HASTALARA DAĞITILAN BROŞÜRLERİN ÖĞRETİMSEL MESAJ TASARIMI İLKELERİNE GÖRE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Bu çalışmanın ilk amacı fizik tedavi hastalarına dağıtılan broşürlerin öğretimsel mesaj tasarımı ilkelerine uyumunu incelemektir. Bu çalışmanın ikinci amacı broşürlerin öğretimsel mesaj tasarımına uyumunun hastaların başarı düzeylerine ve davranış örüntülerine etkisini araştırmaktır. Araştırmada deneysel olmayan karşılaştırma deseni kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini 6 broşür ve 36 hasta oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veriler gözlem formları ile toplanıp nicel betimsel tablolar ve nitel içerik analizi yöntemler kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Hastalara dağıtılan broşürlerin bir kısmının öğretimsel mesaj tasarımı ilkelerine uyduğu, bir kısmının ise uymadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre broşürlerin hazırlanması sırasında öğretimsel mesaj tasarımı ilkelerine uyulmalıdır. Hastaların başarı düzeyleri incelendiğinde ilkelere uyan broşürlerin daha başarılı olduğu görülmektedir.

DO INSTRUCTIONAL MESSAGE DESIGN PRINCIPLES WORK FOR PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION PATIENT LEAFLETS?

This research investigates the patient leaflets used in terms of instructional message design principles. Non-experimental comparative design has been used in this study. The study sample consists of 6 different types of patient leaflets that are distributed in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department of Erzurum Atatürk University Research Hospital for the first research question, and 36 patients for the second research question. Patients have successfully applied the exercises in printed materials appropriate to these principles. According to the results obtained, these principles must be followed during the preparation of these leaflets. The success level of leaflets to educate Physiotherapy and rehabilitation patients is increasing when the message design principles are taken care of. The leaflets that comply with instructional message design principles have serious implications for patients’ success level for exercises.

___

  • Cardinal, B. J., & Sachs, M. L. (1992). An analysis of the readability of exercise promoting litera- ture with implications and suggestions for practice. Research Quarterly For Exercise and Sport, 63(2), 186-190.
  • Cardinal, B. J., & Seidler, T. L. (1995). Readability and comprehensibility of the “Exercise Lite” brochure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80(2), 399-402.
  • Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational psychology review, 14(1), 5-26.
  • Clerehan, R., & Buchbinder, R. (2006). Toward a more valid account of functional text quality: The case of the patient information leaflet. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 26(1), 39-68.
  • Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., Turner, L. A., & Christensen, L. B. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis.
  • Davis, T. C., Fredrickson, D. D., Arnold, C., Murphy, P. W., Herbst, M., & Bocchini, J. A. (1998). A polio immunization pamphlet with increased appeal and simplified language does not improve comprehension to an acceptable level. Patient Education and Counse- ling, 33(1), 25-37.
  • Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., & Root, J. H. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. 1996. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippencott Co Google Scholar.
  • Dowse, R., & Ehlers, M. S. (2001). The evaluation of pharmaceutical pictograms in a low-literate South African population. Patient education and counseling, 45(2), 87-99.
  • Dowse, R., Ramela, T., & Browne, S. H. (2011). An illustrated leaflet containing antiretroviral information targeted for low-literate readers: development and evaluation. Patient edu- cation and counseling, 85(3), 508-515.
  • Eames, S., McKenna, K., Worrall, L., & Read, S. (2003). The suitability of written education ma- terials for stroke survivors and their carers. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 10(3), 70-83.
  • Eker, L., Tüzün, E. H., Aytar, A., & Daşkapan, A. (2013). Fizik tedavi ve rehabilitasyon klinikle- rinde kullanılan sağlık eğitim materyallerinin okunabilirlik düzeyi. Fizyoterapi Rehabi- litasyon, 24(1), 93-98.
  • Fleming, M. L. (1993). Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral and cogniti- ve sciences. Educational Technology.
  • Filippatou, D., & Pumfrey, P. D. (1996). Pictures, titles, reading accuracy and reading compre- hension: a research review (1973-95). Educational Research, 38(3), 259-291.
  • Graafland, M., Schraagen, J. M., & Schijven, M. P. (2012). Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. British journal of surgery, 99(10), 1322- 1330.
  • Hoffmann, T., & McKenna, K. (2006). Analysis of stroke patients’ and carers’ reading ability and the content and design of written materials: recommendations for improving written stroke information. Patient education and counseling, 60(3), 286-293.
  • Hosey, G. M., Freeman, W. L., Stracqualursi, F., & Gohdes, D. (1990). Designing and evaluating diabetes education material for American Indians. The Diabetes Educator, 16(5), 407- 414.
  • Houts, P. S., Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., & Loscalzo, M. J. (2006). The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient education and counseling, 61(2), 173-190.
  • Kovacs, G. (1997). Procedural skills in medicine: linking theory to practice. Journal of Emer- gency Medicine, 15(3), 387-391.
  • Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. ECTJ, 30(4), 195-232.
  • Moll, J. M. (1986). Doctor-patient communication in rheumatology: studies of visual and verbal perception using educational booklets and other graphic material. Annals of the rheu- matic diseases, 45(3), 198.
  • Morrow, D. G., Hier, C. M., Menard, W. E., & Leirer, V. O. (1998). Icons improve older and yo- unger adults' comprehension of medication information. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53(4), P240-P254.
  • Närhi, U. (2007). Sources of medicine information and their reliability evaluated by medicine users. Pharmacy World & Science, 29(6), 688-694.
  • Readence, J. E., & Moore, D. W. (1981). A meta-analytic review of the effect of adjunct pictures on reading comprehension. Psychology in the Schools, 18(2), 218-224.
  • Rees, C. E., Ford, J. E., & Sheard, C. E. (2003). Patient information leaflets for prostate cancer: which leaflets should healthcare professionals recommend?. Patient education and co- unseling, 49(3), 263-272.
  • Seels, B. (1996). A Conceptual Framework and Procedure for Message Design.
  • Stapleton, H., Kirkham, M., & Thomas, G. (2002). Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. Bmj, 324(7338), 639.
  • Twomey, C. (2009). An analysis of patient information leaflets supplied with medicines sold by pharmacists in the United Kingdom. Library and Information Research, 25(80), 3-12.
  • Whatley, S., Mamdani, M., & Upshur, R. E. (2002). A randomised comparison of the effect of three patient information leaflet models on older patients' treatment intentions. Br J Gen Pract, 52(479), 483-484.
  • Vallance, J. K., Taylor, L. M., & Lavallee, C. (2008). Suitability and readability assessment of educational print resources related to physical activity: implications and recommenda- tions for practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 72(2), 342-349.