Üstbilişsel perspektiften depresyon ve tedavisi üzerine bir derleme

Günümüzde depresyon önemli ve yaygın bir ruh sağlığı problemi olmaya devam etmektedir. Depresyon için standart müdahale farmakoterapi ve psikoterapi olsa da tekrar (nüks) eden depresyonlar önemli bir sorun teşkil etmektedir. Klinik psikolojide de yaygınlaşmaya başlayan üstbiliş çalışmaları, tekrar eden depresyonlar ile depresif ruminasyona odaklanmaktadır. Kırk yıl kadar önce ilk kez ortaya konan üstbiliş kavramı ve sonrasında bu konuda yapılan çalışmalar birçok alanda yeni bakış açıları kazandırmıştır. Bireyin kendi bilişine ilişkin bilgisi olarak tanımlanan üstbiliş, depresyonun açıklanmasında da yeni fikirler vermektedir. Özellikle bilişsel içeriğin dışında, bireyin bilişsel süreçlerine vurgu yapılmaktadır. Bu derlemede, klinik psikolojide depresyonun üstbilişsel açıdan nasıl ele alındığı ve tedavisine yönelik bu bilgilerin nasıl kullanıldığı aktarılmıştır. Ayrıca depresyona yönelik yeni müdahale arayışlarının devam ettiği bir dönemde, üstbiliş çalışmalarının psikoterapi ve psikopatolojiye yönelik umut veren yansımalarının neler olabileceği gözden geçirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda üstbilişsel yöntemlerin kendi başına terapötik bir müdahale olma potansiyeli taşıdığı gibi mevcut terapi modellerine destek olacağı olasılığının üzerinde durulmuştur.

A review of depression and its treatment from a metacognitive perspective

Depression has continued to be a major and prevalent mental health problem. Though standard interventions for depression are pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, recurring depression still constitutes a major problem. Metacognition studies that have become widespread in clinical psychology recently have focused on recurring depression and depressive rumination. The term “metacognition” that was firstly introduced approximately four decades ago, and related studies created new perspectives in various fields. Metacognition is defined as the awareness of the individual regarding her/his own cognition and provides insight in understanding depression. It emphasizes not only to cognitive content but also cognitive processes of the individual. In this review, how depression is approached in clinical psychology from a metacognitive perspective and how this information is used for treatment were indicated. Furthermore, in a period that new intervention methods for depression are sought, promising aspects of metacognition studies in regard to psychotherapy and psychopathology were also discussed. In this context, in addition to the possibility of metacognitive methods to be used to support the existing therapy models, its potential as a separate therapeutic intervention method was also discussed.

___

  • Allan, L. C. (2010). Rumination and reflection: An investigation of self-focus, metacognition, and coping styles in depression and anxiety. Unpublished Dissertation, Calgary University, Canada.
  • Antonuccio, D. O., Danton, W. G. ve DeNelsky, G.Y. (1995). Psychotherapy versus medication for depression: Challenging the conventional wisdom with data. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,26(6), 574-585.
  • Ashouri, A., Atef-Vahid, M. K., Gharaee, B. ve Rasoulian, M. (2013). Effectiveness of meta-cognitive and cognitive-behavioral therapy in patients with majör depressive disorder. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 24-34.
  • Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125- 143.
  • Barnhofer, T., Kuehn, E. M., Jong-Meyer, R. ve Williams, J. M. G. (2006). Beliefs about benefits of rumination in depressed men and women with and without a history of assault. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35(3), 317-324.
  • Beauregard, M. (2007). Mind does really matter: Evidence from neuroimaging studies of emotional selfregulation, psychotherapy, and placebo effect. Progress in Neurobiology, 81(4), 218-236.
  • Burcusa, S. L. ve Iacono, W. G. (2007). Risk for recurrence of depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(8), 959-985.
  • Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. R. Glasser (Ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum. Corcoran, K. M. ve Segal, Z. V. (2008). Metacognition in depressive and anxiety disorders: Current directions. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 1(1), 33-44.
  • David, D., Szentagotai, A., Lupu, V. ve Cosman, D. (2008). Rational emotive behavior therapy, cognitive therapy, and medication in the treatment of major depressive disorder: A randomized clinical trial posttreatment outcomes, and six-month follow-up. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 728-746.
  • Desoete, A. ve Özsoy, G. (2009). Introduction: Metacognition, more than the lognes monster? International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 1-6.
  • Driessen, E., Hollon, S. D., Bockting, C. L. H., Cuijpers, P., Turner, E. H. ve Lu, L. (2015). Does publication bias inflate the apparent efficacy of psychological treatment for major depressive disorder? A systematic review and meta-analysis of US National Institutes of health-funded trials. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 1-23.
  • Farb, N. A. S., Anderson, A. K., Mayberg, H., Bean, J., McKeon, D. ve Segal, Z. V. (2007). Attending to the present: Mindfulness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self-reference. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(4), 313-322.
  • Farb, N. A. S., Segal, Z. V., Mayberg, H., Bean, J., McKeon, D., Fatima, Z. ve Anderson, A. K. (2010). Minding one’s emotions: Mindfulness training alters the neural expression of sadness. Emotion,10(2), 25-33.
  • Fennell, M. J. V. (2004). Depression, low self-esteem and mindfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(9), 1053-1067.
  • Fernandez-Duque, D., Baird, J. A. ve Posner, M. I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 9(2), 288-307.