.) (2010) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice, Abingdon: Willan.
• McWilliams, W. (1983) ‘The mission to the English police courts 1876–1936’, Howard Journal, 22, 129–47.
• McWilliams, W. (1985) ‘The mission transformed: professionalisation of probation between the wars’, Howard Journal, 24, 257–74.
• McWilliams, W. (1986) ‘The English probation system and the diagnostic ideal’, Howard Journal, 25, 241–60.
• McWilliams, W. (1987) ‘Probation, pragmatism and policy’, Howard Journal, 26, 97–121. Merrington, S. and Hine, J. (2001) Evaluating Probation Work with Offenders, London: Home Office.
• Mills, H., Silvestri, A. and Grimshaw, R. with Silberhorn-Armantrading, F. (2010) Prison and Probation Expenditure 1999–2009, London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
• Ministry of Justice (2010a) Offender Management Caseload Statistics 2009, London: Ministry of Justice.
• Ministry of Justice (2010b) Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders, Cm. 7972.
• Ministry of Justice (2011) Criminal Justice Statistics Quarterly Update to December 2010, London: Ministry of Justice.
• National Audit Office (2009) The National Offender Management Information System, London: National Audit Office.
• National Probation Service (2001) A New Choreography, London: National Probation Service for England and Wales.
• Nellis, M. (2004) ‘Into the field of corrections: the end of English probation in the early 21st century?’ Cambrian Law Review, 35, 115–34.
• Oldfield, M. and Grimshaw, R. (2010) Probation Resources, Staffing and Workloads 2001–2008, London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
• Parker, T. (1966) The Unknown Citizen, Harmondsworth: Penguin. Probation Board for Northern Ireland (2011) Available at: http://%20www. pbni.org.uk(accessed 19 June 2011).
• Radzinowicz, L. (Ed.) (1958) The Results of Probation (A Report of the Cambridge Department of Criminal Science), London: Macmillan.
• Ramsbotham, D. (2010) Hansard, House of Lords Debates, vol. 716, part 30, col. 1146, 21January 2010.
• Ravagnani, L. (2011) Personal communication to members of the European Society of Criminology’s Working Group on Community Sanctions, 13 June.
• Raynor, P. (1985) Social Work, Justice and Control, Oxford: Blackwell.
• Raynor, P. (2007) ‘Community penalties: probation, “what works” and offender management’, in: M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Raynor, P. (2011) The Jersey Supervision Skills Study (Offender Engagement Research Bulletin), London: Ministry of Justice.
• Raynor, P. and Robinson, G. (2009) Rehabilitation, Crime and Justice, 2nd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Raynor, P. and Vanstone, M. (1997) Straight Thinking On Probation (STOP): The Mid Glamorgan Experiment (Probation Studies Unit Report No. 4), Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Criminological Research.
• Raynor, P. and Vanstone, M. (2001) ‘Straight Thinking On Probation: evidencebased practice and the culture of curiosity’, in: G. Bernfeld, D. Farrington and A. Leschied (Eds.), Offender Rehabilitation in Practice, Chichester: Wiley.
• Raynor, P., Ugwudike, P. and Vanstone, M. (2010) ‘Skills and strategies in probation supervision: the Jersey study’, in: F. McNeill, P. Raynor and C. Trotter (Eds.), Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice, Abingdon: Willan.
• Reid, J. (2006) Speech to Wormwood Scrubs Prison, 7 November. Rex, S. (2005) Reforming Community Penalties, Cullompton: Willan.
• Rotman, E. (1990) Beyond Punishment: A New View of the Rehabilitation of Offenders, Westport, CT.: Greenwood Press.
• Shaw, M. (1974) Social Work in Prisons (Home Office Research Study 22), London: HMSO.
• Sherman, L. and Strang, H. (2007) Restorative Justice: The Evidence, London: The Smith Institute.
• Straw, J. (2008) Speech to Royal Society of Arts, 27 October.
• Taxman, F., Yancey, C. and Bilanin, J. (2006) Proactive Community Supervision in Maryland: Changing Offender Outcomes, Richmond, VA.: Virginia Commonwealth University and University of Maryland.
• Tyler, T. (1990) Why People Obey the Law, New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press. Underdown, A. (1998) Strategies for Effective Offender Supervision: Report of the HMIP What Works Project, London: Home Office.
• Vanstone, M. (1993) ‘A “missed opportunity” re-assessed: the influence of the day training centre experiment on the criminal justice system and probation policy and practice’, British Journal of Social Work, 23, 213–29.
• Vanstone, M. and Raynor, P. (2010) ‘Supervising freedom: the philosophy, values and historical origins of probation’, in: M. Herzog-Evans (Ed.), Transnational Criminology Manual, vol. 3, Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers.
• Walker, N., Farrington, D. and Tucker, G. (1981) ‘Reconviction rates of adult males after different sentences’, British Journal of Criminology, 21, 357–60.