GÖRÜNTÜ SINIFLANDIRMADA DERİN ÖĞRENME YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Bu çalışmada ESA (Evrişimsel Sinir Ağları), ResNet ve AİA (Ağ İçinde Ağ) yaklaşımları kullanılarak oluşturulan ve E-Model, R-Model, A-Model şeklinde adlandırılan derin öğrenme modellerinin farklı veri kümeleri üzerinde performansları karşılaştırılmıştır. CIFAR-10 veri kümesi için derin öğrenme modelleri sadece MİB (Merkezi İşlem Birimi) içeren bir makinede ve MİB ile GİB (Grafik İşlem Birimi) içeren bir makinede ayrı ayrı çalıştırılmıştır. Sadece MİB içeren makinede R-Model, A-Model ve E-Model için sırasıyla yaklaşık 415 saatlik, 129 saatlik ve 3.5 saatlik eğitim aşamaları sonucunda doğrulama veri seti üzerinde sırasıyla %82.76, %87.64 ve %83.47 doğruluk oranları elde edilmiştir. MİB ve GİB içeren makinede ise R-Model, A-Model ve E-Model için sırasıyla yaklaşık 4.45 saatlik, 2.20 saatlik ve 1.82 saatlik eğitim aşamaları sonucunda doğrulama veri seti üzerinde sırasıyla %82.61, %87.95 ve %82.43 doğruluk oranları elde edilmiştir. Diğer veri kümeleri için ise modeller MİB ve GİB içeren makinede çalıştırılarak deneysel sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Oluşturulan derin öğrenme modellerinin yapıları, eğitim için kullanılan parametre değerleri, doğrulama verileri için elde edilen karmaşıklık matrisleri, doğruluk ve kayıp grafikleri ayrıntılı olarak verilmiştir.

Comparison of Deep Learning Models in Image Classification

In this study, various experiments have been performed via deep learning models based on CNN (Convolutional Neural Networks), ResNet (Residential Energy Services Network) and NIN (Network In Network) approaches and their performances on various datasets have been investigated. The deep learning models were named as E-Model, R-Model and A-Model, respectively. The deep learning models were trained with CIFAR-10 dataset on a machine having only CPU (Central Processing Unit) and a machine having both CPU and GPU (Graphical Processing Unit). On the machine having only CPU, the traning time of the R-Model, A-Model and E-Model were approximately 415 hours, 129 hours and 3.5 hours, respectively. The percentage correct values on the validation data set were %82.76, %87.64 ve %83.47, respectively. On the machine having both CPU and GPU, the traning time of the R-Model, A-Model and the E-Model were approximately 4.45 hours, 2.20 hours and 1.82 hours, respectively. The percentage correct values on the validation data set were %82.61, %87.95 ve %82.43, respectively. The experimental results for the other data sets were obtained by training the models on the machine having both CPU and GPU. The structures of the constructed deep learning models, the parameters used for the training, the obtained confusion matrices for the validation data, the accuracy and loss graphics are given in detail.

___

  • Chu, X., Zhang, B., & Li, X., 2020, Noisy differentiable architecture search, arXiv:2005.03566.
  • Chu, X., Zhang, B., & Li, X., 2020, Noisy differentiable architecture search, arXiv:2005.03566.
  • Ciregan, D., Meier, U., & Schmidhuber, J., 2012, Multi-column Deep Neural Networks for Image Classification, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Providence, RI, USA, 2012, pp. 3642-3649.
  • Ciregan, D., Meier, U., & Schmidhuber, J., 2012, Multi-column Deep Neural Networks for Image Classification, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Providence, RI, USA, 2012, pp. 3642-3649.
  • Dabhi, R., 2020, (2020, 03.06.2021). Casting product image data for quality inspection. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/ravirajsinh45/real-life-industrial-dataset-of-casting-product.
  • Dabhi, R., 2020, (2020, 03.06.2021). Casting product image data for quality inspection. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/ravirajsinh45/real-life-industrial-dataset-of-casting-product.
  • Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L., 2009, Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database, in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009, CVPR 2009, IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2009, pp. 248–255.
  • Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L., 2009, Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database, in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009, CVPR 2009, IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2009, pp. 248–255.
  • Ganin, Y., Kononenko, D., Sungatullina, D., & Lempitsky V., 2016, Deepwarp: Photorealistic image resynthesis for gaze manipulation, European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Cham, pp. 311-326.
  • Ganin, Y., Kononenko, D., Sungatullina, D., & Lempitsky V., 2016, Deepwarp: Photorealistic image resynthesis for gaze manipulation, European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Cham, pp. 311-326.
  • Goodfellow, I., Warde-Farley, D., Mirza, M., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y., 2013, Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 28(3):1319-1327.
  • Goodfellow, I., Warde-Farley, D., Mirza, M., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y., 2013, Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 28(3):1319-1327.
  • Graham, B., 2014, Spatially-sparse convolutional neural networks, arXiv:1409.6070.
  • Graham, B., 2014, Spatially-sparse convolutional neural networks, arXiv:1409.6070.
  • He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & and Sun, J., 2016, Deep residual learning for image recognition, in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 770–778.
  • He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & and Sun, J., 2016, Deep residual learning for image recognition, in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 770–778.
  • Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L. & Weinberger, K. Q., 2017, Densely Connected Convolutional Networks, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA, pp. 2261-2269.
  • Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L. & Weinberger, K. Q., 2017, Densely Connected Convolutional Networks, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA, pp. 2261-2269.
  • İnik, Ö. & Ülker, E., 2017, Derin Öğrenme ve Görüntü Analizinde Kullanılan Derin Öğrenme Modelleri, Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi, 6(3): 85-104.
  • İnik, Ö. & Ülker, E., 2017, Derin Öğrenme ve Görüntü Analizinde Kullanılan Derin Öğrenme Modelleri, Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi, 6(3): 85-104.
  • Kabir, H.M.D.; Abdar, M.; Jalali, S.M.J.; Khosravi, A.; Atiya, A.F.; Nahavandi, S.; Srinivasan, D., 2020, SpinalNet: Deep neural net workwith gradual input, arXiv:2007.03347.
  • Kabir, H.M.D.; Abdar, M.; Jalali, S.M.J.; Khosravi, A.; Atiya, A.F.; Nahavandi, S.; Srinivasan, D., 2020, SpinalNet: Deep neural net workwith gradual input, arXiv:2007.03347.
  • Kızrak, M.A., Bolat, B., 2018, Derin Öğrenme ile Kalabalık Analizi Üzerine Detaylı Bir Araştırma, Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, (11) 3: 263-286.
  • Kızrak, M.A., Bolat, B., 2018, Derin Öğrenme ile Kalabalık Analizi Üzerine Detaylı Bir Araştırma, Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, (11) 3: 263-286.
  • Koryakin, P., 2019, (2019, 03.06.2021). Fingers. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/koryakinp/fingers.
  • Koryakin, P., 2019, (2019, 03.06.2021). Fingers. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/koryakinp/fingers.
  • Krizhevsky, A., 2009, Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images, Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto.
  • Krizhevsky, A., 2009, Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images, Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto.
  • Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E., 2012, ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, NIPS'12: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe Nevada, USA, 2012, pp. 1097-1115.
  • Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E., 2012, ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, NIPS'12: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe Nevada, USA, 2012, pp. 1097-1115.
  • Lin, M., Chen, Q., & Yan, S., 2013, Network in network, arXiv:1312.4400.
  • Lin, M., Chen, Q., & Yan, S., 2013, Network in network, arXiv:1312.4400.
  • Liu, Q & Mukhopadhyay, S., 2018, Unsupervised Learning using Pretrained CNN and Associative Memory Bank, International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN 2018), 8-13 Jul 2018, Rio, Brazil, pp. 1-8.
  • Liu, Q & Mukhopadhyay, S., 2018, Unsupervised Learning using Pretrained CNN and Associative Memory Bank, International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN 2018), 8-13 Jul 2018, Rio, Brazil, pp. 1-8.
  • Liu, Q., Zhang, N., Yang, W., Wang, S., Cui, Z., Chen, X., & Chen, L., 2017, A Review of Image Recognition with Deep Convolutional Neural Network, In: Huang DS., Bevilacqua V., Premaratne P., Gupta P. (eds) Intelligent Computing Theories and Application. ICIC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 10361. Springer, Cham.
  • Liu, Q., Zhang, N., Yang, W., Wang, S., Cui, Z., Chen, X., & Chen, L., 2017, A Review of Image Recognition with Deep Convolutional Neural Network, In: Huang DS., Bevilacqua V., Premaratne P., Gupta P. (eds) Intelligent Computing Theories and Application. ICIC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 10361. Springer, Cham.
  • Lu, Z., Sreekumar, G., Goodman, E., Banzhaf, W., Deb, K. & Boddeti, V. N., 2021, Neural Architecture Transfer, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, (43): 2971-2989.
  • Lu, Z., Sreekumar, G., Goodman, E., Banzhaf, W., Deb, K. & Boddeti, V. N., 2021, Neural Architecture Transfer, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, (43): 2971-2989.
  • Mc Culloch, W.S. & Pitts, W., 1943, A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity, The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5(4): 115–133.
  • Mc Culloch, W.S. & Pitts, W., 1943, A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity, The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5(4): 115–133.
  • Netzer, Y., Wang, T., Coates, A., Bissacco, A., Wu, Bo. & Ng, A.Y., 2011, Reading Digits in Natural Images with Unsupervised Feature Learning, NIPS Workshop on Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning.
  • Netzer, Y., Wang, T., Coates, A., Bissacco, A., Wu, Bo. & Ng, A.Y., 2011, Reading Digits in Natural Images with Unsupervised Feature Learning, NIPS Workshop on Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning.
  • Nilsback, M. & Zisserman, A., 2006, A Visual Vocabulary for Flower Classification, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, pp.1447-1454.
  • Nilsback, M. & Zisserman, A., 2006, A Visual Vocabulary for Flower Classification, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, pp.1447-1454.
  • Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L. & Group T.P.R., 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L. & Group T.P.R., 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • Springenberg, J.T., Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T. & Riedmiller, M., 2015, Striving for simplicity: The All Convolutional Net, arXiv:1412.6806.
  • Springenberg, J.T., Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T. & Riedmiller, M., 2015, Striving for simplicity: The All Convolutional Net, arXiv:1412.6806.
  • Ulucan, O., Karakaya, D. & Turkan, M., 2020, A Large-Scale Dataset for Fish Segmentation and Classification, 2020 Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications Conference (ASYU), Istanbul, Turkey, 2020, pp. 1-5.
  • Ulucan, O., Karakaya, D. & Turkan, M., 2020, A Large-Scale Dataset for Fish Segmentation and Classification, 2020 Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications Conference (ASYU), Istanbul, Turkey, 2020, pp. 1-5.
  • Wang, G., Wang, K., & Lin, L., 2019, Adaptively Connected Neural Networks, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019, pp. 1781-1790.
  • Wang, G., Wang, K., & Lin, L., 2019, Adaptively Connected Neural Networks, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019, pp. 1781-1790.
Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences-Cover
  • Yayıncı: Konya Teknik Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Zaman Gecikmesi Uygulanarak Su Seviyesi Kontrolü İçin PID Kontrolör ve Bulanık Mantık Kontrolörünün Performans Karşılaştırması

Fuad ALHAJ OMAR

Bazı Ticari Soğuk Pres Yağların Kimyasal Özelliklerinin ve Oksidatif Kararlılığının İncelenmesi

H. Filiz AYYILDIZ, Mustafa TOPKAFA, Syed Tufail Hussain SHERAZI, Sarfaraz Ahmed MAHESAR, Hüseyin KARA

BALIKESİR İLİ ERDEK İLÇESİ İÇİN BAĞIMSIZ HİBRİT ENERJİ SİSTEMİNİN FİZİBİLİTE ÇALIŞMASI VE EKONOMİK ANALİZİ

Aykut Fatih GÜVEN, Mertcan METE

Polietilenimin ile Modifiye Edilmiş Silika Kserojellerin Kullanımı ile CO2 Tutumu

Gülcihan GÜZEL KAYA, Hüseyin DEVECİ

ATMOSFERİK BRÜLÖRDE ENJEKTÖR ÇAPI, ENJEKSİYON HIZI VE HAVA GİRİŞ DELİKLERİ SAYISININ HAVA-YAKIT KARIŞMASINA ETKİSİNİN NÜMERİK İNCELENMESİ

Seyda ÖZBEKTAŞ, Bilal SUNGUR, Bahattin TOPALOĞLU

Siber Fiziksel Sistemlerde İç-Mekân Akıllı Lojistik için Adaptif İşletim Modeli

Emrah DÖNMEZ, Fatih OKUMUŞ, Fatih KOCAMAZ

EEG SİNYALLERİNİ KULLANARAK 2B VE 3B HİBRİT BİR VİDEONUN AYRINTILI KANAL/LOB ANALİZİ

Negin MANSHOURI, Mesut MELEK, Temel KAYIKÇIOĞLU

GÖRÜNTÜ SINIFLANDIRMADA DERİN ÖĞRENME YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

İlker DAĞLI, Ali ÖZTÜRK

PVA/ AMBERLİT IRA 743 HİBRİT MEMBRAN İLE ENDÜSTRİYEL ATIK SUDAN BOR GİDERİMİ

Mehtap ÖZEKMEKCİ, Derya ÜNLÜ, Mehmet ÇOPUR

KOCAELİ-GEBZE TAVŞANLI BÖLGESİ KİREÇTAŞLARININ BETON AGREGASI OLARAK KULLANILABİLİRLİĞİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI

Hüseyin AKYILDIRIM, Ahmet KARAKAŞ