ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: The aim was to determine the effectiveness of the posterior pericardial window (PW) technique in preventing the development of pericardial effusion (PE) following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG). METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary surgery were randomly divided into a control or a PW group. We divided 220 patients randomly into 2 groups, the posterior pericardial window group (n=110) and the control group (n=110). Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinical data were collected retrospectively, including incidence of pericardial tamponade, drainage volume, ventilation time and moderate to large pericardial effusion. Evaluations were completed preoperatively, before discharge, and on postoperative 7 and 30 days including electrocardiography, chest radiography, echocardiography. Postoperative causes of morbidity, the duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographic data between two groups (P>.05). Echocardiography evaluations revealed no significant difference between groups preoperatively; however, before discharge the control group had a significantly higher number of patients with early and late cardiac tamponade compared with the PW group (P
ÖZ GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Posterior perikardiyal pencere tekniğinin, koroner arter bypass greftleme (CABG) ameliyatı sonrası perikardiyal efüzyon gelişimini önlemedeki etkinliğini belirlemekti. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Koroner cerrahi geçirecek hastalar rastgele bir kontrole veya perikardiyal pencere tekniği grubuna ayrıldı. Toplamda 210 hastayı 2 gruba ayırdık, posterior perikardiyal pencere grubu (n = 110) ve kontrol grubu (n = 110). Preoperatif, intraoperatif ve postoperatif klinik veriler retrospektif olarak toplandı. Preoperatif, taburcu olmadan önce ve postoperatif 7. ve 30. günlerde yapılan değerlendirmelere elektrokardiyografi, göğüs radyografisi, ekokardiyografik incelemeler yapıldı. Postoperatif morbidite nedenleri ve yoğun bakım ünitesinde ve hastanede kalış süreleri kaydedildi. BULGULAR: İki grup arasında demografik veriler açısından anlamlı fark yoktu (P >.05). Ekokardiyografi incelemeleri ameliyat öncesi gruplar arasında anlamlı bir farklılık yoktu; bununla birlikte, taburcu edilmeden önce, kontrol grubunda, perikardiyal pencere grubuna kıyasla, erken ve geç kardiyak tamponad anlamlı olarak yüksek bulundu (P
___
1. Weitzman LB, Tinker WP, Kronzon I, Cohen ML, Glassman E, Spencer FC. The incidence and natural history of pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery an echocardiographic study. Circulation 1984; 69: 506-511.
2. Pepi M, Muratori M, Barbier P, Doria E, Arena V, Berti M, et al. Pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery: incidence, site, size, and haemodynamic consequences. Br Heart J 1994; 72: 327-331.
3. Kaleda VI, McCormack DJ, Shipolini AR. Does posterior pericardiotomy reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2012; 14:384–9.
4. Bakhshandeh AR, Salehi M, Radmehr H, Sattarzadeh R, Nasr AR, Sadeghpour AH. Postoperative pericardial effusion and posterior pericardiotomy related. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2009; 17:477-9.
5. Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Doty DB.. Postoperative care. In: Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Doty DB, Hanley FL, Karp RB. Kirklin/BarrattBoyes cardiac surgery 2003 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier. p 230-42.
6. Finkelstein Y, Shemesh J, Mahlab K, Abramov D, Barel Y, Sagie A, et al. Colchicine for the prevention of postpericardiotomy syndrome. Herz 2002; 27: 791-794.
7. Prince SE, Cunha BA. Postpericardiotomy syndrome. Heart Lung 1997; 26: 165-168. 8. Kuvin JT, Harati NA, Pandian NG, Bojar RM, Khabbaz KR. Postoperative cardiac tamponade in the modern surgical era. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 1148-1153
9. Sadeghpour B, Baharestani G, Ghasemzade R, Baghaei N. Influences of posterior pericardiotomy in early and late postoperative effusion of pericardium. Iranian J Cardiac Surg. 2011; 3 : 42-43 10. Pavlenko MV. Postpericardiotomy syndrome after surgery of the heart. Ter Arkh. 1990;62(4):66- 9.
11. Eerlich JF, Paz Z. Postpericardial injury syndrome: An autoimmune phenomenon. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2010;38:156-158.
12. Mason TG, Neal WA, Dibartolomeo AG. Elevated antinuclear antibody titers and the postpericardiotomy syndrome. J Pediatr 1990; 116: 403-404.
13. Kaya M, Iyigun T, Yazici P, Melek Y, Gode S, Guler S. The effects of posterior pericardiotomy on pericardial effusion, tamponade, and atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. KardiochirTorakochirurgia Pol. 2014;11 : 113-118
14. Kaygin MA, Dag O, Gunes M, Senocak M, Limandal HK, Aslan U. Posterior pericardiotomy reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation, pericardial effusion, and length of stay in hospital after coronary artery bypasses surgery. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2011; 225:103-108.
15. Zhao Z, Cheng X, Quan Z. Zhao. Does posterior pericardial window technique prevent pericardial tamponade after cardiac surgery? J Int Med Res. 2014;42 : 416-426