Liberal Çokkültürcülük: (Çok)Ulusalcı Liberalizm ve Azınlık-içindeki-Azınlıklar Sorunsalı
20. yüzyılın son çeyreğinde, çıkış noktasını mensubu olduğu kültüre, ulusa
veya devlete karşı korunması için bireysel haklarla donatılmış ve içerisinde
yetiştiği kültürü rasyonel yetileri ile değerlendirip terk edebilme gücüne sahip
“birey” anlayışında bulan “bireyci” liberalizmin içerisinden, bireylerin “kültürel”
varlıklar olduklarını, bireysel özgürlüğün “kültürlerin korunması” olmaksızın icra
edilemeyeceğini, bunun için de “kültürel azınlık hakları”nın liberalizmin olmazsa
olmazı olduğunu savunan “liberal çokkültürcülük” doğmuştur. Bu yazıda, liberal
çokkültürcülüğün en önemli versiyonlarından biri olan “(çok)ulusalcı liberalizm”
incelenecek ve onun kadınlardan, LGBTİ bireylerinden ve dini veya mezhepsel
muhaliflerden oluşan “azınlık-içindeki-azınlık” gruplarının ortaya çıkardığı
çoğulculuğu kapsayacak teorik araçlar geliştiremediği; bu yüzden de yeterince
çoğulcu olmadığı iddia edilecektir.
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Liberalizm, çokkültürcülük, ulusalcılık, azınlık hakları, azınlık-içindeki-azınlıklar
Liberal Multiculturalism: (Multi)Nationalism and the Problem of Minorities- within-Minorities
In the last quarter of the 20th century, liberal multiculturalism was
born out of individualistic liberalism. Whereas the latter takes as its starting point
the individual, who is supposed to be protected against the intrusions of his/her
culture, nation, or state via individual rights, and who is capable of leaving the
cultural heritage s/he was raised into; the former takes human beings as cultural
entities, and defends that individual freedom cannot be performed without the
protection of culture and that cultural minority rights are the sine qua non for
liberalism. In this essay, I will examine one of the most important versions of
liberal multiculturalism, namely (multi)national liberalism, and argue that it is
not pluralistic enough due to the fact that it has not created the necessary tools
to accommodate the sort of pluralism that is formed out of minorities-withinminorities.
___
- Benhabib, S. (2002). The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Carens, J. (2010). Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Gurr, T. (2000). Peoples versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century. Washington: United States Institute of Peace.
- Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kymlicka, W. (2007). Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Levy, J. (2000). The Multiculturalism of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Levy, J. (2003). Indigenous Self-Government. Secession and Self-Determination içinde. Der. S. Macedo & A. Buchanan. New York: New York University Press.
- Margalit, A. & Halbertal, M. (2004). Liberalism and the Right to Culture. Social Research: An International Quarterly 71, ss. 529-548.
- Margalit, A. & Raz, J. (1990). National Self-Determination. The Journal of Philosophy 87, ss. 439-461.
- McGarry, J. (1998). Demographic Engineering: The State-Directed Movements of Ethnic Groups as a Technique of Conflict Resolution. Ethnic and Racial Studies 21, ss. 613-638.
- Mill, J. S. (1972). Considerations on Representative Government. Utilitarianism, Liberty, Representative Government içinde. Der. H. Acton. London: J. M. Dent.
- Miller, D. (1995). On Nationality. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Miller, D. (1999). Group Identities, National Identities and Democratic Politics. Toleration, Identity and Difference içinde. Der. J. Horton & S. Mendus. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Miller, D. (2013). Justice for Earthlings: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Modood, T. (2013). Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Okin, S. M. (1998). Feminism and Multiculturalism: Some Tensions. Ethics 108, ss. 661-684.
- Okin, S. M. (2002). ‘Mistresses of Their Own Destiny’: Group Rights, Gender, and Realistic Rights of Exit. Ethics 112, ss. 205-230.
- Penz, P. (1992). Development Refugees and Distributive Justice: Indigenous Peoples, Land and the Developmentalist State. Public Affairs Quarterly 6, ss. 105-131.
- Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (revised edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism (expanded edition). New York: Columbia Press.
- Raz, J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Raz, J. (1995). Multiculturalism: A Liberal Perspective. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (revised edition) içinde. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Reitman, O. (2005). On Exit. Minorities-within-Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity içinde. Der. A. Eisenberg & J. Spinner-Halev. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Shachar, A. (1998). Group Identity and Women’s Rights in Family Law: The Perils of Multicultural Accommodation. The Journal of Political Philosophy 6, ss. 285-305.
- Shachar, A. (2000). On Citizenship and Multicultural Vulnerability. Political Theory 28, ss. 64-89.
- Tamir, Y. (1991). The Right to National Self-Determination. Social Research 58, ss. 565-590.
- Tamir, Y. (1993). Liberal Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Tamir, Y. (1995). The Enigma of Nationalism. World Politics 47, ss. 418-440.
- Tamir, Y. (1999). Against Collective Rights. Multicultural Questions içinde. Der. C. Joppke & S. Lukes. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Weinstock, D. (2002). Citizenship and Pluralism. The Blackwell Guide to Social and Political Philosophy içinde. Der. R. Simod. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
- Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
- Başlangıç: 2014
- Yayıncı: Eray Yağanak
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
Ölüm Kavramının Heidegger ve Sartre Felsefesindeki Yeri
Liberal Çokkültürcülük: (Çok)Ulusalcı Liberalizm ve Azınlık-içindeki-Azınlıklar Sorunsalı
Epistemik Gerekçelendirmenin Doğası Üzerine
An Analysis on McGinn’s Mysterianism: Reply to Erhan Demircioglu