Ali TÜRKYILMAZ, Merve AYDOĞDU, Mehmet Zahit ADIŞEN, Ali ALTINDAĞ

ORTA ANADOLU TOPLUMUNDA ALT ÇENE KÜÇÜK AZI DİŞLERİNİN KÖK KANAL MORFOLOJİSİNİN VE KRON-KÖK ORANININ KONİK IŞINLI BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Amaç: Bu retrospektif çalışmanın amacı, alt çene küçük azı dişlerinin kök kanal anatomisinin yapısal konfigürasyonlarını ve kron-kök oranını cinsiyete, yaş aralıklarına ve bilateral uyum varlığına göre konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi kullanarak incelemektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Konik-ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi, Kron-kök oranı, kök kanal morfolojisi, Alt çene küçük azı dişleri

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Root Canal Morphology and Crown-to-Root Ratio of Mandibular Premolars in Middle Anatolian Population

Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate morphological configurations of root canal anatomy and crown-to-root ratio of mandibular premolar teeth by gender, age intervals and occurrence of bilateral harmony using cone beam computed tomography scanning.

Keywords:

Cone-beam computed tomography, crown-to-root ratio, root canal morphology, Mandibular premolar teeth,

PDF

___

1. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):3-29.
2. Hess W, Zürcher E. The Anatomy of Root Canals of the Teeth of the Permanent and Deciduous Dentitions. NewYork. William Wood & Co, 1925.
3. Siqueira JF Jr. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J. 2001;34(1):1-10.
4. Liu N, Li X, Liu N, Ye L, An J, Nie X et al. A micro-computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of the mandibular first premolar in a population from southwestern China. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(3):999-1007.
5. Brescia NJ. Applied Dental Anatomy. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co. 1961:46-8.
6. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular second premolar: a literature review. J Endod. 2007;33(9):1031-7.
7. Macri E, Zmener O. Five canals in a mandibular second premolar. J Endod. 2000;26(5):304-5.
8. Holtta P, Nyström M, Evalahti M, Alaluusua S. Root-crown ratios of permanent teeth in a healthy Finnish population assessed from panoramic radiographs. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(5):491-7. 9. Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004;30(6):391-8.
10. Barbizam JV, Ribeiro RG, Tanomaru Filho M. Unusual anatomy of permanent maxillary molars. J Endod. 2004;30(9):668-71.
11. Slowey RR. Root canal anatomy. Road map to successful endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1979;23(4):555-73.
12. Awawdeh LA, Al-Qudah AA. Root form and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J. 2008;41(3):240-8.
13. Walker RT. Root canal anatomy of mandibular first premolars in a southern Chinese population. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1988;4(5):226-8.
14. Zillich R, Dowson J. Root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973;36(5):738-44.
15. Holtzman L. Root canal treatment of mandibular second premolar with four root canals: a case report. Int Endod J. 1998;31(5):364-6.
16. Al-Abdulwahhab B, Al-Nazhan S. Root canal treatment of mandibular second premolar with four root canals. Saudi Endod J. 2015;5(3):196.
17. Rödig T, Hülsmann M. Diagnosis and root canal treatment of a mandibular second premolar with three root canals. Int Endod J. 2003;36(12):912-9.
18. Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L. Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod. 1986;12(8):343-5.
19. Velmurugan N, Sandhya R. Root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in an Indian population: a laboratory study. Int Endod J. 2009;42(1):54-8.
20. Zhang D, Chen J, Lan G, Li M, An J, Wen X et al. The root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars: a comparative evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21(4):1007-12.
21. Fernandes LM, Rice D, Ordinola-Zapata R, Capelozza AL, Bramante CM, Jaramillo D et al. Detection of various anatomic patterns of root canals in mandibular incisors using digital periapical radiography, 3 cone-beam computed tomographic scanners, and micro-computed tomographic imaging. J Endod. 2014;40(1):42-5.
22. Kottoor J, Velmurugan N, Surendran S. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with eight root canal systems evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a case report. J Endod. 2011;37(5):715-9.
23. Marca C, Dummer PM, Bryant S, Vier-Pelisser FV, Só MV, Fontanella V et al. Three-rooted premolar analyzed by high-resolution and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(6):1535-40.
24. Akay G, Atak N, Güngör K. Adli diş hekimliğinde dişler kullanılarak yapılan yaş tayini yöntemleri. EÜ Dişhekimliği Fak Derg. 2018;39(2):73-82.
25. Bozdemir E, Amasya H. Yaşlanmayla birlikte ağız ve çevresindeki dokularda gözlenen yapısal ve fonksiyonel değişiklikler. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2019;6(2):239-46.
26. Volumen SY, de Dientes Premolares, UEP. Crown-to-root ratios in terms of length, surface area and volume: A pilot study of premolars. Int J Morphol. 2016;34(2):465-70.
27. Greenstein G, Cavallaro JS. Importance of crown to root and crown to implant ratios. Dent Today. 2011;30(3):61-2.
28. Dykema RW. Fixed partial prosthodontics. J Tenn Dent Assoc. 1968;43:309-21.
29. Treatment planning for the replacement of missing teeth. In: Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of Fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence Publishing Company. 1997:85-103.