20852

Yöre Halkının Doğal Çevre İle Olan Etkileşimlerinde Fiziksel Çevre Koşullarının Etkisi: Kahramanmaraş Ahır Dağı Örneği

Bu çalışma kapsamında; Kahramanmaraş Ahır Dağı ve yakın çevresinde yaşayan yöre halkının, doğal çevreden yararlanma biçimlerinin analiz edilmesi ve fiziksel çevre koşullarının bu yararlanma biçimleri üzerine etkilerinin ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Yöre halkının doğal çevreden yararlanma biçimi anketler yoluyla analiz edilmiş, elde edilen veriler SPSS 11.5 programı ile değerlendirilmiş, daha sonra bu veriler yükselti ve arazi örtüsü ile ilişkilendirerek varyans analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda elde edilen veriler doğa koruma çalışmalarına altlık oluşturacak şekilde yorumlanmıştır. Sonuç olarak; dağlık alanlarda fiziksel çevre koşullarının yöre halkının gelir durumu, eğitim durumu, geçim kaynaklarının çeşitliliği, hayata bakış açılarını, çevresel baskıların çeşitliliği ve derecesi ile rekreasyonel çekiciliği etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlardan hareketle yöre halkının eğitim seviyesinin yükseltilmesi, çevre bilincini ve farkındalıkları arttıracak eğitimlerin verilmesi, alternatif geçim kaynaklarının desteklenmesi, mera alanlarının artırılması önerileri geliştirilmiştir.

The Interaction of the Physical Environment Conditions With Local People: The Case of The Region Ahir Mountain of Kahramanmaraş

The aim of this study was to analyze the ways of people ofKahramanmaraş Ahir Dağı, benefiting from the naturalenvironment and the effects of physical environmental conditions onthese forms of utilization. The way of local population benefited fromthe natural environment has analyzed by means of questionnairesand the obtained data were evaluated by SPSS. Then, the obtaineddata was analyzed by using the variance analysis by associating withthe elevation and land cover. The data obtained from the analysiswere interpreted to the basis for nature conservation studies. As aresult; physical environment conditions in mountainous areasaffected by the recreational attractiveness of the local people withtheir income status, educational status, variety of livelihoods, theirperspective on life, the variety and degree of environmentalpressures and the degree of environmental pressures. Based on theresults obtained, it has been proposed to increase the education levelof the local people, to provide education to increase environmentalawareness and awareness, to support alternative livelihoods and toincrease pasture areas.

PDF

___

Avcı V 2017. The Distribution of Population and Settlements According to the Elevation Zones in Bingöl Province. Bingöl University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences (13): 201-222.
Atasoy A, Özşahin E 2013. Does Populatıon Change Accordıng to Altıtude? Hatay Sample. Bingöl University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences 6(26):92-109.
Baylan E 2009. Examination of Connections Among Nature Believes, Culture and Environmental Problems In Theoretical Contex, Ankara University Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(2): 67-74. (In Turkish).
Gibbs CJ, Bromely DW 1990. Institutional Arrangements for Management of Rural Resources: Community-Property Regimes, In: Berkes, F. (Ed.), Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community-Based Sustainable Development. Belhaven Press, London, 22–33.
Gibson CC, Marks SA 1995. Transforming Rural Hunters into Conservationists: An Assessment of Community-Based Wildlife Management Programs in Africa, World Development 23 (6): 941–957.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-3875-9
Iswandono E, Zuhud EAM, Hikmat A 2015. Integrating Local Culture into Forest Conservation: A Case Study of The Manggarai Tribe in Ruteng Mountains, Indonesia, JMHT 21 (2): 55-64, ISSN:2087-0469.
Kang HM, Kim H, Lee CH 2017. Changes and Development Plans in The Mountain Villages of South Korea: Comparison of The First and Second National Surveys, Journal of Mountain Sciences, 14 (8): 1473-1489.
Karagel H, Karagel DÜ 2010. Geographical Factors Effect to Establish of The Settlements in The County of Devrek, Nature Sciences, Journal of New World Academy, 5(2):76-97.
Kısakürek Ş 2006.Kahramanmaraş Çimen Dağı Örneğinde Dağlık Alan Yönetim Planlaması. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Ana Bilim Dalı Doktora Tezi. YY Sy.
Kısakürek Ş, Karadeniz N 2009. Management Planinng of Çimen Mountain, Kahramanmaraş, Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 15(2): 173-180.
Rao K, Geisler C 1990. The Social Consequences of Protected Areas Development for Residens Populations, Society and Natural Resourcecs, 3: 19-32.
Özşahin E 2014. Analysis of The Natural Environment Features of Kuseyr Plateau by GIS Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences. 7 (24): 57-83.
Şengün MT 2007. The Natural Environment Planning and Natural Environment-Human Relationships on Harput Plateau, Fırat University Social Science Institute Department of Physical Geography, PhD Thesis, 425.
Tağıl Ş 2007. Land Degradation Risk Assessment for Tuzla Creek Basin(Biga Peninsula) Using A GISBased RUSLE Model. Ecology, 17 (65): 11-20.
Taş B, Yakar M 2010. Land Use for Elevational Zones in Afyonkarahisar Province, Journal of Geographic Science, 8(2): 57-76. (In Turkish).
Tomicevic J, Shannon AS, Milavanovic M 2010. SocioEconomic İmpacts on The Attitudes Towards Conservation of Natural Resources: Case Study from Serbia. Forest Policy and Economics 12(3):157-162.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.09.006 Yan J, Yingying WU, Zhang Y 2010. Livehood Diversification of Farmers and Nomads of Eastern Transect in Tibetian Plateau, Journal of Geographic Sciences, 20 (5): 757-770. https://doi. org/ 10.1007/s11442-010-0809-2
Western, D., Wright, R.M. and Strum, S.C. (Eds.) (1994) Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation. Island Press, Washington DC.