Parçacık Sürü Optimizasyon Algoritmasında Bir Topluluk Atalet Ağırlığı Hesaplama Stratejisi

Parçacık sürüsü optimizasyonunun nihai başarısı, önceki parçacıkların hız değerlerine bağlıdır. Hız,atalet ağırlık katsayısı ile çarpılır ve parçacık sürüsü optimizasyonunun arama yeteneği üzerinde önemlibir etkiye sahiptir. Bu katsayıyı hesaplamak için yapılan önceki çalışmalara bakıldığında atalet ağırlıkkatsayısının çeşitli şekillerde ele alındığı görülmektedir. Bu makalede; diğer sabit, rasgele, doğrusalazalan, küresel yerel en iyi, benzetimli tavlama ve kaotik atalet ağırlığı hesaplama yöntemlerinikullanılan yeni bir topluluk atalet ağırlığı hesaplama stratejisi önerilmiştir. Önerilen yöntemde, diğeryöntemlerin sonuçları uygun bir şekilde birleştirilerek nihai çıktı kararı üretmek için kullanılmaktadır.Deneysel testlerde, bilinen 30 optimizasyon kıyaslama test problemi kullanılmaktadır. Önerilen toplulukstratejisi istatistiksel testlerle kanıtlanmış ve tüm optimizasyon kıyaslama test problemlerinde başarılısonuçlar vermiştir.

AN ENSEMBLE INERTIA WEIGHT CALCULATION STRATEGY IN PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM

The ultimate success of particle swarm optimization depends on the velocity values ofprevious particles. Velocity is multiplied with inertia weight coefficient, and has a significant effect onsearch capability of the particle swarm optimization. When looking at previous studies that are carriedout to calculate this coefficient, it is seen that inertia weight coefficient has been handled in several ways.In this article; a new ensemble inertia weight calculation strategy is proposed that uses other constant,random, linear decreasing, global local best, simulated annealing and chaotic inertia weight calculationmethods. Other methods results are combined and used to make a final output decision in a proper way.In experimental tests, 30 common optimization benchmark test problems are used. Proposed ensemblestrategy is proven by statistical tests and gives successful results in all optimization benchmark testproblems.

___

  • Ala’raj, M., Abbod, M.F., 2016, “Classifiers Consensus System Approach for Credit Scoring”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 104, pp. 89-105, doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.04.013
  • Al-Hassan, W., Fayek, M.B., Shaheen, S.I., “Psosa: An Optimized Particle Swarm Technique for Solving the Urban Planning Problem”, In Computer Engineering and Systems, The 2006 International Conference on, Cairo, Egypt, pp. 401–405 5-7 Nov. 2006, IEEE, 2007.
  • Arasomwan, M.A., Adewumi, A.O., 2013, “On the Performance of Linear Decreasing Inertia Weight Particle Swarm Optimization for Global Optimization”, The Scientific World Journal. 2013.
  • Armano, G., Farmani, M.R., 2016, “Multiobjective Clustering Analysis Using Particle Swarm Optimization”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 55, pp. 184–193, doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.02.009
  • Arumugam, M.S., Rao, MVC., 2006, “On the Performance of the Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm with Various Inertia Weight Variants for Computing Optimal Control of a Class of Hybrid Systems”, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society.
  • Awad, N. H., Ali, M. Z., Liang, J. J., Qu, B. Y., Suganthan P. N., Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2017 Special Session and Competition on Single Objective Bound Constrained Real-Parameter Numerical Optimization, Technical Report, Nanyang Technological University,Singapore, November 2016.
  • Bansal, J.C., Singh, P.K., Saraswat, M., Verma, A., Jadon, S.S., Abraham, A., 2011, “Inertia Weight Strategies in Particle Swarm Optimization”, In: Proceedings of Third World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC-2011), Salamanca, Spain, pp 633–640, 19-21 October. 2011.
  • Bharti, K.K., Singh, P.K., 2016, “Opposition Chaotic Fitness Mutation Based Adaptive Inertia Weight BPSO for Feature Selection in Text Clustering”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 43, pp. 20-34.
  • Çavdar, T., 2016, “PSO Tuned ANFIS Equalizer Based on Fuzzy C-means Clustering Algorithm”, AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, Vol. 70(6), pp. 799–807, doi:10.1016/j.aeue.2016.03.006.
  • Eberhart, R.C., Shi, Y., “Tracking and Optimizing Dynamic Systems with Particle Swarms”, In Evolutionary Computation, 2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on, Seoul, South Korea, Vol. 1, pp. 94–100, 27-30 May 2001.
  • Feng, Y., Teng, G.F., Wang, A.X., Yao, Y.M., “Chaotic Inertia Weight in Particle Swarm Optimization”, In Innovative Computing, Information and Control, Kumamoto, Japan, 2007. ICICIC’07. Second International Conference on, page 475, 5-7 September 2007. IEEE, 2008.
  • Gheisari, S., Meybodi, M.R., 2016, “BNC-PSO: Structure Learning of Bayesian Networks by Particle Swarm Optimization”, Inform Sciences, Vol. 348, pp. 272-89.
  • Ho, Tin Kam, 1998, “The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 20 (8), pp. 832–844. doi:10.1109/34.709601
  • Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R., “Particle Swarm Optimization”, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Netw., 4 (1995), pp. 1942–1948.
  • Kordestani, J.K., Rezvanian, A., Meybodi, M.R., 2016, “An Efficient Oscillating Inertia Weight of Particle Swarm Optimisation for Tracking Optima in Dynamic Environments”, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 2016, Vol. 28(1-2), pp.137-49.
  • Liang, Y., Leung, K.S, 2011, “Genetic Algorithm with Adaptive Elitist-Population Strategies for Multimodal Function Optimization”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 11(2), pp. 2017-34.
  • Lim, W.H., Isa, NAM., 2014, “An Adaptive two-layer Particle Swarm Optimization with Elitist Learning Strategy”, Information Sciences, Vol. 273, pp. 49-72.
  • Maca, P., Pech, P., 2015, “The Inertia Weight Updating Strategies in Particle Swarm Optimisation Based on the Beta Distribution”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering.
  • Nickabadi, A., Ebadzadeh, M.M., Safabakhsh, R., 2011, “A Novel Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm with Adaptive Inertia Weight” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 11(4), pp.3658-70.
  • Pluhacek, M., Senkerik, R., Davendra, D., Oplatkova, Z.K., Zelinka, I., 2013, “On the Behavior and Performance of Chaos Driven PSO Algorithm with Inertia Weight”, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 66(2), pp.122-34.
  • Rokach, L., 2010, “Ensemble-based Classifiers”, Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 33 (1–2), pp.1–39.
  • Shi, Y., Eberhart, R., “A Modified Particle Swarm Optimizer”, In Evolutionary Computation Proceedings, 1998. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence., The 1998 IEEE International Conference on, Anchorage, AK, USA, pp. 69–73, 4-9 May 1998.
  • Shi, Y.H., Eberhart, R.C., “Fuzzy Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization”, Proc. of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Seoul Korea, Vol. 1, pp. 101–106, 27-30 May 2001.
  • Surjanovic, S., Bingham, D., 2013, Virtual Library of Simulation Experiments: Test Functions and Datasets, Retrieved May 13, 2016, from http://www.sfu.ca/~ssurjano.
  • Taherkhani, M., Safabakhsh, R., 2016, “A Novel Stability-Based Adaptive Inertia Weight for Particle Swarm Optimization”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 38, pp. 281-95.
  • Uymaz, S.A., Tezel, G., Yel, E., 2015, “Artificial Algae Algorithm (AAA) for Nonlinear Global Optimization”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 31, pp. 153-71.
  • Whitley, D., 1994, “A Genetic Algorithm Tutorial”, Statistics and Computing, Vol. 4, pp. 65-85.
  • Xiang, Y., Zhou, Y.R., Liu, H.L., 2015, “An Elitism Based Multi-Objective Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 245(1), pp. 168-93.
  • Xin, J., Chen, G., Hai, Y., “A Particle Swarm Optimizer with Multistage Linearly-Decreasing Inertia Weight”, In Computational Sciences and Optimization, 2009, CSO 2009, International Joint Conference on, Sanya, Hainan, China, Vol. 1, pp. 505–508, 24-26 April 2009.
  • Xu, G.L., Wan, S.P., Wang, F., Dong, J.Y., Zeng, Y.F., 2016, “Mathematical Programming Methods for Consistency and Consensus in Group Decision Making with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 98, pp.30-43.
  • Zang, W., Zhang, P., Zhou, C., Guo, L., 2014, “Comparative Study Between Incremental and Ensemble Learning on Data Streams: Case Study”, Journal of Big Data, Vol. 1 (1), pp.1–16.
  • Zhang, L.M., Tang. Y.G., Hua, C.C., Guan, X.P., 2015, “A New Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm with Adaptive Inertia Weight based on Bayesian Techniques”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 28, pp. 138-49.
Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences-Cover
  • Yayıncı: Konya Teknik Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TÜRKİYE'DE ENERJİ TALEBİNİ TAHMİN ETMEK İÇİN DOĞRUSAL FORM KULLANARAK GSA (YERÇEKİMİ ARAMA ALGORİTMASI) VE IWO (YABANİ OT OPTİMİZASYON ALGORİTMASI) TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI

İsmail KOC, Refik NUREDDIN, Humar KAHRAMANLI

ÇEKME BÖLGESİ LİFLİ BETON OLAN CAM FİBER TAKVİYELİ POLİMER (GFRP) ve ÇELİK DONATILI ETRİYESİZ KİRİŞLERİN EĞİLME ETKİSİ ALTINDAKİ DAVRANIŞI ve HASAR ANALİZİ

Lokman GEMİ, Mehmet Alpaslan KÖROĞLU

NANO MATERYAL İÇERİKLİ KATKILARIN YAKIT ÖZELLİKLERİNE VE EGZOZ EMİSYONLARINA ETKİLERİ

İsmet SEZER

FİKİR MADENCİLİĞİ VE DUYGU ANALİZİ, YAKLAŞIMLAR, YÖNTEMLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Barış ÖZYURT, Muhammet Ali AKCAYOL

HESAPLAMALI AKIŞKAN DİNAMİĞİ İLE EKSENEL BİR ÇOCUK KALP DESTEK POMPASI PERFORMANSININ İNCELENMESİ

Rafet YAPICI, Resul TEKE, Ömer İNCEBAY, Hasan ÇINAR, Fehmi MUTLU

Parçacık Sürü Optimizasyon Algoritmasında Bir Topluluk Atalet Ağırlığı Hesaplama Stratejisi

İbrahim Berkan AYDİLEK

Uzay Araç Uygulamaları için Excel üzerinde Isıl Simulasyon Yazılımı

Murat BULUT

DİJİTAL FOTOGRAMETRİ YÖNTEMİ İLE ZEMİN KAYMA YÜZEYLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Atila DEMİRÖZ, Özcan TAN, Ayhan GÖKTEPE, Hakan KARABÖRK

Türkiye'de En Çok Ziyaret Edilen Web Sitelerinin Altyapı ve Güvenlik Açısından Değerlendirilmesi

Atakan DAŞDEMİR, Mustafa Nevzat ÖRNEK, Humar Kahramanlı ÖRNEK

Türkiye’nin Kuzeyindeki Zeminler İçin Farklı Sıcaklıklarda Tek Nokta Likit Limit Deneyindeki Üstel Katsayı

Emre ÜYETÜRK, Nejan HUVAJ